Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScottFromSpokane

But wouldn't the "10 years total" thing, found in the 22nd Amendment, make him ineligible?


38 posted on 06/04/2004 1:18:23 PM PDT by admiralsn (Thank you all WW2 veterans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: admiralsn
Here is the entire 22nd Amendment. There is no ten-year limit.
Amendment XXII

Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.

As I said before, the supposed "ten-year limit" comes from the possibility of filling two years of an unexpired term, plus two elected terms. But whoever came up with that idea didn't consider the possibility of a former President succeeding to the office.
44 posted on 06/04/2004 1:23:09 PM PDT by ScottFromSpokane (Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson