Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Legalize Incest' Suggestion Shocks Lawmakers
Crosswalk ^ | May 21st, 2004 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 05/21/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT by missyme

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Polybius
So, can we marry our brothers and our sisters at the same time.........as long as we are all consenting adults?

Certainly, the inimitable Justice Kennedy's "transcendent liberty" opinion is blanket coverage for whatever one may dream up.

21 posted on 05/21/2004 5:21:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: missyme

22 posted on 05/21/2004 5:30:41 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

The radical leftist agenda also include lowering the age of sexual consent. It's started and the agenda they led us to believe "it's all for the children" was really all for them. Sick perverts.


23 posted on 05/21/2004 5:40:51 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Rome slides away before our very, objecting eyes.


24 posted on 05/21/2004 5:42:38 PM PDT by bannie (Liberal Media: The Most Dangerous Enemies to America and Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I'm waiting for the gay community to support these oppressed "brothers and sisters". I guess the fact that that support would harm their personal agenda means they will acquiesce to the persecution of these people.

Gay activists and other leftists, stay out of the bedrooms of consenting adults!

25 posted on 05/21/2004 6:00:22 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21
That rarely brings out anything but bad.

You may, however, think of a couple of items which counter your argument:
1. Abraham and Sarah [founders of the Jewish race] were half brother and sister.
2. There were, apparently, a large number of brother-sister and father-daughter incestuous activities among the Egyptian pharoahs with little discernable adverse reaction.

Please don't take these points as an argument in favor of incest. I find the whole idea repulsive. But the potential genetic results of incest are usually extremely exagerated to a point of being, scientifically, ridiculous. [Just read some of the earlier replies in this post.]

26 posted on 05/21/2004 6:09:58 PM PDT by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Now that gay marriage is legal in the U.S., who are we to tell anybody else that what they do in private is immoral?


27 posted on 05/21/2004 6:11:51 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (The War on Terror is mere collateral damage to the Democrats' War on Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
>>"But it has also been found that if you continue to practice incest systematically, the recessive genes will automatically be weeded out, and only the dominant ones will come up."

Recessive like, say, 5 fingers per hand? Are you...sure?

28 posted on 05/21/2004 6:12:23 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

BWAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAA!!!

My diabolical plan is moving forward; right on schedule. First, it was gay marriage. Now it's incest. Next will be polygamy. After that, "group relationships" and "interspecies love". Finally, one day, I'll be able to proudly announce: "That's not an illegal assault weapon. That's my 23rd wife!"


29 posted on 05/21/2004 6:16:38 PM PDT by Redcloak (Have you hugged your tagline today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

If it feels good, do it. (/sarcasm)


30 posted on 05/21/2004 6:17:06 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand"P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

And the younger, the better...


31 posted on 05/21/2004 6:20:23 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21

Actually, biology doesn't support your argument; worse yet, the argument is flawed because it proceeds from the notion that evolution is a progressive path to an idealized perfection.


32 posted on 05/21/2004 6:23:03 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
There were, apparently, a large number of brother-sister and father-daughter incestuous activities among the Egyptian pharoahs with little discernable adverse reaction.

Easy for you to say, you weren't the 8 year old daughter with the Egyptian pervert hounding you every night.

33 posted on 05/21/2004 6:25:42 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
There is a factor that you have overlooked when you speak of the Pharaohs.
Many were found to have multiple physical disorders and defects that have direct connections to inbreeding and incest, and who's to say that much of their "god-like" behavior was brought about by genetically linked mental instability.
King Tut was found to have skeletal defects related to inbreeding, and his father, who's name escapes me, was also said to have been "misshapen".
These are extreme, involving multi-generational crossing and recrossing of the same narrow bloodlines.
I feel the same way you do about incest.. It's wrong, and I see no reason to let it start just because some "progressive" thinks it's OK.
34 posted on 05/21/2004 6:30:38 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Response times: My 12 gauge - 30 seconds / my .45 - 4 seconds/ Local police - ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Oh, PERFECT. That didn't take long, did it?

Hmmmmmmm. I wonder when it was that they first started letting women sit with the men in church. ;-)

35 posted on 05/21/2004 6:35:08 PM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Excuse me.
Unless I've been sadly mistaken (and misled) for the last few years...
Breeding sister to brother, whether its people or cattle or little fuzzy gerbils, is not a good idea over many generations.
My point was that incest (when practiced over multiple generations) can lead to some major problems in isolated populations.
The cheeta is a very good example of this in nature. Very narrow gene lines and slowly declining population.


36 posted on 05/21/2004 6:37:20 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Response times: My 12 gauge - 30 seconds / my .45 - 4 seconds/ Local police - ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21
King Tut was found to have skeletal defects related to inbreeding, and his father, who's name escapes me, was also said to have been "misshapen".

King Tut's daddy was [please excuse my spelling on this] Akhenaten - he's the guy that pushed monotheism in Egypt. He was hated by the priestly caste, and most references to him have been destroyed. There are some scholars who believe that the grossly distorted statues of him may have been due to a then-current artisitic fashion [Ancient Egyptian cubism?] rather than a gentic flaw[s].

37 posted on 05/21/2004 6:46:28 PM PDT by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
I've heard both arguments, but there are texts that survive from his reign that suggest he had "problems".. Well, it doesn't really matter that much, he's been gone for a while. (understatement)
..and at least you remembered his name, spelling doesn't matter that much, as long as we both know who we're talking about.
38 posted on 05/21/2004 6:51:41 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Response times: My 12 gauge - 30 seconds / my .45 - 4 seconds/ Local police - ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Oh NO, after Massachusettes we have anything goes when it comes to sexual relationships, I have heard Man with animals, sodomizing horses, marrying more than 1 person and now marry your family members, I am sure pedophiles will want in on the action next....

True, although in a roundabout way. Watch for movements to lower the age of consent. Pedophilia legalization will be a frog-boiling procedure--the heat will be turned up slowly by incrementally lowering the age of consent. You'll see arguments to lower the age to sixteen because "they do it anyway" and "if they're old enough to be given the responsibility to drive then they're old enough for sex". After that you'll see a move to lower the age to the beginning of puberty because "it's natural". They'll counter religious conservatives by arguing that "if God didn't want us to have sex at an early age then he wouldn't have equipped us so". Don't underestimate the ability of the human mind to rationalize deviant behavior.

39 posted on 05/21/2004 7:06:26 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Here we go. Another centimeter down the slide of moral and cultural collapse...


40 posted on 05/21/2004 8:21:09 PM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson