Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2002 IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION (For Reference and Rebuttal)
YourCongress.com ^ | May 20, 2004

Posted on 05/19/2004 10:20:14 PM PDT by Howlin

IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION
 
107th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. J. RES. 114
October 10, 2002

JOINT RESOLUTION
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998), Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in `material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations' and urged the President `to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations';

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations; Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolution of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people; Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq; Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 (1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949 (1994);

Whereas in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1), Congress has authorized the President `to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolution 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677';

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and `constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,' and that Congress, `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688';

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to `work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge' posed by Iraq and to `work for the necessary resolutions,' while also making clear that `the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable'; Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002'.
SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS. The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to--
(1) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and
(2) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that--
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
(c) War Powers Resolution Requirements-
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS. (a) REPORTS- The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 3 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338).
(b) SINGLE CONSOLIDATED REPORT- To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93-148), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.
(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- To the extent that the information required by section 3 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of such resolution.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; declarationofwar; hjres114; iraqwar; resolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last
I posted this resoluation for two reasons:

One for reference.

And secondly to once and for all put in black and white the actual resolution that the members of Congress voted for, since apparently they are all now trying to mischaracterize the exact wording of the resolution that they claim they voted for at the time.

I am specifically referring to John Kerry and Fritz Hollings.

1 posted on 05/19/2004 10:20:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; Aeronaut; AFPhys; ...


2 posted on 05/19/2004 10:20:41 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Here are the votes:

http://epic-usa.org/toolbox/2002-senate-war-resolution-vote.pdf


3 posted on 05/19/2004 10:24:40 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

After his retirement will we learn that Cynthia McKinney is actually Hollings' daughter?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1138955/posts


4 posted on 05/19/2004 10:27:48 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

October 11, 2002

In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.

Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.

The measure passed the Senate and House by wider margins than the 1991 resolution that empowered the current president's father to go to war to expel Iraq from Kuwait. That measure passed 250-183 in the House and 52-47 in the Senate.


5 posted on 05/19/2004 10:27:50 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Reading that thread you linked is what made me go looking for this.

If he was misled, he's an idiot.


6 posted on 05/19/2004 10:28:27 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I just can't shed a tear watching a liar self-destruct.


7 posted on 05/19/2004 10:31:38 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Great reference material.Too bad the idiotic Dems don't know when to shut up.There IS a paper trail of their votes.So either they didn't read the thing and voted blindly,are incapable of understanding what they read,or are liars.None of those excuses help them.
8 posted on 05/19/2004 10:31:43 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Diddle E. Squat

I have had just about E-N-O-U-G-H.


9 posted on 05/19/2004 10:32:33 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

You haven't reached that piont yet? I have!


10 posted on 05/19/2004 10:36:50 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

LOL, I'm with you, except that the more they open their mouths the more they destroy themselves, IF we refute them. Which is why all of your research work, such as this thread, is invaluable and making a difference. Thanks for the diligence.


11 posted on 05/19/2004 10:37:09 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I vote for all of the above

Oh and not only is there a paper trial .. there is also their speeches

Their own words will come back to haunt them

12 posted on 05/19/2004 10:40:27 PM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I too vote for all of the above...which is why I listed what I did.:-)

We just have to cram their own bilious words down their throats.Fight them WITH their own damning words and votes.

13 posted on 05/19/2004 10:43:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I'm game :0)


14 posted on 05/19/2004 10:49:25 PM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

So am I! :-)


15 posted on 05/19/2004 10:50:31 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Howlin
I just can't shed a tear watching a liar self-destruct.

At some point I might, maybe when Kerry recites his concession speech on November 9th.

Tears of joy baby!

16 posted on 05/19/2004 10:54:28 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (John Kerry: An old creep, with gray hair, trying to look like he's 30 years old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Some Good Questions for Sen. Kerry on this Resolution


17 posted on 05/19/2004 10:54:36 PM PDT by The Bandit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

#1. In 1997, when Clinton signed the Iraqi Liberation Act, Kerry wanted boots on the ground to force regime change.

#2. In 1997, Kerry told Cokie Roberts and guests on Crossfire that regime change might have to happen without UN approval and certainly without the approval of France and Russia, I think it was, and he was okay with that. When questioned whether that meant a lack of leadership on Clinton's part, that he couldn't get UN approval, Kerry said "Not at all".

#3. Then Kerry voted to approve to go to war in Iraq after 9/11.

#4. Then Kerry started to say it was a mistake but now that we're there, we have to finish the job and it would be a disaster to leave.

#5. Now Kerry says if he's president he'd pull the troops.


18 posted on 05/19/2004 10:58:10 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Uh...did clinton have a joint res when he deployed the US army in Bosnia-Hergovenia 10 years ago or loaned our air force to the albanian muslims in 1999??


19 posted on 05/19/2004 10:58:46 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the ping, Howlin.

I remember at the time thinking that it was a brilliant bit of strategery on the President's part--forcing a vote BEFORE the elections of that year. That way the dims had to vote the way their constituents wanted them to, instead of grandstanding their partisanship for the cameras.


20 posted on 05/19/2004 11:08:51 PM PDT by Watery Tart (Thatís not my SUVÖ.thatís the Kerry Family Truckster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

They know the media will not hold them accountable. Not even FoxNews.


21 posted on 05/19/2004 11:46:43 PM PDT by malia (BUSH/CHENEY '04 NEVER FORGET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council

Every Democratic politician who says that Hussein was not a threat should have to explain why firing missiles at American pilots didn't count as repeated acts of war. If they respond that the Iraqis' firing of missiles at American pilots didn't count because they were such bad shots, then they should be forced to stand down range from a trigger-happy firing squad composed of Senator Byrd, Senator Hollings and Janet Reno.

22 posted on 05/19/2004 11:47:07 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimosabe31

"That would be no, Bob." (Stolen from a George Carlin routine.)


23 posted on 05/20/2004 12:15:09 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

BUMP


24 posted on 05/20/2004 6:48:28 AM PDT by kitkat (PLEASE STEAL THIS TAG: "The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

bump


25 posted on 05/20/2004 10:22:20 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks


26 posted on 05/20/2004 10:37:20 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Bumping to expose BOXER SHORTS LIES


27 posted on 01/23/2005 6:25:35 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Uh, could the raccoon living on Senator Barbara Boxer's head please print this text, gnaw a hole in her skull, and shove it in? Thanks!
28 posted on 01/23/2005 8:27:09 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; nicmarlo; A Citizen Reporter; Miss Marple; Mo1

Gosh, I had forgotten I even posted this.

She is FLAT OUT lying, isn't she?


29 posted on 01/23/2005 8:34:11 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mombonn; Peach; MEG33; prairiebreeze; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; gopwinsin04; WestVirginiaRebel; ...

Here is an old thread somebody found about the Senate vote; see if Boxer wasn't lying!

Here is the testimony from last week:


Condi: I refer you Sen. Boxer to president's speech before the war. He talks about the threat Saddam was, not just because of WMD, but because of his support for terrorists. He paid suicide bombers to bomb Israel. He used scuds against Israel. He attacked his neighbors before. We had gone to war against him in the past. It was the total picture, Senator.

Boxer: You should read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not. IT was WMD.


30 posted on 01/23/2005 8:50:09 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Here's another one from tonight:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1326989/posts


31 posted on 01/23/2005 8:55:59 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I had forgotten I posted this

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1138960/posts?page=12#12


32 posted on 01/23/2005 8:58:11 PM PST by Mo1 (Liberty will come to those who love it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
She is FLAT OUT lying, isn't she?

Yes...she is. And I knew some good FReeper would have evidence posted on FR. (I wasn't surprised it would be you, Howlin, lol).

33 posted on 01/23/2005 9:00:22 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; Mo1

Guess what...........I posted that LAST WEEK during the testimony!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1323020/posts?page=1161#1161

A good Freeper NEVER forgets or loses a bookmark they might need later!


34 posted on 01/23/2005 9:02:41 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Their own words will come back to haunt them

From your keyboard to God's ears.

35 posted on 01/23/2005 9:02:41 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I hate this witch; she's going to pay for this.


36 posted on 01/23/2005 9:03:23 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

good it's on that thread; and very good it's on this thread, by itself! Paper trails, paper trails, paper trails...it's one of the things that the Rats hate most.


37 posted on 01/23/2005 9:04:16 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Well, you should read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not, but most of my colleagues did. It was WMD, period. That was the reason and the causation for that, you know, particular vote.
-- Boxer Shorts Quote from her Excoriation of Condoleezza Rice, January 19, 2005

BOXER SHORTS IS A LIAR

Reasons for going to war, as stated in resolution:

1. Iraq's harboring of Al-Queda terrorists.
2. Iraq's support for International Terrorism.
3. Iraq's "brutal repression" of its citizens.
4. Iraq's failure to repatriate or give information
on non-Iraqi citizens detained and captured during
Gulf War I, including an American serviceman.
5. Failing to properly return property wrongfully
seized during the Kuwait invasion.
6. The attempted assassination of former
President Bush in 1993.
7. America's national security interests in
restoring peace and stability to the Persian Gulf.
8. WMD


38 posted on 01/23/2005 9:06:18 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement."

-- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002


39 posted on 01/23/2005 9:08:04 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Since we're referencing stuff, let's keep it all together:

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002


40 posted on 01/23/2005 9:09:24 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

lol....just posted that but didn't want to keep pinging you; now we have it doubly for posterity. : )


41 posted on 01/23/2005 9:12:24 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Well, you never know; we had to "prove" that we were first with the CBS memos when the bloggers blew us off.


42 posted on 01/23/2005 9:16:33 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Boxer Backed Clinton's Iraq War

* * *

In December 1998, however, after Clinton launched four days of air strikes on Iraq's suspected WMD targets, the California Democrat had a different reaction.

In quotes unearthed Tuesday afternoon by radio host Sean Hannity, Boxer claimed that Saddam had forced Clinton's hand.

"The president had no choice but to act today," she said in a statement issued by her office. "Anyone who questions the timing of his decision ignores the fact that we committed a month ago to act if [chief U.N. weapons inspector] Richard Butler reported that Saddam was not cooperating."

"These critics are blinded by political considerations," Boxer added.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/1/18/193341.shtml


43 posted on 01/23/2005 9:17:31 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
She is FLAT OUT lying, isn't she?

On several counts:

  1. This resolution only addressing WMD as a casus belli
  2. Percentage of war dead from California
  3. Several abuses of context (e.g., regarding aluminum tubes, considering the Department of Energy an "agency" when Condi referred to only one intelligence agency -- State -- as rejecting the predominant theory).
  4. Repeating the big lie of "no contact" between Iraq and Al Qaeda when multiple contacts (and more, only stopping short of documented operational coordination) have been cited in detail by the 911 Commission, The (unanimous) Senate Intelligence Committee, and other official and credible sources.

And I only caught bits and pieces of the exchanges and wasn't taking any notes. I'm sure there is more.

44 posted on 01/23/2005 9:17:43 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yes...and thereafter, the "pajamahadeen" was born....little did they realize that their pejorative term would later be embraced as a badge of honor! : )


45 posted on 01/23/2005 9:18:35 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

http://www.jonesforcalifornia.com/boxer/display_issue.cfm?ID=27

Boxer on Defense and National Security

Boxer 1991 Iraq Policy: Leave Kuwait at the mercy of Saddam - On the floor of the United States Senate in 1991, the same day she voted against removing Saddam from Kuwait by force of International coalition, Boxer suggested that the allies "hold the line at Saudi Arabia" with Kuwait being left to the mercy of Saddam Hussein.

Supported Clinton's Iraq policy, Voted for Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - In contrast to her radical and vocal opposition to the military policies of the two Bush Presidents, Boxer vigorously supported Bill Clinton in all phases of Clinton's Iraq policy, including military action, claiming that critics of Clinton's Iraq responses were "blinded by political considerations."


46 posted on 01/23/2005 9:22:37 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Boxer Busted on Iraq Lie During Condi Confirmation Hearings
47 posted on 01/23/2005 9:24:22 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Boxer Rebellion
January 20, 2005

* * *

Boxer forgets that regime change in Iraq had been official U.S. policy in Iraq since 1998, when President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act.

In 2003, Clinton phoned in to CNN's "Larry King Live" during a program honoring Bob Dole on his 80th birthday. In response to a question, he offered the following commentary on Iraq and WMD:

"Let me tell you what I know. When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in the inspection process, and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know."

We didn't know. U.N. Resolution 1441 demanded that WMD be accounted for or there would be "serious consequences."

That's why we went to war, and that's why the war was justified.


48 posted on 01/23/2005 9:35:42 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; Mo1
"Anyone who questions the timing of his decision ignores the fact that we committed a month ago to act if [chief U.N. weapons inspector] Richard Butler reported that Saddam was not cooperating." "These critics are blinded by political considerations," Boxer added.

Speaking of words coming back to haunt her!!! An excellent find!

49 posted on 01/23/2005 9:44:23 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

She lies every time she opens her mouth; her rightous indignation is ill-founded.


50 posted on 01/23/2005 9:45:32 PM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson