Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian Alert -- May 12, 2004 [EST]-- IRAN LIVE THREAD -- "Americans for Regime Change in Iran"
The Iranian Student Movement Up To The Minute Reports ^ | 5.12.2004 | DoctorZin

Posted on 05/11/2004 9:00:39 PM PDT by DoctorZIn

The US media almost entirely ignores news regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran. As Tony Snow of the Fox News Network has put it, “this is probably the most under-reported news story of the year.” Most American’s are unaware that the Islamic Republic of Iran is NOT supported by the masses of Iranians today. Modern Iranians are among the most pro-American in the Middle East.

There is a popular revolt against the Iranian regime brewing in Iran today. I began these daily threads June 10th 2003. On that date Iranians once again began taking to the streets to express their desire for a regime change. Today in Iran, most want to replace the regime with a secular democracy.

The regime is working hard to keep the news about the protest movement in Iran from being reported. Unfortunately, the regime has successfully prohibited western news reporters from covering the demonstrations. The voices of discontent within Iran are sometime murdered, more often imprisoned. Still the people continue to take to the streets to demonstrate against the regime.

In support of this revolt, Iranians in America have been broadcasting news stories by satellite into Iran. This 21st century news link has greatly encouraged these protests. The regime has been attempting to jam the signals, and locate the satellite dishes. Still the people violate the law and listen to these broadcasts. Iranians also use the Internet and the regime attempts to block their access to news against the regime. In spite of this, many Iranians inside of Iran read these posts daily to keep informed of the events in their own country.

This daily thread contains nearly all of the English news reports on Iran. It is thorough. If you follow this thread you will witness, I believe, the transformation of a nation. This daily thread provides a central place where those interested in the events in Iran can find the best news and commentary. The news stories and commentary will from time to time include material from the regime itself. But if you read the post you will discover for yourself, the real story of what is occurring in Iran and its effects on the war on terror.

I am not of Iranian heritage. I am an American committed to supporting the efforts of those in Iran seeking to replace their government with a secular democracy. I am in contact with leaders of the Iranian community here in the United States and in Iran itself.

If you read the daily posts you will gain a better understanding of the US war on terrorism, the Middle East and why we need to support a change of regime in Iran. Feel free to ask your questions and post news stories you discover in the weeks to come.

If all goes well Iran will be free soon and I am convinced become a major ally in the war on terrorism. The regime will fall. Iran will be free. It is just a matter of time.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alsadr; armyofmahdi; ayatollah; cleric; humanrights; iaea; insurgency; iran; iranianalert; iranquake; iraq; jayshalmahdi; journalist; kazemi; khamenei; khatami; khatemi; moqtadaalsadr; persecution; politicalprisoners; protests; rafsanjani; revolutionaryguard; rumsfeld; satellitetelephones; shiite; southasia; southwestasia; studentmovement; studentprotest; terrorism; terrorists; wot
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”

1 posted on 05/11/2004 9:00:41 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife; fat city; freedom44; Tamsey; Grampa Dave; PhiKapMom; McGavin999; Hinoki Cypress; ...
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”

2 posted on 05/11/2004 9:02:58 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Iranian Students Vow To Fight Professor's Death Sentence

May 11, 2004
The Associated Press

Iranian students protested Tuesday the "medieval and disgusting" death sentence against a history professor who spoke out against the country's hard-line clerics, a case that led to a wave of clashes in 2002.

Under tight security, more than 600 students gathered on Tehran University's campus to protest the death sentence against Hashemi Aghajari. It was students' first protest since a court in western Iran re-imposed Aghajari's death sentence.

The original death sentence, handed down in November 2002, sparked nationwide student protests that led to violent clashes with hard-line vigilantes, a key episode in the power struggle between reformists and conservatives in Iran.

The protests ended only when Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered the judiciary to reconsider the verdict. The Supreme Court overturned the death sentence in February 2003 and returned the case to the lower court for review, which reinstated the verdict May 3.

"We will fight this medieval and disgusting verdict," said prominent reformist political activist Mostafa Tajzadeh, drawing applause from the audience. "It's in the interest of conservatives to free the courageous Aghajari and apologize to him."

Hossein Bagheri, a student leader organizing Tuesday's protest, called on Khamenei to explain to the nation why the judiciary was promulgating an appalling picture of Islam and disgracing the Iranian nation through such verdicts.

"We want to hear your explanation on this verdict," Bagheri said, receiving a standing ovation from the students.

Khamenei appoints the head of judiciary. Questioning the supreme leader is still considered a taboo in Iran and punishable by imprisonment.

Aghajari's lawyer, Saleh Nikbakht, said last week Aghajari has vowed not to appeal the sentence - effectively challenging Iran's hard-line judges to execute him and risk massive unrest among Iran's youthful population.

The original sentence came after a court in Hamedan, in western Iran, convicted Aghajari of insulting Islam for questioning the rule of the clerics in a speech he gave to students in the province. The new conviction was for apostasy.

Aghajari's sister, Zohreh Aghajari, who also is a university professor, said the verdict has caused a new brain drain in Iran.

"When the response to an intellectual's opinion is death, then how do you expect the elite not to leave the country because of lack of freedom of speech," she said.

Aghajari, who is now imprisoned in Tehran, was a history professor at Tarbiat-e-Modarres Teachers' Training University in the capital.

President Mohammad Khatami has criticized the court that issued the initial death sentence, saying Aghajari had done more for Iran than "that inexperienced judge who unjustly accused him of apostasy."
3 posted on 05/11/2004 9:04:16 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
The Students...

4 posted on 05/11/2004 9:05:02 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Appeal Court confirms 18-month Jail Sentence Against Journalist Ensafali Hedayat

May 11, 2004
Reporters Without Borders

The Tabriz appeal court on 11 May confirmed an 18-month prison sentence against journalist Ensafali Hedayat. Imprisoned since 16 January 2004, Hedayat has been physically weakened by health problems. He should have been released pending his appeal trial after paying his bail. Reporters Without Borders is particularly concerned about the fact that the journalist has recently started a hunger strike.


Health of imprisoned journalist causes concern, another gets jail sentence

Reporters Without Borders today voiced concern about the state of health of jailed 75-year-old journalist Siamak Pourzand, it deplored the 18-month prison sentence just passed on freelance journalist Ensafali Hedayat, and it voiced outrage at the UN Human Rights Commission's failure to condemn the Islamic Republic during its 60th session.

The organisation warned that Pourzand's life could be in great danger if he is not released immediately and given appropriate treatment. He has been paralysed for months and suffered a heart attack on 31 March that left him in a coma for 36 hours.

The refusal to free him on medical grounds suggests that the authorities have failed to learn any lesson from the death of photojournalist Zahra Kazemi on 10 July 2003 from a beating received in detention, the organisation said, calling for the release of all 12 journalists currently imprisoned in Iran.

In a continuing crackdown on freedom of expression, Hedayat was sentenced on 14 April by a court in the northwestern town of Tabriz to 18 months in prison, of which a year was for "insulting senior officials of the Islamic Republic" and six months for "propaganda against the regime."

At the same time, the title of "Best Leader of the Year" has just been awarded to Tehran state prosecutor Said Mortazavi, who as head of a "press tribunal" has been responsible for the closure of about 100 newspapers and the arrests of many journalists, and who has been directly implicated in Kazemi's death.

The award of this title to Mortazavi "would be the height of absurdity if the situation were not so tragic," Reporters Without Borders said, adding that the Islamic Republic was just highlighting its arbitrary and repressive nature by celebrating this travesty of justice.

"Amid these sinister developments, it is outrageous that none of the member countries of the UN Human Rights Commission, not even the countries of the European Union, has until now tabled a resolution condemning Iran," Reporters Without Borders added.

A freelance contributor to several independent newspapers, Pourzand has been in prison since 30 March 2003. He is bedridden with osteoarthritis of the neck and disk problems that need an operation. He went into a coma after a heart attack two weeks ago. He spent months in solitary confinement and was forced to confess on television by means of psychological pressure and torture.

Pourzand was previously arrested on 24 November 2001 and sentenced in May 2002 to eight years in prison for "actions against state security and links with monarchists and counter-revolutionaries." He had been allowed home in December 2002 before been returned to prison in March 2003.

Hedayat was arrested on 16 January 2004 on the orders of the Tabriz court when he returned from Germany. He was previously arrested on 16 June 2003 at Tabriz university while covering student protests.

With 12 journalists detained, Iran is the biggest prison for the press in the Middle East.
5 posted on 05/11/2004 9:06:06 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
No doubt that the Mullahs have aided CAs economy.
6 posted on 05/11/2004 9:23:15 PM PDT by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Iran's baby boomers will defeat the ayatollahs

By Nicholas D. Kristof
May 12, 2004, 19:08

If, as the poet Philip Larkin observed, sex began in 1963, it has finally reached Iran over the last year.

True, girls and women can still be imprisoned for going out without proper Islamic dress. But young people are completely redefining such dress so it heightens sex appeal instead of smothering it.

Women are required to cover their hair and to wear either a chador cloak or an overcoat, called a manteau, every time they go out, and these are meant to be black and shapeless. But the latest fashion here in Shiraz, in central Iran, is light, tight and sensual.

"There are some manteaus with slits on the sides up to the armpits," said Mahmoud Salehi, 25, a manteau salesman. "And then there are the 'commando manteaus,' with ties on the legs to show off the hips and an elastic under the breasts to accentuate the bust."

Worse, from the point of view of hard-line mullahs, young women in such clothing aren't getting 74 lashes any more - they're getting dates.

"Parents can't defeat children," Salehi mused. "Children always defeat their parents."

And that's what Iran's baby boomers, a wave of 18 million people 15 to 25 years old, are doing. They will transform their country, just as baby boomers in the West changed America and Europe. I don't think Iran's theocracy can survive them, for I've never been to a country where young people seem more frustrated.

The regime's problem is that Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini exhorted Iranians to have more children, and they responded - today, 60 percent of the population was born after his Iranian revolution. And these young people are determining social mores and carving out a small zone of freedom for themselves.

In one sense, the relaxation in clothing requirements is superficial, and some Iranian women have scolded me for asking them about head scarves when they are more angry about discrimination in divorce, child custody and inheritance rules. But the clothing rules affect every woman every day and raise the central question in Iran's future: Should a few aging male mullahs still determine the most intimate elements of every Iranian's life?

It looks to me as if the revolution is sputtering. The mullahs are refusing to accept real democracy, but they are backing down to popular pressure in some areas. The draft is immensely unpopular, for example, so this year the hard-liners shortened the service requirement. More important, individual Iranians are reclaiming their individuality and their autonomy - and how they dress is the best measure of that.

The morals police no longer order women to cover up stray hairs. These days, the fashion is for brightly colored, glittery see-through scarves, worn halfway back on the head.

"It's possible head scarves will be gone in another year or two, the way things are going," said Amir Suleimani, a scarf salesman in the Tehran Bazaar. "God willing."

No wonder conservative newspapers in Tehran denounce Iranian women for strolling around "nude."

The baby boomers include Saghar Tayebi, a 17-year-old in Isfahan who wore a tight manteau with high slits, embroidered jeans and a red headband. Her mascara was hefty and her lipstick bold, and her sleeves were rolled up to reveal lots of bracelets. Lots of hair escaped her scarf. But when I asked her whether she dreamed of wearing Western-style skimpy clothing, she looked aghast.

"We totally reject that," she said indignantly. "We don't want that freedom."

Young people want to remain good Muslims, and some are happy enough in an Islamic republic - but above all, they want to laugh and love. Many are not overtly political, nor sure exactly what kind of government they want, but they do know that this isn't it.

"We want fun," declared Tannaz Haj Hosseini, 20, a university student who was out with her boyfriend in Tehran. "There's no joy here."

I protested that her nail polish and see-through scarf - not to mention the boyfriend - underscored the progress in Iran. A few years ago, she would have been lashed.

"I don't compare myself with 10 years ago," she said. "I compare myself to what I could have and don't."

Ayatollahs, look out.

7 posted on 05/11/2004 9:34:25 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Aghajari's lawyer, Saleh Nikbakht, said last week Aghajari has vowed not to appeal the sentence - effectively challenging Iran's hard-line judges to execute him and risk massive unrest among Iran's youthful population.

Brave man! When Iran is free (tomorrow would work for me) they really need to honor him.
8 posted on 05/11/2004 9:59:14 PM PDT by Valin (Hating people is like burning down your house to kill a rat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; McGavin999; freedom44; nuconvert; sionnsar; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; onyx; Pro-Bush; ...
Overdosing on Islam

Published: May 12, 2004
The NYTimes

QOM, Iran — In the offices of an ayatollah here, I was jokingly introduced as coming from the Great Satan.

"Humph," a young man responded immediately. "America is only Baby Satan. We have Big Satan right here at home."

Turbans to the left, turbans to the right — Qom is the religious center of Iran, but even here, there is anger and disquiet. One of the central questions for the Middle East is whether Iran's hard-line Islamic regime will survive. I'm betting it won't.

"Either officials change their methods and give freedom to the people, and stop interfering in elections, or the people will rise up with another revolution," Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri told me.

"There is no freedom," added Ayatollah Montazeri, who is among the senior figures in the Shiite world but is excluded from power in Iran because of his reformist ideas. "Repression is carried out in the name of Islam, and that turns people off. . . . All these court summonses, newspaper closings and prosecutions of dissidents are wrong. These are the same things that were done under the shah and are now being repeated. And now they are done in the name of Islam and therefore alienate people."

Whoa! Ayatollah Montazeri was a leader of the Islamic Revolution, and was initially designated by his close friend Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to be his successor as supreme leader of Iran. Everything he says carries immense credibility, for he is a more senior religious figure than any of Iran's present leaders. (I've posted comments by Ayatollah Montazeri, along with a video of the interview, at, Posting 389.)

Another Shiite leader outside the club of power, Ayatollah Jalaledin Taheri, has denounced the regime as "society's dregs and fascists who consist of a concoction of ignorance and madness. . . . [and] those who are convinced that yogurt is black."

So the Islamic Republic is increasingly vulnerable to the most devastating accusation of all: that it is un-Islamic and is alienating its youth from Islam. The mullahs have even made beards unpopular.

"I'm sorry — I've been too busy to shave recently," said Ashkan Almasi, a musician, mortified at having a faint beard and not wanting me to get the wrong idea about his politics. "In contrast to what [leading Islamic philosophers] say, this regime is the very opposite of Islamic government," Mr. Almasi said. "It has made Islam unpopular."

On the 1,100-mile round trip between Tehran and Shiraz in the south, I did meet some staunch supporters of the regime. But my experience at a teahouse in a small town was more typical. With a small crowd around me, I asked people what they thought of the government.

"How can you have hope for life any more?" said Abdullah Erfani, a plumber, adding, "If there were a free vote, 99 percent would oppose this system, and only the 1 percent within the system would support it."

A 20-year-old, Hadi Zareai, working hard to look cool in his leather jacket, said: "There will be a Judgment Day, and all of us will meet up. Then I'm going to find those who launched the Islamic Revolution and go after them."

In much of the world, young Muslims are increasingly religious, but compulsive Islam has soured some Iranians on religion. Fewer people go to Friday prayers, and Western-style clothes are the hottest fashion.

One young woman I met, Elaheh Falakmasir, is religious and inclined to support the regime. But smoke was almost pouring from her ears because she and a couple of friends had been kicked out of an exhibition a few hours earlier for being floozies: one wore a red vest over her black overcoat, and Ms. Falakmasir herself wore a silver nose stud.

"I like it," she said hotly. "It's beautiful. God likes it. But they complained." And so the regime alienated three more constituents who want to be good Muslims — but also want to live in a modern world.

There's a useful lesson here for George Bush's America as well as for the ayatollahs' Iran: when a religion is imposed on people, when a government tries too ostentatiously to put itself "under God," the effect is often not to prop up religious faith but to undermine it. Nothing is more lethal to religious faith than having self-righteous, intolerant politicians (who wince at nose studs) drag God into politics.
9 posted on 05/12/2004 3:06:49 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
How much of Iran's population are radical Muslim?
10 posted on 05/12/2004 3:08:33 AM PDT by onyx (Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
11 posted on 05/12/2004 3:17:02 AM PDT by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx
There are radical people in any community in this world. But Iranians are more secular and open minded. I can't give you any number on how many of them are radical. Most Not As I Believe!
12 posted on 05/12/2004 3:19:29 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; Smartass
Ping on #9!
13 posted on 05/12/2004 3:47:04 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Free Iran bump! If the regime is losing support even in Qom, stick a fork in it, cause it's done.
14 posted on 05/12/2004 4:25:50 AM PDT by Heatseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; All
Grand Ayatollah Hosein-Ali Montazeri

15 posted on 05/12/2004 5:06:25 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot; All

"Grand Ayatollah Hosein-Ali Montazeri welcomed me for an interview in his office in Qom, Iran, with a few words in English and a nice, folksy manner. Later, we tried to communicate in Arabic: I spoke to him a bit in Cairo colloquial Arabic, and as far as I can tell he couldn’t understand a word, and then he replied in Quranic Arabic that I couldn’t understand a word of. Because it’s not often that you hear a Grand Ayatollah saying that Iran is as bad now as under the shah, I’ve made a partial transcript of the translation from Farsi."

"In an interview with Nicholas D. Kristof in Qom, Iran, Grand Ayatollah Hosein-Ali Montazeri said that the current government is pushing the people toward another revolution."

"These gentlemen became dominant in this country in the name of Islam. They do what they do in the name of Islam. All this repression, all these convictions, are done in the name of Islam. Islam is presented as a tough and harsh religion. And the young may well be turned off by that. The style of these gentlemen has caused it. And they should rethink how they do things and give more freedom to the young."

"There is no freedom. Repression is carried out in the name of Islam, and that turns people off. Young people in their heart are naturally interested in religion. It’s instinct. …but violence and harsh actions, arrests and court summons, done in the name of religion turn people off. Officials should reexamine and change their practice."

Here's the link to the video........
16 posted on 05/12/2004 5:15:48 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
U.S. wonders how much trouble is the fault of Iran

The Associated Press
WEDNESDAY, May 12, 2004
The Salt Lake Tribune

WASHINGTON -- Reports from inside Iraq continue to suggest that Iran's conservative Islamic government is meddling in the affairs of its neighbor, according to U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to information about the instability there.
Yet as of late last month, the U.S.-led coalition held only 15 Iranian prisoners, according to the U.S. military command in Baghdad. Officials are struggling to pin down exactly what role Iran may be playing in the chaos still roiling military forces in Iraq.
Some think Iran is operating simply as any worried neighbor would: keeping tabs on the affairs of a tumultuous nation with which it shares a 900-mile border. Iran's critics contend Tehran is stirring up trouble and laying groundwork to try to establish an Islamic republic on the Iranian model after the United States and its allies leave Iraq. Others say the truth lies in between.
Senior officials including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld have warned Iran not to get involved.
"We know the Iranians have been meddling, and it's unhelpful to have neighboring countries meddling in the affairs of Iraq," Rumsfeld said last month at a Pentagon briefing.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi has repeatedly denied U.S. allegations that Iran is meddling in Iraq.
Senate Intelligence Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kansas, has said Iran has "obvious designs on the future of Iraq." So, too, says another member, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.: "There is some Iranian effort to influence events."
Majorities in both countries belong to the Shiite sect of Islam, although Iraq's Shiites were dominated under former President Saddam Hussein by the Sunni sect. Iraq and Iran fought in the 1980s.

That the situation inside Iran is complex may be adding to the difficulty in unraveling what, if anything, Iran is doing in Iraq, said Rasool Nafisi in Washington, an Iranian-American in regular contact with both reformers and hard-liners in Iran.
Robert Baer, a former Iraq-based CIA officer who left the agency in 1997, said Tehran probably is delighted that Saddam was overthrown and his Sunni followers disenfranchised. The ruling Shiites in Iran have ties with Iraq's Shiite majority.
But the Iranian government probably is unnerved by the U.S. presence in Iraq and by American goals, Baer said.
"They do not want to see a secular, democratic, pro-Western government in Iraq with 12 American bases," Baer said. "They will assume these bases are meant to interfere in Iran."
17 posted on 05/12/2004 5:28:10 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; All
Fighting Muqtada Al-Sadr - A description of the mission from one of our soldiers.

"He vigorously pursued courting and forming alliances with Iranian hard-liners"
"Now Sadr's patrons and mentor in Iran are breaking from him. Grand Ayatollah Hossain Kazzam Haeri in Qom, Iran, is no longer backing him and has instead made it clear that Sadr's uprising is not sanctioned. Haeri is his mentor, and was a close intimate to Sadr's respectable father. The Teheran Times has run stories that are largely exaggerated, but still are making clear that Sadr's uprising is counter to Iranian interests and does not have the support of even one of Iran's grand statesman, Hashemi Rafsanjani."

(For entire piece see....
"I Ask That the American People Be Brave"

Thanks Valin
18 posted on 05/12/2004 8:21:58 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; AdmSmith; McGavin999; freedom44; downer911; Cindy; Dolphy
Airport debacle is 'bad for Iran'

BBC News
Wednesday, 12 May, 2004

The forced closure of Iran's foreign-owned new airport is a big blow to investor confidence in the country, analysts have said.
Named after the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the new Tehran airport was built and expected to be run by Turkish and Austrian consortium TAV.

Yet the Iranian army closed it down on Saturday, citing that its foreign ownership was a security concern.

The army also criticised what it said were TAV's business links with Israel.

As a result of the closure, airlines have been forced to re-route flights to Tehran's congested Mehrabad airport, which the $475m new facility, 30 miles south of the city, was meant to replace.

"It's a bit of a joke... you can't give out a contract and then do this," said Dr Ali Ansari, lecturer in Iranian studies at Exeter University and fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Contract difficulties

"It's clearly going to have a negative impact on investor confidence," he says.

"There are potentially lucrative deals [in Iran] but the legal framework is lacking and until the government sorts that out, foreign companies aren't going to be interested in the way the government would like them to be."

The Iranian authorities declared the closure illegal and threatened legal action against "irresponsible officials".

But Iran's armed forces said the decision to entrust the airport's operation to a foreign company "threatens the security of the country as well as its dignity".

"Unfortunately airport officials took this untimely decision without taking into account either security constraints or the Supreme Council law on national security banning the use of foreign forces," a statement said.

The government has reportedly promised the consortium compensation; TAV said it had invested $15m in the deal.

The affair was "not a good sign", given the proximity of the 2005 presidential elections, particularly as conservatives forced out reformists in February's parliamentary poll, a Western diplomat told AFP news agency.

Concerns would be heightened if the incident was repeated, given Iran's investment climate is currently "moderately positive", said a locally-based economist.

Meanwhile, Turkey said trade ties with Iran could suffer.

"Our economic relations could be influenced negatively by this situation," a spokesman for the Turkish foreign ministry Namik Tan told correspondents on Wednesday.

He said talks were being held concerning the issue.

In 2003, Turkey's imports from Iran - made up of mainly oil and gas - amounted to $1.8bn while exports totalled $524m.

Iran 'red-faced'

The Iranian press were damning of the affair.

"The nation is left red-faced on the international scene," said the pro-reform Iran Daily.

"Can't we even do a simple thing such as putting an airport into operation without getting bogged down in useless controversy or complicating the issue?" it asked.

"Shouldn't those in charge be concerned how the rest of the world looks at us at a time when we are simultaneously striving hard to enter the global market and wooing foreign investment."

"Unfortunately in the case of the IKIA (Imam Khomeini International Airport) we have been very successful in managing to portray our system as incompetent, mismanaged and lacking in professionalism."

But according to Dr Zhand Shakibi, lecturer in the Department of Government at the London School of Economics, foreign investors will still view Iran with interest.

"Conservatives want investment in the country, especially in the energy field... which they control," he said.

"The airport was a bit different, especially given its name... For them, Khomeini was against imperialism and foreign investment."
19 posted on 05/12/2004 8:35:33 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (John ''Fedayeen" sKerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Iran Approves Torture Ban Amid High-Profile Cases

May 12, 2004
The Washington Times
From Combined Dispatches

TEHRAN — Iran's ruling Guardian Council has passed a law banning the use of torture, effective immediately, a judiciary official announced this week.

The council, which rejected at least three similar proposals in the past, approved the law last Thursday, a day after Iran's judiciary chief ordered it, said Nasser Hosseini, the judiciary official.

"For courts, it's obligatory to implement the law after it is approved by the Guardian Council," he said.

Human rights groups long have complained about the use of torture against detainees, including intellectuals and political activists.

"I hope the law provides enough protection for prisoners who have complained about torture," said lawmaker Rajab Ali Mazroui, a reformer.

Iran's bleak human rights record was highlighted by the case of Iranian-Canadian photojournalist Zahra Kazemi, 54, who died last July, about three weeks after being detained for taking photographs outside a Tehran prison during demonstrations.

She was posthumously honored last Saturday in Vancouver by the Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ), which named Mrs. Kazemi this year's recipient of its President's Award for exemplary contributions to the craft of journalism. Her son, Stephan Hachemi, accepted the award on her behalf. At its convention, the CAJ renewed its demand that Toronto push Tehran for justice in the death of Mrs. Kazemi and to respect her family's wishes by returning her remains to Canada.

In a separate challenge to Iran's hard-line religious courts, the attorney for an academic sentenced to death for blasphemy said yesterday that he might persuade his client to again appeal the verdict, which has provoked protests at home and condemnation abroad.

Hashem Aghajari has refused to appeal the sentence, reissued by a provincial court last week, effectively challenging the hard-line judiciary to hang him for saying Muslims should not blindly follow senior clerics "like monkeys."

His wife, Zahra Behnoudi, told reporters Monday that Mr. Aghajari remains defiant.

"Free me unconditionally, or carry out the sentence. I will not appeal in order for you to lose my case again in an administrative labyrinth," she quoted him as saying. "I refuse to sign the notification of the verdict, and I refuse to appeal."

She said her husband had told her that the verdict, a confirmation of one handed down by the same judge in the western city of Hamadan, was dated last August, although it was made public only last week.

This second sentence ignored objections raised by the Supreme Court to the original decision, newspapers quoted Mr. Aghajari's attorney, Saleh Nikbakht, as saying.

The Hamadan judge failed to "clear any points that were signaled as shortcomings by the Supreme Court," he said.

"The judge has issued the ruling without clearing up those deficiencies ... and this amounts to a ruling against the Supreme Court," Mr. Nikbakht contended.

Iran's top judicial authorities are thought to be anxious to avoid a repetition of the protests at home and abroad that occurred after the original death sentence was handed down against Mr. Aghajari, a disabled veteran of the Iran-Iraq war.

The Hamadan court found Mr. Aghajari had committed blasphemy in a speech in that city, and so, in line with Islamic and Iranian law, he deserved to die.

The speech struck at the core of Iran's 25-year-old Islamic regime, calling for a reformation in the state religion and asserting that Muslims "should not blindly follow" religious leaders.

Powerful hard-liners saw this as an assault on the Shi'ite doctrine of "emulation" and of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's status as supreme leader.

After demonstrations by students and protests by reformists in the government over the death sentence, the Ayatollah Khamenei demanded that it be reviewed. In January 2003, the Supreme Court ordered a retrial.

Mr. Aghajari also was sentenced to eight years in jail. That term later was commuted to four years before being scrapped on April 14, but he is still being held in Tehran's Evin prison.

Judicial officials said last week the new Hamadan verdict is not final and would be reviewed again by the Supreme Court.

The judiciary recently issued directives banning torture and ill-treatment of prisoners and guaranteeing the rights of citizens, in what was seen as an admission that abuses exist.

The directives were given the force of law by the outgoing pro-reform parliament, strengthening existing legislation, in a move that was endorsed on Monday after a review by the hard-line Guardian Council.
20 posted on 05/12/2004 8:55:42 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Iran to Put Up Chemical Snipe at Germans on Friday

May 12, 2004
Khaleej Times Online

TEHERAN - Iranian authorities will erect a plaque outside the German embassy Friday denouncing Germany’s contribution to Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons arsenal, in the latest tit-for-tat measure in a diplomatic spat between Berlin and Iran’s clerical leaders, the official IRNA news agency said.

Teheran’s conservative-controlled municipality gave the order on April 27 to put up the plaque, a direct response to the unveiling the week before of a plaque in Berlin denouncing Iran for the 1992 murders there of four Kurdish dissidents.

“We will put up the plaque to commemorate the chemical weapons victims in front of the German embassy on Friday,” the head of the city council, Mehdi Chamran, was quoted as saying by IRNA.

The ceremony will be attended by the members of Teheran’s City Council, the government and military officials and veterans of the bloody 1980-1988 war against Saddam’s Iraq who were victims of chemical weapons.

Chamran added that the purpose of the plaque is to “support the chemical weapons victims, and to condemn the German government who sold the technology and the weapons of mass destruction to the Baathist regime of Saddam.”

“Germany and the other oppressing countries are collectively responsible for theses crimes and we want the Germans to question their government,” Chamran added.

He also insisted that, “the German government must apologize to the Iranian nation, especially to the victims of the chemical weapons and their family.”

Nearly a month ago, local officials in Berlin’s upmarket Charlottenburg district unveiled a plaque marking the 1992 attack in the Mykonos restaurant. It carries the victims’ names and the words: ”Murdered by the then regime in Iran. They died fighting for freedom and human rights”.

A German court concluded in 1997 that the killers of the four Iranian Kurds were acting on Teheran’s orders, prompting the German government to recall its ambassador and the European Union to suspend dialogue with the Islamic republic for a year.

Germany’s ambassador to Iran, Baron Paul von Maltzahn, has already been summoned to the foreign ministry to hear of Iran’s ”strong objection” to the plaque and hear fresh denials of a state link to the murders.

Last month the German embassy said Teheran’s authorities briefly closed down a German government-funded language institute in Teheran, ostensibly because the centre did not have the necessary permits to operate.

Along with several Western and Arab powers, Germany provided key assistance to Saddam during his war with Iran, in which close to a million people were killed.

A number of German chemical companies are believed to have been key suppliers of components for the ousted Iraqi leader’s chemical arsenal used against Iranian forces.
21 posted on 05/12/2004 8:56:22 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Koizumi's Envoy Seeks Iran's Cooperation

May 12, 2004
Kyodo News
Japon Today

TEHRAN -- Former Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura, who is visiting Iran as Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's special envoy, on Tuesday sought Iran's cooperation in the reconstruction of Iraq ahead of the transfer of power to the Iraqis in June, Japanese officials said.

Komura made the request to Iranian President Mohammad Khatami during their talks in Tehran, and handed him Koizumi's letter to that end, the officials said.
22 posted on 05/12/2004 8:57:05 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Iran's Accession to WMD Impossible

May 12, 2004
Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting

Moscow -- Iranian access to the atomic bomb is "impossible," said a Russian Foreign Ministry official who was quoted here Wednesday by a local paper.

The paper, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, reported in its Wednesday edition that the Russian foreign first deputy ministry Vyacheslav Trubnikov also branded as "unfounded" US allegations Iran is attempting to build an atomic bomb.

The US accusation that Iran is on the verge of building an atomic bomb stems primarily from Israeli intelligence (Mossad) reports that have warned Europeans and Americans Iran is capable of producing an atomic bomb, the paper further quoted Trubnikov.< br>
The truth is, Trubnikov went on to say, there is absolutely no way Iran can build an atomic bomb as the country does not have the capability to do so."

He said he thinks the Israeli fear of Iran's atomic power is understandable, but pointed out that "what is important is that Israel has atomic bombs but we easily turn a blind eye to this fact."

Rejecting the possibility of Iran using its Bushehr nuclear power plant for military purposes or to build nuclear weapons, Trubnikov pointed out that Tehran's active cooperation with the International Atomic Watchdog (IAEA) should have, by far, removed all concerns in this regard.
23 posted on 05/12/2004 8:57:48 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Jailed Iranian Journalist Goes on Hunger Strike

May 12, 2004

TEHRAN -- Iranian journalist Ensafali Hedayat, who was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of insulting regime leaders and writing propaganda against the Islamic republic, has started a hunger strike, his lawyer told AFP Wednesday.

"Ensafali Hedayat has been on hunger strike since Tuesday morning to protest the judiciary refusal to set him free on bail, as was decided by the court," his lawyer Mohammad Ali Dadkhah said.

"He has also refused to undergo an operation for his ulcer problem, though the physicians urged him to," he added.

The revolutionary tribunal in the northwestern city of Tabriz, which condemned Hedayat on April 15, decided to grant him bail until his sentence was confirmed by the Supreme Court.

Dadkhah added that there was no news of the confirmation of the sentence.

The Human Rights Defense Circle, which is run by the Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi, said that Hedayat's detention is "illegal", and called for his freedom.

The Paris-based Reporters sans Frontieres journalists' rights group said that he "is not in a good condition, and he is getting weaker."

Hedayat arrested on January 16 on the orders of the hardline revolutionary court, which tries ideological and religious offences.

The court did not uphold further charges of spying and participation in an opposition group meeting.

Hedayat had already been arrested at the University of Tabriz in June 2003 following his coverage of student-led demonstrations. He had been accused of inciting anti-regime protests, but was freed after three weeks in custody.

He subsequently wrote a letter of complaint over maltreatment to reformist President Mohammad Khatami.

Around 12 journalists are currently in jail in Iran.

The Islamic republic's hardline-run judiciary has also in recent years shut down more than 100 publications, most of them pro-reform.
24 posted on 05/12/2004 8:58:27 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
EU Delegation Heads to Syria

May 12, 2004
Saudi Press Agency

BRUSSELS, Belgium -- Ignoring Washington's get-tough approach, a high-level trade delegation led by the European Union's top energy and transport official will visit Syria this weekend seeking to improve cooperation on exporting oil and gas to Europe, the EU head office announced Wednesday.

European Commissioner Loyola de Palacio was to head Thursday to Lebanon and to Damascus on Sunday to meet with Syrian President Bashar Assad, Prime Minister Mohammed Naji Otri and other government officials.

The European Commission said the meetings would deal specifically with "Syria's integration in the regional petroleum market and its future transit role toward the EU for Egyptian, Iraqi and Middle Eastern oil and gas resources."

De Palacio would also discuss the opening up of Syria's energy market and include talks on aviation security and safety.
25 posted on 05/12/2004 8:59:22 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
US Imposes Economic Sanctions on Syria

May 12, 2004
The Financial Times
Salamander Davoudi

The US government imposed sanctions on Syria on Tuesday for failing to deter terrorist activities within its borders or halt the flow of insurgents and weapons into Iraq.

But the sanctions were weaker than expected, with the Bush administration stopping short of an expected ban on investment in Syria. US oil investments there are estimated to be worth m (£338m).

"US oil companies will be relieved as the sanctions are milder than expected," a Washington oil analyst said.

The decision had been delayed several months, underlining US concern that it might exacerbate regional tensions. But it was finally taken after pressure from Congress in recent weeks.

Under the Syria Accountability Act, a ban will be placed on US exports to Syria, excluding items including aircraft parts, telecommunications equipment, some software and technology, food, medicine and information materials.

Restrictions will be placed on banking relations with the Syrian national bank, CBS.

The US Treasury designated it as a financial institution of "primary money laundering concern" and proposed that US financial institutions be prohibited from holding accounts there.

The Treasury also criticised Damascus for not transfering proceeds generated from the illicit sale of Iraqi oil to the development fund for Iraq as required by the United Nations.

The department has been authorised to freeze the assets of Syrian nationals or entities suspected of involvement in terrorism.

Syria has said that the sanctions will harm US interests and has urged dialogue.

The sanctions also ban the already limited number of flights to and from the US.
26 posted on 05/12/2004 9:00:21 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
For those interested in how the US military is dealing with the fallout of the Abu Ghraib fiasco, I just received a copy of an email a US Airman received from his superiors...

"Chiefs, this is a message that General Hornburg has asked for your help in ensuring our Airmen at every level receive.

While during these complex and troubling days, some of your Airmen might feel like hanging their heads and even become somewhat depressed over the events that are now unfolding due to the breaking news about the abuse of Iraqi prisoners. However, he has asked each of us on his senior staff to let our Airmen know how proud he is of the way they have conducted themselves, and the dedicated service they've rendered during these difficult times.

While we can't and should not ignore what has transpired behind the walls of Abu Ghraib prison, we can and will learn from it; thus ensuring that we do not repeat the same mistakes. Our first core value: Integrity First must always be our guide in how we treat all we come in contact with; whether they are friend or refugee, comrade or prisoner.

Even though, there is a sense of shame and dishonor concerning what took place behind prison walls at Abu Ghraib... It is because we have repeatedly stressed the preeminence of our "first core value" into the hearts and minds of Airmen, over the last decade, that we are able to hold our heads up high today.

While we empathize with our Army brethren as they endure what will certainly turn out to be extremely difficult days in the near term. We must remind them and ourselves, that these unethical breeches were carried out by a very few misguided individuals. We know that the vast majority of Soldiers, Sailors, Marines and Airmen have conducted themselves with the dignity and honor; that in the truest sense, best represent the highest traditions of America's Armed Forces.

Additionally, it is times such as these that every Airmen must recommit themselves to what has made the United States Air Force one of the greatest forces for good that God has ever allowed a military to become: Our core values of Integrity; Service; Excellence! (ISE!)

General Hornburg wants every Airman, everywhere, to know that he could not be more proud of their service, sacrifice and moral conduct as they fight to keep America free. To liberate those who have yet to taste true democracy, or understand the values that has made our nation strong, yet compassionate. Forceful, yet temperate; while always seeking justice for all, especially in countries where there has seldom been justice at all.

You will see more of General Hornburg's thoughts on this issue in days to come, but in the mean time; He sends his best regards and sincere thanks to each of you, and asks that you pass this message on... up and down the chain.

May God continue to bless you all, as you serve our great nation."
27 posted on 05/12/2004 9:18:03 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
This just in from a student inside of Iran...

"I was at university today for my classes this morning.
All of us disgusted to hear the news of beheading that American citizen in Iraq.

We feel sorry for those who think that killing innocent people is the way to achieve their so-called holy goals.

We, some Iranian students, stand united with our American friends in their war against Terrorisam and Radicalism and we do support them as possible as we can."
28 posted on 05/12/2004 9:20:50 AM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Let Freedom Ring ~ bump!
29 posted on 05/12/2004 9:37:05 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Just a tad self-serving, I'd say.
30 posted on 05/12/2004 10:35:36 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx
We can base it on #'s from actual election between the reformists v. hard-liners [the original election]
80% voted for reformists and about 12% for Hard-liners.

So i guess 12%
31 posted on 05/12/2004 11:03:53 AM PDT by Cyrus the Great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cyrus the Great
Good to know.
32 posted on 05/12/2004 12:31:27 PM PDT by onyx (Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Thanks for the ping!
33 posted on 05/12/2004 1:19:37 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Some photos to go along with post#7

Street Fashion May 09, 2004 Here is what Nicholas Kristof has been talking about in his latest New York Times column, Those Sexy Iranians. No one has challenged the cleric's rule more effectively than these young Iranian girls. They have totally changed the Islamic dress code during the past five years. The half-sliced heads of the mannequins are results of Islamic laws that prohibit making identical statues to humans.

34 posted on 05/12/2004 2:31:06 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Journalists in exile May 06, 2004 In Summer 2002 I went back to Tehran and paid a visit to Hayat-e No the newspaper I used to work with. My friends, Sina Motallebi (right) and Nikahang Kowsar (left), both now bloggers in exile, used to work there too. Sina spent 23 days in jail because of his writings last year and after a few months left Iran for good. He is now in Netherlands with his wife and a little boy.

35 posted on 05/12/2004 2:36:41 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ...( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
EU's Control of European Media

It's often said that the media influences the public opinions.That's more than true.That's a true fact..

The Media system influences the Italian Public Opinion as well.

It's not surprising that 73% of the Italians now wish our troops back home.

They speak based on what they see and hear on the TV.

It's clear that the Truth is being held secret.

Why is this way ?

Why so much censorship?

Why such a lack of objectivity and Freedom of Information?

All i may say is that none should deny the fact that our Media lack objectivity.

Recently,the European Press has been critized for the lack of objectivity and Pluralism.

Italy was the country that got much of the blame.

The criticism was legittimate and right.

To deny the ordinary people the right to see and know the alternative story other than that usually described by the Official Media;to deny them to listen to fair and balanced reports means that there is no Freedom of Press at all and Censorship is a routine.

The powerful lobby of the Journalists monitors the work of their fellows.

The order issued would be : 'be as more politically correct as possible.'

The very Union of the Journalists,which in Italy holds a tight control of the Media system at whole, is in fact a mere Puppet of the European Union.

In order to better understand how the entire system works,let me analyze why is this way.

To begin with,most Italians are sentimentally tied to the European Union.At least they are regarding the Union's role in the world scenario.

They see it as a counter-weight to the U.S. (indeed it wish to become like that ),that might 'challenge the American hegemony'.

The Italians,as well as their fellow Europeans,are culturally adversaries to the U.S. and his policy.

As a part of such a culture,it's not hard to find Italians from various political backgrounds,right and left,that back EU against what they see as the "sole superpower in this world'.

As it is not hard to find this sort of people,so it's not whether you watch TV or read daily newspapers over here even only 1 week.

Yes, i mean the Journalists and the so-called Media.

So it happens to watch news from a supposed "right-wing" channel or a supposed "fair and balanced" one and notice the same politically correct political line.

That is the official one which is adopted by the EU.

For that reason,there's no difference between one channel and another.

It's anti-Bush and anti-Israel rhetoric and propaganda.

Sometimes,it might not be visible,that means that of course they won't say it openly but you can notice their rhetoric and bias.

It's enough to see which news they tell you and how they tell them.

Let me make some exemples.

Iraq: it's a daily count of tragedies and killings of American or Coalition forces.

It looks like there is an entire population that has turned against the "invader".

It looks like there are only American and Coalition dead and not,as it is in the sad reality,dozens of innocent iraqis.

Again,it looks like the images of daily attacks is all is going on over there. They did not report about the anti-terror demos in Baghdada earlier one March.

2 days ago,none has reported of a demo in the city of Samawa not against the "occupiers",but in favor of them and in that specific case,the japanese troops.

They do not report of the huge efforts by the Coalition members to repari schools,hospital,pipelines,giving jobs and good salary to the Iraq citizens,etc,etc..

They say nothing of the fact that more than 200 newspapers of different political areas as well as independents,have so far been pubblished.

Elections were held in small local communities...

Nothing to do..

It's only bad news.At least,this is what they want you to know.

Oh yes,here we come.

When it comes to America and Bush,reporters from NYC tell of how troubled Bush is.Sometimes they have used to quote Polls in support of their thesis.

Yet,ultimately they're not doing so.. maybe they don't want you to know the good performance that Bush is facing in the polls.

They judged it unappropriate to tell this to the public.

The number of the lies is countless.

I do not know if such a situation is the same as in other countries's media,but it is so ridicule and at the same time sad and unfortunate to think of such a bad part of this people that is the Italian's.

That really makes me so upset.

36 posted on 05/12/2004 2:56:07 PM PDT by Stefania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Stefania












37 posted on 05/12/2004 2:57:25 PM PDT by Stefania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Thanks for the ping.
38 posted on 05/12/2004 3:00:12 PM PDT by Dolphy (I joined the redlipstick boycott of MSNBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

I'm Jihad Fedayeen Kerimenei and I approved this fascist POS.

39 posted on 05/12/2004 3:45:30 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
Good question. Bet it is small but in all the power positions with the guns.
40 posted on 05/12/2004 5:23:15 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
This thread is now closed.

Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”

41 posted on 05/12/2004 9:02:06 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson