Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coming Soon to an Election Near You, Democratic Vote Fraud! They Did it Last Time and Here's How
05/13/04 | Emassung from AOL

Posted on 05/13/2004 8:05:26 PM PDT by MikeA

In 2000 vote fraud was so massive and blatant it nearly affected the choice of president. We nearly had a repeat of 1960...a president elected by the will of vote fraud.

Al Gore, Jr. received a minimum of 3.5 million votes from illegal aliens, felons, non residents and the dead. If that doesn't make your blood boil, President Bush also lost an estimated 2 million nationwide legal votes when the media "accidentally" called Florida and essentially the election very early for Gore, Jr. More than 5,000 ineligible felons , 2,000 dead people and countless illegal aliens voted in Florida. Strangely, the "unbiased" media was only concerned about hanging chads. In other words, the election wasn't close.

If Gore, Jr. won the "legal" popular vote, slick Will is a choirboy, Mrs. Clinton hates pantsuits and Michael Moore is a freedom loving, gun toting, anorexic conservative.

Let's look at the states that were stolen from President Bush omitting those states nearly stolen but he won anyway:

In New Mexico approximately 68,000 early and absentee ballots were deleted by a computer "glitch". One must assume that this isn't as important to the "unbiased" mainstream media as hanging chads in Florida (which by the way are easily caused when you jam more than one ballot into a voting machine). Also in New Mexico ballot boxes in Republic districts were "missing!". President Bush also lost thousands more votes in New Mexico when the media "accidentally" called Florida (and essentially the election) very early for Gore, Jr. thereby causing many Republican voters in Florida's panhandle and New Mexico to stay home.

Oregon had approximately 36,000 ballots with bogus signatures. Gore operatives posed as campaign workers at a Bush rally and destroyed thousands of ballots.

Wisconsin's Marquette University students took more than ten ballots at a time. Some 174 students said they voted more than once. The "Smokes for Votes" campaign saw Gore, Jr. workers passing out free packs of cigarettes to people at homeless shelters in exchange for votes for Gore, Jr. Apparently some libs don't mind smoking when it helps Gore, Jr. steal Wisconsin. Democratic precincts stayed open past closing time. Poll workers told voters "vote Democrat". Let's be fair, one needs to give the dead ample time to get to the polls. Remember, President Bush lost thousands of legal votes when the media "accidentally" called Florida and essentially the election very early for Gore, Jr.

Pennsylvania was also a disgrace. Philadelphia, a city of 1.3 million, has over one million registered voters. This means there are almost no children and the adults are civic minded. Turnout in some precincts was an unbelievable 100% with an equally unbelievable 99% for Gore, Jr. Ward 28 took the cake with 5,320 votes for gore, Jr., 75 for Bush. 99.9% of the vote went for Gore, Jr. My goodness, it seems the media overlooked the outright vote fraud. This is what happens when voting roles aren't purged and the liberal media looks the other way. The dead and nonresidents "residents that have moved" end up voting.

Michigan had vote fraud in Detroit that was so blatant and massive, GW never stood a chance of winning Michigan.

To detail all of the fraud would require more space than we could possibly allow in this shortened expose.

The Democrat vote fraud didn't stop there:

...150,000 voting ID's were mailed to legal aliens ineligible to vote in California ...over 200,000 overseas military personnel never received ballots ...it is estimated between two and four million illegal aliens voted =- 80% Democrat ...heavily Democrat precincts in Texas and Detroit had over 100% turnout ...Democrat precincts were open late in St. Louis and Bergen County, NJ

Slick Willy, Mrs. Clinton, Alan Colmes, Paul "the Forehead" Begala, Terry McAwful, Howard Fineman and Clinton News Network can all relax from their frenzied campaign. Gore, Jr. lost the popular vote by at least 3 million.

In a way it is not hard to feel sorry for Gore, Jr. He received massive nationwide vote fraud . President Bush lost a couple million more votes when media prematurely called the election very early for Gore, Jr. and the brilliant divinity school flunk out still managed to lose the election.

Vote fraud is a felony in most places. Odd that no one is in jail for vote fraud and Gore, Jr. gets to keep his millions of fraud votes. Maybe it's time to demand that the blatant vote fraud in the 2000 election be removed from the "official;" totals. Will John F. Kerry become the second JFK elected president by vote fraud? Stay tuned.

Vote fraud is a national disgrace. It should disgust anyone no matter what the party affiliation is. Let's all hope that the '04 election is an honest one.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: MikeA
Oregon had approximately 36,000 ballots with bogus signatures. Gore operatives posed as campaign workers at a Bush rally and destroyed thousands of ballots.

Can someone interpret this in english. How do you destroy ballots at a campaign rally?

21 posted on 05/13/2004 9:32:58 PM PDT by breakem ((formerly bigsigh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Good rant!

Remember - - it is not only welfare parasites, athiests, abortion enthusiasts, condom throwers, screeching feminists, and lazy socialist malcontents who elect Democrats. There are also many otherwise normal Americans who work and pay taxes, yet vote Democrat, most likely out of sheer stupidity. But not THAT many.

As the famous blue-red, county-by-county post-election map graphically demonstrated, Democrat votes anre heavily concentrated int he nation's parasite nests (cities) while Republicans control the great expanses of traditional America. Since the Democrats have the bulk of their base concentrated in the corrupt parasite nests, vote fraud is considerably easier to get away with. And the Democrats surely understand that without significant vote fraud, they do not stand a chance in mosttewide and national elections.

Sure as the sun come up, the scumbag Democrats will be at it again.


22 posted on 05/13/2004 9:38:47 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It almost went well beyond fraud and into death and destruction.

From David Frums Diary, NOV. 19, 2002: GORE SPEAKS, based upon an ABC interview. The words are by Karenna Gore.

He said, "We have to do what's best for the country, and it is not good for the country to have this kind of divisiveness. And he was on the phone, really calling off the dogs. There were people who wanted to fan the ... the flames of the racial issue and have real unrest. And he was on the phone asking them not to, because of what was best for the country not because of what was best for him politically. And that's really who he is. [end excerpt]

I wondered where were the race riots. The left knew that the media would go after Bush to stop the violence and answer the "will of the people." Gore would be the President.

I suspect that this election 2004 there will be no Democrats "calling off the dogs." IMO this could easily be a violent election.

23 posted on 05/13/2004 10:01:46 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Benedict Arnold was a hero for both sides in the same war, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zip; BOBWADE

ping


24 posted on 05/13/2004 10:04:36 PM PDT by Mrs Zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

This stuff is ON GOING

Here is a 2 hour old article from FOX NEWS



Voting ID Requirements Raise Concerns


Friday, May 14, 2004

PHOENIX — To buy a beer, rent a movie or board a plane, identification must be shown. But for voting, most states don't bother requiring Americans to flash ID.


In the last presidential election (search), just 11 states required identification to vote, while four states made it optional. In 36 states, all a voter had to do was sign a page or say his or her name.

In the wake of the 2000 election, lawmakers in 25 states introduced legislation tightening ID procedures. But in most cases, reform efforts failed because of partisan politics.

Democrats argue that verification requirements disenfranchise immigrants and those unlikely to carry an ID, like the homeless. Republicans argue that a photo ID is the best way to reduce fraud.

"One of the dirty little secrets about voter ID: It is truly intended to keep minorities and poor people from going to the polls," said Arizona Democratic state Rep. Steve Gallardo (search).

A bill in Arizona to require ID to be shown is expected to pass, but the state's Democratic governor has already threatened a veto. Similar bills in Kansas and Iowa were already vetoed by Democratic governors.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119891,00.html


25 posted on 05/13/2004 10:11:46 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

"Democrat votes and are heavily concentrated in the nation's parasite nests (cities) while Republicans control the great expanses of traditional America."

Exactly why the Democrats want to do away with the Electoral College. They want to win the elections in these densely controlled areas.


26 posted on 05/13/2004 10:26:39 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: breakem
How do you destroy ballots at a campaign rally?

I'll tell you if you tell me what this means:

05/13/04 | Emassung from AOL

27 posted on 05/13/2004 10:32:27 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

I don't doubt for a minute that democrats are crooks and vote thieves but you are tossing around a lot of numbers without providing sources.


28 posted on 05/13/2004 10:34:43 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
A good election system should provide a means by which one can ensure statistically that there's a 99.9% correlation between paper ballots cast and ballots recorded (with the ability to refine it to 99.99% in really close elections).

To date, none I've seen provide a means of ensuring a one-to-one correlation between the paper ballots and the recorded votes. I wonder why?

29 posted on 05/13/2004 10:49:28 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

"In the last presidential election (search), just 11 states required identification to vote, while four states made it optional. In 36 states, all a voter had to do was sign a page or say his or her name."

I wonder which 11 states required ID? Still, I don't think illegals could vote unless they were able to register to vote. In some states, like California, you have to be registered a certain amount of days before you are eligible to vote.


30 posted on 05/13/2004 11:17:58 PM PDT by Susannah (Have you thanked a soldier lately for your freedom?- www.amillionthanks.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Volunteer to become a poll watcher!

Much harder to carry out fraud when there are witnesses from the other party present.


31 posted on 05/14/2004 12:31:25 AM PDT by Richard-SIA (Nuke the U.N!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

huh?


32 posted on 05/14/2004 9:16:47 AM PDT by breakem ((formerly bigsigh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
...150,000 voting ID's were mailed to legal aliens ineligible to vote in California

What the heck is a 'voting ID?' In California, you tell them your name and address, they cross you off the list and have you sign a page and give you the ballot.

We're in the land of liberal insanity -- they'd remove the requirement for stating your name give a quarter of a chance.

Some items on the list ring true, others sound like Internet swag gleened from e-mails. In any event, careful watching of the polls, especially noting the RAT vans, is the key to preventing stolen elections.
33 posted on 05/14/2004 9:28:08 AM PDT by kingu (Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Here's another way the Democrats attempted to steal the election.
34 posted on 05/14/2004 9:34:41 AM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

This has been going on for decades. The Dems have been using the large metropolitan areas to manufacture the votes needed to win the state. Historically, the big cities are the last to report the results, waiting until they find out how many votes are needed. Voter fraud corrupts our democracy and thwarts the will of the people. The GOP needs to get serious on challenging these abuses. Observers should be used in all of our major cities to ensure that the fraud is at least not blatant. Philadephia, St. Louis, and Detroit were really a crime.


35 posted on 05/14/2004 9:40:21 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem

"Can someone interpret this in english. How do you destroy ballots at a campaign rally?"
.......................................
Oregon has gone to an entirely vote by mail system. You receive ballots in the mail and then return them by mail or at collection points. The ballots are collected over a period of weeks prior to the election deadline.

It is a sytem that has turned out to be the perfect vehicle for liberals needing to "pad" the votes for a candidate or an issue. For conservatives to win in Oregon, they must win big, because if the actual vote is even remotely close, the liberals in control of tabulating the ballots in the state's two biggest population centers can push it their way every time.


36 posted on 05/14/2004 9:44:49 AM PDT by Route66 (America's Mainstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Route66

....And to add to the part about that Bush campaign rally, there were people claiming to be officially collecting ballots there, who did not turn them in.


37 posted on 05/14/2004 9:46:58 AM PDT by Route66 (America's Mainstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper; MikeA
You really ought to post links to articles for some of these stories.

Agreed. Otherwise, the whole thing reads like every allegation and every number was pulled out of thin air.

38 posted on 05/14/2004 9:51:07 AM PDT by newgeezer (Count it all joy when you fall into various trials, ... the testing of your faith produces endurance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

I guess I'm very eager to believe all of it because I know the kind of people we are dealing with.


39 posted on 05/14/2004 9:52:33 AM PDT by biblewonk (No man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Route66

thanx.....and so, what happened at the rally? Where did the ballots come from?


40 posted on 05/14/2004 10:36:50 AM PDT by breakem ((formerly bigsigh))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson