Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/27/2004 6:32:15 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: backhoe; Howlin
Long read, but I think worth it.
2 posted on 05/27/2004 6:33:09 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Couldn't find this posted on FR.


3 posted on 05/27/2004 6:33:46 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; Luis Gonzalez; William Wallace
FYI
4 posted on 05/27/2004 6:34:19 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Fascinating stuff (all of it)--thank you for posting!


5 posted on 05/27/2004 6:35:26 AM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Hitler was a socialist. It can't be said ENOUGH!


6 posted on 05/27/2004 6:35:58 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Bump for later read.


8 posted on 05/27/2004 6:41:46 AM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Impossible. Hitler was a right wing nut case almost as bad as George W. Bush!

All the liberals say this so it must be true. They're all too dumb to realize that Nazi is an acronym for National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or National Socialist German Worker's Party.

9 posted on 05/27/2004 6:47:01 AM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Mother of God.

There are parts of this that will make Dr. Ray the 901st file.

Save this somewhere, before it goes down the Memory Hole.


10 posted on 05/27/2004 6:47:25 AM PDT by Old Sarge (It's not Bush's fault - It's THE MEDIA'S fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Yawn. Is there really anyone who doesn't know Hitler was a socialist? I mean what part of National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei (National Socialist German Workers Party) is unclear?

Without wasting a lot of time on the article, one thing stood out as wrongheaded: the discussion about Hitler and the Nazis being "middle class". There was no "middle class" in the American sense in Germany. Rather, there was (1) the aristocracy, (2) the bourgeoisie (non-noble rich, owners of significant businesses, etc., living primarily on undearned incomes), (3) the petit bourgeoisie or, to use the German term, Kleinbuerger, (4) the working class (the vast majority in urban areas, (5) peasants (farmers ranging from prosperous Frei Baueren with large farms to landless agricultural laborers, and (6) a relataively small lumpenpoletariat. The closest thing to what we would call "middle class" in this country would be the kleinbuerger (which would include most white collar workers and professionals) and the upper third of the working class (master and journeymen in trades, etc.).

11 posted on 05/27/2004 6:50:01 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Not if you read " The Three Faces of Fascism" (THE difinitive work on Nazism) by Ernst Nolte.
12 posted on 05/27/2004 6:55:13 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Dr. Ray is an amiable fellow. I e-mailed him some questions about fascism a few months ago and he responded to all by the next day. This fellow is one of the good guys.


14 posted on 05/27/2004 6:58:42 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

bttt


15 posted on 05/27/2004 6:58:59 AM PDT by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Well, I read through the first part of it, but it started to seem pointless. A few comments:

First, the title. "Hitler was a socialist". Well, duh; the name of his party was the National Socialist Party! This is a surprise, then, that he was a socialist?

Then there's this assertion:

Before we answer that question, however, let us look at what the Left and Right in politics consist of at present. Consider this description by Edward Feser of someone who would have been an ideal Presidential candidate for the modern-day U.S. Democratic party:

Followed by a description of Hitler. In reading through the 3 paragraphs that follow, it's easy to find individual characteristics that are applicable to many Democratic politicians. It's also quite possible to pick out characteristics that apply to some Republicans as well (for example, President Bush was not exactly the ideal family man up until about the age of 40). But it's quite impossible to apply the entire description to any Presidential candidate of any party, never mind their "ideal" candidate.

So we surely do need to look at the plausibility of the "insanity" claim. Do madmen achieve popular acclaim among their own people? Do madmen inspire their countrymen to epics of self-sacrifice? Do madmen leave a mark on history unlike any other? Until Hitler came along, the answers to all these questions would surely have been "no".

Uh, what? Here's a presumption that's challengable. The author himself makes the point of the difficulty of having to prove, or disprove, that a given historical figure was mad. So I can hardly accept that "the answers to all these questions would surely have been 'no'", because I would not be able to determine the mental status of any person in the past who had inspired their populace to such measures.

At that point I pretty much lost any confidence in the author, and stopped reading.

18 posted on 05/27/2004 6:59:45 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Amen. This can't be stressed enough. If you really seek to control other people, Socialism is the only mechanism. And it's always wrong.


19 posted on 05/27/2004 7:03:47 AM PDT by keithtoo (Please remove all Kerry-on luggage from your forehead compartments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

VERY good piece!

National socialism is the only practicable socialism.


20 posted on 05/27/2004 7:08:23 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Bump for later .... thanks


21 posted on 05/27/2004 7:10:06 AM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
BUMP for latter perusal.
23 posted on 05/27/2004 7:11:16 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Pátria, pero sin amo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican; OXENinFLA
WOW! 19 pages(including references) printed at 75% size!

Got to go fishing soon, will have to read later.

25 posted on 05/27/2004 7:15:37 AM PDT by StriperSniper (Welcome home Thomas Hamill !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Hayek has the high ground on this argument. It is well defended.


27 posted on 05/27/2004 7:21:56 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Bookmarked and Bumped


28 posted on 05/27/2004 7:25:54 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Pax et bonum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson