Posted on 05/23/2004 9:58:20 AM PDT by sathers
Iran Sends Diplomatic Warning to US Over Iraq
Iran said Sunday that it had sent a message of formal diplomatic warning to the United States about its actions in neighboring Iraq.
'We have warned the Americans about Iraq,' Foriegn Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi told a weekly news conference.
Asefi did not comment on the content of the warning, but officials and religious leaders in Shiite Muslim Iran have expressed outrage in recent weeks about the presence of US led forces in the holy Shiite cities of Najaf and Karbala.
Asefi said that the diplomatic message was sent VIA the Swiss Embassy in Tehran, which represents United States interests in Iran.
Washington broke ties with Iran in 1980.
(Excerpt) Read more at abs-cbnnews.com ...
Interpretation: You got us and we don't like it.
We could use another "train accident."
There probably PO'ed about the Predator drones over half of their country by now..
Don't we still owe the Mullahs a butt wipping?
'We have warned the Americans about Iraq,"
The regime loves sounding tough.....
Can you say, "Axis of Evil"??
Can you say 'we already control about half of Iran already!' (the parts bordering on Iraq, lol)
I don't understand why we're not shipping weapons to the Iranian dissidents. Iran should be in full rebellion today, but we have deliberately kept hands off. Time to turn up the heat under the ayatollahs in their own backyard.
Tough guys, reduced to sending out press releases VIA the Swiss.
Lets go with a kicking. Wipping sounds so Abu Grieb...
I am thinking that they don't like their new neighbors and how we plan to change the neighborhood!!
Right now they don't like it that we are crushing their bad boy Sadr while marginalizing their mole Chalabi.
Some people just can't wait in line for their ass whuppin, huh?
Iran wiull probably be partitioned with Russia occupying Tehran. It's long past time for Islam to depart Iran.
The mullahs in Iran and the Baathist/Socialists in Syria have to hate the fact that we now have them completely flanked.
I have stated many times that, strategically, the fact that we now have those two evil regimes flanked is of even more value than eliminating Hussein's brutal dictatorship in Iraq.
More people need to back up, get some perspective, and realize this.
Can you say 2650 degrees and cloudy ?
I thought the people were going to get rid of the mullahs themselves in Iran, still might happen that way..
ping
Ah, West Texas in August!
Oh wait, you said cloudy...
I have some kind of deeply-repressed, very upsetting memory about that.
Yes, but if the Arab rulers of Persia decide to liberate the tribal tourist attractions in Iraq, this could all come to a head sooner.
Anybody have any idea just how many "holy cities" these guys have. It's a tourist racket.
Wonder if they have golf packages like Myrtle Beach?
Great profile.
So sorry about your cousin and your friend.
Many of us will never forget.
Thanks for post ing this.
(this thread was up late last night, but too late for any comments)Below was what I wrote last night.
I was worried they are warning us that we are close to being attacked by chemical weapons or other WMD in Iraq.
Something seems off these past few days in Iraq; I have a bad feeling while others have a really good feeling. I can't put my finger on it but these withdraws seem like a set-up to me.
(not to worry, my "bad feelings" never pan out)
No.. wait... that's not right.. It's Eeek... *beg for mercy* *run away* *shiver with fright*
No, dangit, that's not it either... it's *run away* Eeeeek *shiver with... ahhh, screw it. Nuke 'em.
Translation: Muslims can fire on the U.S. from a holy site but the U.S. should not fire back on such a holy place.
Maybe they ought to declare war on the US--and then wait to see how long it takes for their own regime to collapse. Of course, it won't happen that way. They've been secretly (!) at war with us since the 70's.
Dear Iran, We will fire back whenever and wherever we are attacked.
Wait till Bush wins re-election?
...The world is filled with terrorists, and taking the fight to them is noble, but, we don't have the capability, right now. If the deadline for handing over the government to a sovereign Iraq is delayed, the US will be vulnerable to another terrorist attack...
Yes, like the Mullahs will pick up the garbage around the shrines to purify them. Burn those truly dessecrating scumbags alive.
Hey Meathead Mullahs, WE warned Iraq about Iraq last year, and look what happened to THEM!
"Can you say 2650 degrees and cloudy ?"
Tehran weather report: Clear with sudden mushroom clouds on the horizon :-)
Possibly because we're finally learning the lesson that today's freedom fighter is tomorrow's terrorist. We also thought it would be a good idea to help bin Laden and Saddam when they appeared to be promising pawns in the game. I am not sure if sending US weapons to Iran would be a wise idea. They probably have more individual arms and RPGs and whatever than they know what to do with now. It's not weapons that are lacking in Iran.
Besides, after the rebellion, Iran is not going to just forget its Shia mentality. I am not sure that democracy as we know it is possible in those countries...they have fought for so many centuries and been brainwashed for so many generations.
Like we would even know WHO to ship them to. Student groups and others disaffected are far from being capable of armed resistance. This cannot be transformed into an American fight and simplely trying to arm the unknown is not smart strategic thinking. The situation in Iran has to mature further before it is of any real use to us.
Tehran - Iran has sent a "formal warning" to the United States over American policy in neighbouring Iraq, foreign ministry spokesperson Hamid Reza Asefi said on Sunday, as he branded Washington immoral and deceitful.
The situation in Iraq is serious and this is why we have addressed the necessary warning," he told a press conference.
Shiite Muslim-dominated Iran has voiced alarm in recent days at fighting around the Shiite holy cities of Najaf and Karbala between US-led coalition forces and the militia of radical cleric Moqtada Sadr, for which it blames the United States.
It opposed the invasion of Iraq to topple Saddam Hussein's regime, with which it fought an eight-year war in the 1980s, and has called for the US-led coalition to withdraw rapidly and hand back power to the Iraqis.
Violent demonstrations have been staged recently outside the British embassy in Tehran against the actions of the United States and its main ally Britain in Iraq.
Washington has no diplomatic relations with Tehran and the warning - the first to be made public at least since the Iraq war began - was passed by diplomatic channels through the Swiss embassy here, which represents US interests in Iran.
"We want several things for Iraq, the most important of which are the departure of the occupation forces as quickly as possible and the restitution of authority to the Iraqi people themselves," Asefi said.
The United States accuses Iran of influencing Iraq's own Shiite majority to destabilise the country, and allowing foreign fighters to cross its borders into Iraq.
Asefi also insisted that the People's Mujahedeen, the main armed opposition organisation to the Islamic republic, be expelled from Iraq, where they have been held in a base under US guard.
"They should already have been expelled from Iraq, though they are still under American protection," Assefi said.
"What we see here is the hypocrisy and immoral approach of the Americans."
The People's Mujahedeen operated out of bases in Iraq under the protection of Saddam's regime, but were disarmed by US forces and some 4 000 of its members in Ashraf camp, 100km northeast of Baghdad, not far from the Iranian border.
Tehran has promised no harm to the ones who repent and return as long as they do not have "blood on their hands."
The provisional Iraqi authorities announced on December 9 their intention to expel the Mujahedeen from Iraq by the end of the year but this has not happened.
Asefi said the situation in Iraq had changed following "the torture of prisoners" by US troops and "attacks on the holy places."
Edited by Tisha Steyn
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1531289,00.html
|
Iran tells US to pull out of Iraq
|
||
The Iranian foreign ministry has sent a warning message to the US, criticising its policy in Iraq. A spokesman said Iran wanted "the departure of the occupation forces as quickly as possible and the restitution of authority to the Iraqi people". Iran, a Shia republic, is worried by fighting in holy cities such as Najaf and Karbala in neighbouring Iraq. Around 400 people also took part in a protest against the Iraq occupation outside the UK embassy in Tehran. Demonstrators chanted slogans demanding the closure of the UK embassy and expulsion of the British ambassador from Iran. About 100 of them repeatedly tried to rush the police lines but they were heavily outnumbered by the security forces, the BBC 's Jim Muir reports from Tehran. Some stones and firecrackers were thrown at the embassy compound, which has become a focal point for demonstrators angered by what they see as the violation of Shia holy places in Iraq. But there was more violence at a demonstration on Wednesday, when petrol bombs were thrown. Sympathy for militant Iran issued its warning through the Swiss embassy, as its diplomatic ties with the US have been severed. The foreign ministry said Iraq's Shia should take their lead from their senior religious leaders. Our correspondent says that while Iran has officially thrown its weight behind the moderate cleric, Ayatollah Ali Sistani, some hardline elements appear to have a good deal of sympathy for the younger and more militant Moqtada Sadr. Spying allegations denied In a separate development, Iran has denied that it received confidential information from Ahmed Chalabi, a senior member of the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council. However, Iran did acknowledge it had a "continuous and permanent dialogue" with Mr Chalabi, who faces allegations of passing US secrets to Tehran. Mr Chalabi was previously tipped for high office by senior figures in the Pentagon, but has fallen out of favour since reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction provided by his informants have proved to be unfounded. |
||
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3740027.stm
|
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=515936§ion=news
In short, the Coalition just beat the Iranian funded and organized Shiite insurrection. We took their best shot and are still standing.
This is big and positive news.
My spidey sense has been tingling, too. I feel like I'm watching a grand chess game, but the board is covered by a blanket and all I can see are the players' arms moving.
I did a big "Huh?!" over the Abu Graib incident, then got even more suspicious when Chalabi got busted, and now this.
Something big is going on behind the scenes but I can't make heads or tails of it. Imal--you got any ideas or insight?
Never bluff a man with the nuts.
I love your thought.......and would go to help you in a heartbeat....but then again...Hitlary Clinton feels she is so good of a Commander and Chief...may she goes to the Holy Site there in Iran and preach to the Mullahs.
Perhaps we should reply with a diplomatic message of our own, taped to the side of a MOAB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.