Posted on 05/24/2004 5:34:37 PM PDT by KQQL
Potheads for Kerry
What, you're skeptical of polls which show Bush losing everywhere except Iowa?
Perhaps Zogby will next release a poll showing Kerry losing in Washington DC, but winning in Wyoming?
Source?
Zogby also likes to put out completely nonsensical numbers for an entire campaign, and then say there was a "last minute surge" during the last two days of polling... and he then goes on in the media talking about this "dramatic shift"... like clockwork... and people still fall for it everytime.
There are some pollsters that I respect who seem to stay away from playing games: TIPP, SurveyUSA, Mason-Dixon, Field Poll (California pollster). SurveyUSA has probably been the most accurate pollster since 2002.
The 1976 parallel was suggested in an article about today's ABC/WPost poll.
Gerald Ford also had to contend with a serious primary challenge, and I believe that Reagan was only dozens of delegates away from toppling Ford. Nevertheless, Ford nearly pulled off an electoral college victory.
per reliabilty .
1) Mason Dixon
2) SurveyUSA
3) Research 2000
4) Local State pollsters
5) ARG
6) Rasmussen
7) Zogby
What defeatist claptrap. Bush is pulling even in major Blue states--Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvaia. He is making inroads in California--forcing Kerry to spend big bucks there. He is ahead in Florida. Stop the hand-wringing already. The only people who think Bush will lose are those who listen to beltway pundits--who tell themselves over and over and over and over that Bush is in trouble. --Then why isn't Kerry creaming him in the polls? If he's not ahead after all the Bush-bashing and bad news--he sure as hell won't be in the summer and fall.
Commonly accepted, but untrue in Presidential elections.
However,
we need to face the fact Kerry is going to win and the WOT will likely be lost.
I disagree, even though Kerry may win, just as you have it in your scenario. However, Kerry winning won't stop terrorism, and in order to establish his credibility Kerry will be in much the same position as JFK facing off against the Soviets and Cuba: he might 'go ballistic'. (Kennedy took us to the brink of nuclear war because he slept while Russia planted nukes in Cuba.)
My read on Kerry is not simply that he is far-left, but that he is mentally and politically unstable. That macho warrior in him fights with the guilt-ridden war criminal that voted against every important arms appropriation and intelligence funding for 30 years in the US Senate. The man who today says terrorism should be handled like a 'police action' is precisely the man who would respond to a second 911 with a nuclear barrage! -- All this in contrast to the patient, methodical Bush, who neither speeds up nor slows down according to the prevailing political sentiment. IOW, by downplaying the seriousness of the WOT, President Kerry may be pushed more easily to the brink of total war. And that is just what Jihadists all over the world want. They think that total chaos offers them better chances than the current US hegemony.
Well, I am certainly open to persuasion but I would merely note that if what you mean is that undecided voters in May do not necessarily end up breaking for the challenger in November then I certainly don't disagree. However, my original statement was an 'if the election were held today' statement. I haven't made any prediction whatsoever about what I think will happen in November if for no other reason than because I haven't decided yet.
Here is some evidence to back my assertion up. I'm using Gallup here, since they have available data going back over many elections. In each case, I am presenting the results from a month before the election, the results in the poll before the last one (their last one never has undecideds), and the election results.
| Year | Race | 1 Month Out | Next To Last Poll | Result | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1936 | Incumbent FDR vs. Landon | FDR 51, Landon 44 | FDR 54, Landon 43 | FDR 61, Landon 37 | Broke towards incumbent |
| 1940 | Incumbent FDR vs. Willkie | FDR 51, Willkie 42 | FDR 51, Willkie 42 | FDR 55, Willkie 45 | Broke evenly |
| 1944 | Incumbent FDR vs. Dewey | FDR 47, Dewey 45 | FDR 47, Dewey 45 | FDR 53, Dewey 46 | Broke towards incumbent |
| 1948 | No incumbent pres, incumbent VP Truman vs Dewey | Dewey 46, Truman 40 | Dewey 50, Truman 45 | Truman 50, Dewey 45 | Broke towards the incumbent VP |
| 1952 | No incumbents. Dems incumbent party. Ike vs. Stevenson | Ike 51, Stevenson 38 | Ike 48, Stevenson 39 | Ike 55, Stevenson 44 | Broke evenly |
| 1956 | Incumbent Ike vs Stevenson | Ike 51, Stevenson 41 | Ike 51, Stevenson 41 | Ike 57, Stevenson 42 | Broke towards incumbent |
| 1960 | No incumbent pres. Incumbent VP vs Kennedy | Kennedy 49, Nixon 45 | Kennedy 49, Nixon 45 | Kennedy 50, Nixon 50 | Broke for incumbent VP |
| 1964 | Incumbent LBJ vs. Goldwater | LBJ 64, Goldwater 29 | LBJ 64, Goldwater 29 | LBJ 61, Goldwater 38 | Broke towards challenger |
| 1968 | No incumbents. Dems incumbent party. Humphrey vs Nixon | Nixon 43, Humphrey 31 | Nixon 44, Humphrey 36 | Nixon 43, Humphrey 43 | Broke towards incumbent party |
| 1972 | Incumbent Nixon vs McGovern | Nixon 60, McGovern 34 | Nixon 59, McGovern 36 | Nixon 61, McGovern 38 | Broke evenly |
| 1976 | Incumbent Ford vs Carter | Carter 47, Ford 41 | Carter 48, Ford 44 | Carter 50, Ford 48 | Slight break towards incumbent |
| 1980 | Incumbent Carter vs Reagan | Carter 47, Reagan 39 | Carter 47, Reagan 39 | Reagan 51, Carter 41 | Broke strongly towards challenger. So did some of the decideds. |
| 1984 | Incumbent Reagan vs Mondale | Reagan 58, Mondale 38 | Reagan 56, Mondale 39 | Reagan 59, Mondale 41 | Broke evenly |
| 1988 | No incumbent pres. Incumbent VP Bush vs Dukakis | Bush 49, Dukakis 43 | Bush 53, Dukakis 39 | Bush 53, Dukakis 46 | Depends on which you use. Broke evenly from a month out. Broke slightly towards challenger from the 2nd to last. |
| 1992 | Incumbent Bush vs Clinton | Clinton 47, Bush 29 | Clinton 43, Bush 36 | Clinton 43, Bush 38 | Broke towards incumbent |
| 1996 | Incumbent Clinton vs Dole | Clinton 48, Dole 39 | Clinton 52, Dole 41 | Clinton 49, Dole 41 | Broke evenly |
| 2000 | No incumbent pres. Incumbent VP Gore vs Bush | Bush 48, Gore 43 | Bush 47, Gore 45 | Gore 48, Bush 48 | Broke towards incumbent VP |
Hey, that's really interesting! I'm gonna have to revise my approach now so I'm unsure how I would speculatively distribute the EVs except to say that I would assign Kerry notably less than I had previously. Almost certainly no more than 295, off the top of my head.
Thanks for posting that!
test
Hmm.. Something about this post made the formatting on My Comments page go hideously awry.. Oh well!
I can fix that.
If you take my chart and extend it to May, then the trend of undecideds breaking for the incumbent remains. Some examples:
May 1972: Nixon 53, McGovern 34. Result: Nixon 61, McGovern 37
May 1976: Carter 53, Ford 40. Result: Carter 50, Ford 48
May 1980: Carter 40, Reagan 32. Result: Reagan 51, Carter 41
May 1984: Reagan 50, Mondale 46. Result: Reagan 59, Mondale 41
May 1988: Dukakis 54, Bush 38. Result: Bush 53, Dukakis 46
May 1992: Bush 35, Challengers 60. Result: Bush 38, Challengers 62
May 1996: Clinton 47, Dole 32. Result: Clinton 49, Dole 41
May 2000: Bush 52, Gore 37. Result: Gore 48, Bush 48
Cool deal. Thanks!
One funny thing is that the Presidential election is rarely close this far out. But this year, I've the feeling we could skip the conventions and fast forward to November.
With the economy improving, and the Dems having overplayed every scandal in Iraq, the public's expectations toward Iraq have lowered. That means that anything reasonably resembling a working, representative government, and lack of total chaos in the streets will be seen as a victory for Bush!
Would you agree? ie., that when all the smoke clears, Bush is in the driver's seat?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.