Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
"Newsmax? The Wall St. Journal? Who reads them? They'll never get on 'Today', so why should I care? Now gimme back the remote, "American Idol" is on..."
- the indigenous North American Sheep.
The WSJ article finishes with a criticism of the administration for not making a clear case to the public of the connection between Saddam and terrorism. Right next to that article is a large article, The Real Story of Fallujah, again ending with a criticism of the administration for not getting the truly important, positive stories out to the public and allowing the histrionics over the prison stories to obscure all the positive news.
Good post
It cannot be made more clear. On whom do we practice the greater perfidy? For it must be one side or the other, in the stark choices forced upon us. For the future of Israel, and peace of the Middle East, the anti-Jewish despots must be removed or incapacitated. The health of Israel reflects the health of all the Middle East. So long as these anti-Jewish (and anti-Western) despots remain in power, the Middle East remains inherently unstable, and New York City is at risk.
Hmmm
ping!
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/11/13/180930.shtml
Dave Eberhart, NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2001
"They are trained to jump all at one time, and make a declaration: ‘We are going to take over the plane! And nobody move, don't move, don't make any moves!’” a former Iraqi Army officer told PBS and the New York Times recently when describing a terrorist training camp near Baghdad.
"[T]here's a real whole 707 plane, a whole real plane, standing in the middle of the training area in this camp,” said Sabah Khodada, a former captain who defected from Saddam Hussein’s army after 10 years of service. The camp, said Khodada, was at a location called Salman Pak about 20 miles southeast of the Iraqi capital.
Nailing down the reason for war.
Pres. Bush ALWAYS said the war was against those who aided, abetted, harbored.....terrorism...particularly those terrorists involved in 9/11.
DEMS: NOTHING HERE ..
BTTT. Let Kerry make himself look like a fool, lock him into a losing positionm, then drop the bomb showing Kerry as dangerous and foolish.
Even the paper of record, the NYT, says so - so it can't be true that he would connive with NON-secularists.
Saddam was a secularist. Saddam was a secularist. Saddam was a secularist.
Unless he was on the plane, with a note attached, "I'm crashing this plane on behalf of Saddam"...
Even then the rats will accuse Bush of pinning the note to him.
bimp
Bookmarkilation!
NOW, this is what the President SHOULD be saying on TV! Right now. The evidence is overwhelming for at least a CASUAL link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda, and now this? It's time to go on the offensive Mr. President, big time.
So if the evidence is compelling, why did three different friendly governments including our very own CIA let him go?
"What you won't see on national news"....
Even if this pans out and becomes even more definitive, the critics will say, "Yeah, but Bush never claimed a Saddam-9/11 link as a justification for war, so the war is still immoral and unjustified." Of course, they will say this even though they've been saying all along that Bush falsely claimed a Saddam-9/11 link.