Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Symantec Scrambles to Fix Firewall Flaws (for Norton users)
InternetNews.com ^ | May 13, 2004 | Ryan Naraine

Posted on 05/13/2004 4:03:11 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: JoJo Gunn

well, remember all those spam emails advertising Norton Anti Virus 2002? A ton of people bought them, and they got a years worth of use free. Actually, if you delete it, then reinstall NAV2002 it will give you another year! So, they had a lot of freeloaders d/l-ing off them. I think 2004 changes the program around so you have to have a valid serial number (on the sleeve) or it turns off after a while.


21 posted on 05/13/2004 5:17:29 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Spacemonkey1023
"Go Zonealarm! Free and it kicks @!#!@!. "

"The Trojan shuts down all the windows whose titles contain any of the following strings: 
NAVAP 
black 
panda 
shield 
scan 
mcafee 
labs 
zone 
alarm 
agent 
avp 
msie 
mstask 
webcheck 
iomon 
nai_vs_stat
"

22 posted on 05/13/2004 5:57:12 PM PDT by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Well, I have perhaps a silly question, that maybe some others might learn from too. I thought a firewall was basic. As long as it stealthed all ports you were okay, plus it gave you the ability to control what you wanted to connect to the Net or not. (Norton every now and then has updates for ad blocking and site blocking, but I never used them because I have a lot more faith in Spybot and Spyware Blaster, BHO Demon, etc). So since I've used Norton this long as a basic firewall, I'm wondering what's new to be aware of? Uh, discounting this news, of course. :)


23 posted on 05/13/2004 6:01:51 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Never mind. Looks like hoot2 answered some of my question.
24 posted on 05/13/2004 6:03:24 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Another year? Dang! How'd they let that slip past?


25 posted on 05/13/2004 6:04:22 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

My friend's new computer at work has suddenly had that happen, too. PLEASE advise if anyone comes up w/the solution.


26 posted on 05/13/2004 6:16:50 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Have y'all tried the new Bloggers & Personal section?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

bookmark


27 posted on 05/13/2004 6:17:38 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
HAHAHAHAHA!

Sorry, folks. I just think it's funny. I don't really care for Symantech products, myself. It might work fine for most, but I always found them to be a pain in the a$$.

I rely on firewalls, hardware and software. So far, I'm bug-free.

28 posted on 05/13/2004 6:19:52 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The English word "Left" is translated into Latin as "Sinister". Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
Here's the link to the info at eEye Digital Security.

Symantec Advisories

29 posted on 05/13/2004 6:27:47 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

First thing to do when you buy a OEM computer like an HP, DELL, Gateway, etc..

Format C: /Q

Install a CLEAN copy of Windows XP.

Enjoy.

All that crap they put in there makes their systems unstable. Bootlegged software? What's that? ;)


30 posted on 05/13/2004 6:42:04 PM PDT by TSgt (What have you done for your country today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

One thing ZoneAlarm does very well is prevent any internal program from getting access to the internet without permission. If an executable changes in any way, it is not allowed access to the internet until you give it renewed permission. That is not quite as important as preventing stuff from coming in, but it can prevent certain worms and viruses from taking over your computer and sending stuff out. For instance, sending out your passwords or your credit card information.


31 posted on 05/13/2004 6:43:20 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

Get zone alarm at http://www.zonealarm.com

I think it's still free but I paid for the pro version it rocks.


32 posted on 05/13/2004 6:45:19 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The changed executable makes total sense. Thanks.


33 posted on 05/13/2004 6:57:15 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

No offense, Mike, but the direction MS is headed with "you bought it, but it's still ours" I don't like. And for a man like me who likes to burn CD's I especially remember that for a long long time people were having fits with finding XP drivers for their burners, etc, though I know a lot of the dust has settled since. First impressions, and all that.

And from the rumors of Longhorn, Big Brother wants to tighten it's grip even further.

Actually, ME ain't so bad as long as I dump McAfee, MusicMatch, Backweb, turn off auto-updating, don't install IE6sp1....

Almost forgot - speaking of updating, if any of you have heard about MS giving out free "security" discs, do not simply accept what's on it. For example, if you're using '98 and are doing just fine with IE5 and OE5 and Media Player 6.4, the damn thing will dump IE6sp1 and OE6 and the bug ridden Media Player 9 and Directx 9, whether you want it or not, and there's absolutely no way to uninstall the WMP or the DirectX without risky "aftermarket" assistance. The disc gives you NO options. They speak of security yet force you into needless "upgrades" which many of us know can be risky. And they throw it all on you at once.


34 posted on 05/13/2004 7:10:09 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Is ZoneAlarm going by the "EZTrust" name now? MS is sending out free samples of their AV and firewall with the "security" discs I just mentioned. (It has "free trial for a year" stamped on the disc, though I haven't tried it).


35 posted on 05/13/2004 7:12:48 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
I've been using Symantec products since the 1980s when Peter Norton's picture was on the box, except for one year with McAfee (came with a new computer), after which I swore I'd never use anything but Norton again.

HOWEVER, this year I upgraded to Internet Security 2004, and I believe even McAfee would be preferable. 4 times now I've gotten error messages saying the program "has been tampered" and recommending I uninstall and reinstall - which I've done, and doing it the way they recommend takes the best part of an evening.

The technical support stinks. Unless you want to pay for the privilege, you can only contact them by email, and their answers aren't necessarily prompt or helpful. The Anti-Spam works okay after it has been "trained", but it has its own set of idiosyncracies, including regularly crashing Outlook Express. (Yes, I know OE isn't the world's greatest product, but I have my own set of idiosyncracies and I'm used to it...)

First Symantec product I've ever had that I not only would not recommend, but would advise against wholeheartedly.

36 posted on 05/13/2004 7:16:50 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

I've built at least 4 systems over the past year and have reloaded many others with Windows XP and have not had any problems. There are the occasional hard to find drivers but I blame the hardware manufacturer for not supplying good drivers.

It all boils down to person preference.

I do agree that Microsoft is getting very big-brother-ish.

I'm not a paranoid, black helicopter type but I have to think that there must be some kind of back door into the operating system built for either Microsoft or the NSA.

The only secure computer is one that is turned off and physically inaccessible.


37 posted on 05/13/2004 7:21:49 PM PDT by TSgt (What have you done for your country today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

I'm like you when it comes to OE. I've gotten used to it, and for the most part it's logically laid out, and for me rock stable.

I like to try new things, and have been fooling with Mozilla the last couple of weeks. Their browser, (Firefox 0.8), though still considered a beta, is pretty darn good, after a little settling in. But their e-mail program, called Thunderbird.... it ain't ready for prime time. I'm sticking with OE.

I'd heard a lot about Norton's sorry level of support over the years. But for me, it's HP who ranks the lowest.

Almost from the beginning of my computing experience I found VDr (and CyberTech) and have learned to do most things on my own. I think a lot of us help each other a heck of a lot better than "support".


38 posted on 05/13/2004 7:37:30 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
I'll admit I've been intrigued with XP from the get-go. They say it's very stable. But the Big Brother aspects instantly turned me away. I hate to think what I'll be up against in another 10 years, the way they're headed. I'm not a Gates basher, but I understand the Linux camp more each day.

I imagine that people had troubles upgrading drivers, et al, when ME came out. I came in at the tail end, apparently.

I try not to be a paranoid type either. But when I think of XP and Longhorn and the rumors of DRM and the new MP3 with Dolby 5.1 and Norton, never mind what the RIAA and MPAA is doing.... when you hear those who say MS and McAfee and Norton is really behind all the attacks, how can you argue with a straight face? sigh

39 posted on 05/13/2004 7:46:07 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Find a surefire way to catch buffer overruns in code, and you will have found the programmer's Holy Grail.

They've had that for years now - it's called Ada95 - but for some reason, strongly-typed languages offend programmers' sense of themselves as Wild-West gunslingers...

40 posted on 05/13/2004 7:49:52 PM PDT by general_re (Drive offensively - the life you save may be your own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson