Posted on 05/24/2004 4:42:38 PM PDT by churchillbuff
"If it doesn't involve bloodshed in the middle east, you're not interested."
Subliminal mistake?
"Just where does he state that you claimed you were in a kamp?"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1141481/posts?page=163#163
Anymore questions?
Please try not to make them as superfluous as your last.
I know Michael Moore says the same thing? Are they two anti-war "kamps" out there that out number us?
You don't want to talk about it, so he did.
Why are you ashamed of being anti-war?
*snicker*...If you managed to finish this turgid, pretentious, ponderous piece of stale prosebread--much less be compelled by it-- I salute you.
"Euhhh. Thank goodness I've arrived."
I believe his friend Michael Moore wouldn't want him to reveal his affiliation...it might tarnish Moores gross image.
People like the author of this article?
"If it doesn't involve bloodshed in the middle east, you're not interested. But that doesn't make you a conservative, it just makes you some guy who is obsessed with the middle east."
Talking to himself third person again.
LOL
The person over-intellectualizing labels?
First off, asking which camp you're in pre-supposes you're in a camp to begin with (DUH!).
Secondly, I never claimed to be "anti-war".
I fully and still so our invasion of Afghanistan, but view the Iraq debacle as an unwinnable, expensive Neo-Con gamble.
If you must know, I am an anti-BIG GOV'T., anti-OPEN BORDERS, anti-OUTSOURCING, anti-TAX & SPEND. PRO-LIFE, anti-GAY MARRIAGE conservative.
Perhaps conservatives like me are now in the minority within the conservative movement as CWOJackson espouses.
Dumber than a box of rocks
Secondly, I never claimed to be "anti-war".
I fully and still so our invasion of Afghanistan, but view the Iraq debacle as an unwinnable, expensive Neo-Con gamble.
WHEN SAYING I'M AN ANTI-WAR DEFEATIST ISN'T ENOUGH.
Correction:
I fully and still support our invasion of Afghanistan...
Dumber than a box of rocks.
I think you're insulting the intelligence of rocks with that statement. ;-)
Yea, he is a serious troll.
A HALLMARK MOMENT
Secondly, I never claimed to be "anti-war".
I fully and still support our invasion of Afghanistan, but view the Iraq debacle as an unwinnable, expensive Neo-Con gamble.
WHEN SAYING I'M AN ANTI-WAR DEFEATIST ISN'T ENOUGH.
Duh! You are in a camp. To wit:
Secondly, I never claimed to be "anti-war".
I fully and still so our invasion of Afghanistan, but view the Iraq debacle as an unwinnable, expensive Neo-Con gamble.
As far as Iraq is concerned, you are anti-war, and thus in the anti-war camp.
Your pitiful rhetorical gymnastics aside, when the question is IRAQI FREEDOM, you are in the anti-war camp.
And really, this Kerryesque BS is laughable: "[a] I never claimed to be anti-war...[b but view IRAQI FREEDOM] as an unwinnable, expensive Neo-Con gamble."
That's like, "I'm not opposed to the war, but here's why I oppose it."
That throbbing headache you feel is called 'cognitive dissonance' Senator Kerry.
Keep working at it. You might actually be able to form a complete and meaningful sentence one day....but then again, with the crowd you hang around with, not likely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.