Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inspector: Saddam had WMD on 'short notice'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, May 12, 2004

Posted on 05/12/2004 12:06:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

A document leaked by U.S. inspectors presents hard evidence Saddam Hussein could have unleashed biological and chemical weapons on foreign nations "at short notice."

The report by Charles Duelfer, the new director of the Iraq Survey group, said there is evidence the ousted Iraqi dictator was plotting to expand his facilities last year, before the invasion of British and American troops, the Scotsman reported.

Duelfer presents what he calls "new information" on Saddam's military build-up, the newspaper said.

"Iraq did have facilities suitable for the production of biological and chemical agents needed for weapons," Duelfer states. "It had plans to improve and expand and even build new facilities."

The report refers to new evidence testing was done on long-range ballistic missiles and on a commercial biopesticide, which can be used as anthrax.

Duelfer's report, which has been sent to Congress, is his first after taking over in February for David Kay.

Critics of the war already have questioned Duelfer's findings, charging the new inspector has changed the criteria for finding weapons of mass destruction, shifting from hard evidence to signs of "intent."

The numerous United Nations resolutions passed before the war put the burden of proof on Saddam Hussein to demonstrate he did not have the weapons or the programs.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., has challenged the CIA, controller of the survey group, to declassify Duelfer's entire five-page report, the Scotsman said.

"Mr. Duelfer's statement," said Levin, "is written to express the author's 'suspicions' as to Iraq's activities relating to possible weapons of mass destruction programs or activities while leaving out information in the classified report which points away from his suspicions."

Duelfer says in his report the survey team's task is made difficult by the reluctance of former government officials to talk about their role in the weapons programs.

"There is a fear former regime supporters would exact retribution," the report says.

But the group, it continues, received "intriguing" reports about concealed stockpiles of weapons.

Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin said Monday he believes Saddam had WMD and they've fallen into terrorists' hands, making the threat of terrorism greater now than in the wake of 9-11, Canada's Sun Media reported.

"The fact is that there is now, we know well, a proliferation of nuclear weapons, and that many weapons that Saddam Hussein had, we don't know where they are," Martin told a crowd of about 700 university researchers and business leaders in Montreal. "That means terrorists have access to all of that."

Martin, with the backing of President Bush, is lobbying the international community to form an informational organization to address world issues such as terrorism.

"I believe that terrorism will be, for our generation, what the Cold War was to generations that preceded us," he said. "I don't think we're out of it yet."

Martin's comments on the root of terrorism contrasted with the views of his predecessor, Jean Chretien, who blamed it on poverty.

"The cause of terrorism is not poverty," Martin said, "it is hatred."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist

1 posted on 05/12/2004 12:06:41 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Well naturally Duelfer is most certainly making it all up. Canadian PM Paul Martin is just a Bush poodle like Tony Blair. And Laurie Mylroie, Steven Hayes, George Tenet, and most of the top intelligence gathering agencies in the world all concocted stories about Saddam Hussein being a bad person who had WMDs with plans to use or distribute them to terrorists. At least that is what the libs would like us to believe.
2 posted on 05/12/2004 12:19:51 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless
The background for WMD status at this time was: Saddam was desperately working, pleading with other countries to support him in having the UN restraints lifted and for the UN to get out of Iraq. This was in the two year period BEFORE our resolution. Kofi had approached Saddam and said he wouldn't agree to give us any info on anything concerning weapons, i.e., he wouldn't cooperate in any way. I remember Kofi's face when he said this....kinda like....gee, I am so disappointed with Saddam. However, if we weren't on the Security Council, I believe the UN would have left Iraq AT THAT TIME with no further investigation.
3 posted on 05/12/2004 2:58:53 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I hope Saddam had no stockpiles of weapons. There's no doubt he had the intent and the capability. If he had no stockpiles, and that's a huge if, it means we went in at the right time. If he had stockpiles, we went in too late, because God knows where they are now and I shudder to think who may have access to them.
4 posted on 05/12/2004 6:05:19 AM PDT by alnick (Mrs. Heinz-Kerry's husband wants teh-rayz-ah your taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alnick; Mia T
Excellent, and worrisome, point.
5 posted on 05/12/2004 8:06:35 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Those who so piteously and unceasingly lament there not being immediate discovery of WMD's never mention or apparently consider one thing: That is the wonderful fact that WMD's were not utilized against our men and women when they went into Iraq. On this basis - the one that counts above all others - they ought to be glad. And damn thankful.
6 posted on 05/12/2004 8:19:04 AM PDT by mtntop3 ("Those who must know before they believe will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump, personally surprised by Martin's apparent clarity on this.
7 posted on 05/12/2004 8:58:08 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless
Yeah, Hans Blix couldn't find his ass if it wasn't attached, but as far as the left is concerned he's Sherlock Holmes.
8 posted on 05/12/2004 6:19:59 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Shermy
The report refers to new evidence testing was done on long-range ballistic missiles and on a commercial biopesticide, which can be used as anthrax.

The newswriters at WND appear to be just as ignorant of biological science as the ones at AP.

"Biopesticide" and "anthrax" simply don't belong in the same sentence...

9 posted on 05/12/2004 6:24:05 PM PDT by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
A "just war" ping.
10 posted on 05/12/2004 6:26:25 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson