Posted on 05/19/2004 1:41:45 AM PDT by kattracks
Terrible, isn't it? Bush's fault (as usual)
I know it was real irritating to hear right-wingers in denial. You know the lefties will dismiss all the evidence and logic, but more is expected from the right side...even libertarians. They could have tried the argument that Hussein was no danger even with wmds. But to insist that there were no wmds or Hussein never had them defied logic and reason. They in fact painted themselves in a corner. But you'll still hear them say "so what". By the way a man named Murray Weiss was on John Gibson today expounding on the Hussein-Al Qaeda connection. He said that in was utterly unfathomable to him how people with normal intelligence could deny it. Well he ought to listen to some of the people on this forum.
Two shells were found one with sarin and the other with mustard gas. But as I recall you people were insisting that there were absolutely no wmds left in Iraq. Didn't you consider the possibiity that if the terrorists EXPLODED!!! one bomb intending to kill our troops, they just might have access to others. You've tried all sorts of mental gymnastics to avoid concluding that maybe there are substantial amounts of wmds left in Iraq. Why can't you consider that maybe there are. Or is this some sort of ideological/anti-Bush block that you and others like you have that prevents you from concluding as much?
It used to bother me too.
But now, I couldn't care less. Or could I?
The proper use of sex vs. gender is something I take note of.
hehehe
BTTT and Bookmarked...
One of those, asked in the form of a one-word question, could be answered with "yes" or "no".
Now that we know what to look for, I think we'll see some large stockpiles of them surface.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.