Well let's just set the WABAC machine to 5/21/04...
Me: You didn't raise a stink about Racak when Bo Pellnas referred to the 23 men as having been executed in the article you posted, so I didn't really have any reason to suspect you'd subscribe to the idiocy surrounding the subject.
You don't, do you?
You: I didn't "raise a stink" as you so eloquently put it in the Bo Pellnäs thread as it was not relevent to the conversation. I have never denied that Albanians were killed in Racak in any of my posts either.
So, just so I understand you completely here, Jane, what you're saying now is that you weren't agreeing with Bo's assertions concerning the massacre at Racak, but were instead, through some acrobatic gyration known only to you, maintaining that nobody was massacred at Racak while only implying that you were of the opposite viewpoint, and that you do subscribe to the idiocy surrounding the subject.
there is a difference between 23 killed/executed and 350,000 being "expelled".
I guess "/executed" is Australian or Swedish for "but not executed"?
Don't you just hate it that your previous statements are still available? It's kind of like Balkans history - you can misrepresent it all you want, as many are wont to do, but the lies never hold up under close scrutiny, which leaves the parties propagating those lies with a tough choice between coming clean or producing more lies - kind of makes your posts just a small example of the overall Balkans discussion here on FR.
The EU Forensic team study of Racak has never been released, which is suggestive of its conclusions, as the EU was hardly a neutral and "independent" body.
A copy of the EU Forensics Team's report on Racak, by the way, was delivered to the district court in Pristina on March 17th of 1999 - if it has been suppressed, it is with the complicity of Slobodan Milosevic.
Congratulations Jane, you're now a fully fledged member of FR's Serbian wolfpack.
You are almost amusing....as I said in my reply to you as per post #104 which was a reply to your question: "And why did you, not a week ago, confirm that you were of the opinion that a massacre had taken place at Racak only to post this trash this week?"
I was not, a week ago or at any other time, of the opinion that a massacre had happened in Racak. I agreed that something awful had happened there yes, as anytime civilians get killed when caught up in cross fire between two rival groups is awful. But it does not mean I agree that Racak was a massacre.
Compared to the post on the thread by Bo Pellnäs: I have never denied that Albanians were killed in Racak in any of my posts either.
Not denying that Albanians were killed is not the same as being of the opinion that Racak was a massacre. Where you got that from I have no idea.
"Don't you just hate it that your previous statements are still available?" Yes I absolutely do, as they show that your accusations are false and a misrepresentation of my words. So Thank you!
"Congratulations Jane, you're now a fully fledged member of FR's Serbian wolfpack." Cute :)