Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh's Tribute to Ronald Reagan
Rush Limbaugh ^ | June 7 2004 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/07/2004 3:20:48 PM PDT by xp38

RUSH: You know, they say, ladies and gentlemen, that when someone who has lived just a wonderful life, a full life in every way, that sadness upon that person's death is inappropriate, that it's not necessary. Yet, I have to tell you, I'm sad today. Some of you have written over the weekend and speculated as to what was -- not "wrong" with me -- but why I was sort of subdued on Friday. I had received information on Friday that this was coming, and this has affected me in ways that I did not expect. President Reagan has basically been out of the public eye for at least ten years, and everyone knew this day was coming, Saturday's day was coming, but nevertheless, since Saturday afternoon at four o'clock Eastern time, I have felt like a part of me died as well. But I know that Ronald Reagan lives on in my heart, as he will live on in all of your hearts as well.

I never met Reagan, but it wasn't necessary to have met him in order to love him, which I do, and that's as great a measure of greatness as I know. People say -- I've said it, I reminded you of it many times here -- it's said that greatness doesn't need to be explained, and that's true for those people who are paying attention at the time. But sadly, most people's historical perspective traces back only to the day they were born. If you couple that fact with the realization that history education in this country, in the public school system, is woefully inept, and by that I mean that I have heard from people over the weekend whose 17- and 18-year-old kids have no idea who Ronald Reagan is. They know all about the Vietnam War and they know all about some of the horrible history involving America since, but they don't know anything about Reagan. They've not been taught much about Reagan at all.

This is a huge eye opener for them. They are asking their parents, "Why is everybody going nuts over this guy?" Millions of Americans also under the age of 30 have no concrete memory of Ronald Reagan's presidency, and yet we are all, including them, touched by his greatness. I'd like to take a moment here to explain to those of you who have no direct relationship with Ronald Reagan, you weren't old enough or even born during his presidency to have understood it or to have known how you have been affected by it, because the simple fact is that now in death, Ronald Reagan once again defines the utter beauty and blessing that is America and reminds us all of our destiny. You know, Reagan's greatness is not all about a single speech or a single phrase in a speech or a single memory. Ronald Reagan was great because he was a man. He was a great man, and he knew who he was. He was comfortable in his skin. He was optimistic and happy. He was infectious. He dared to embrace big ideas. He dared to do big things to overcome huge obstacles in the midst of all kinds of experts telling him it couldn't be done, in the midst of all kinds of criticism, in the midst of all kinds of personal insults. I must tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I have been in awe this weekend watching some of the coverage, listening to some of the people who I remember explicitly insulting this man every bit as much as they insult George W. Bush today, now singing his praises, and I look interestingly and curiously at the TV set when I see this, and I said, "Well, which is it, then? Was he great? If he was great, he was great then." I've seen some of the most incredible testaments to his policies, and I've seen the usual digs. I mean, it's all out there, but you expect the digs in this current climate, and they're there.

But the idea that people who routinely did everything they could to diminish Ronald Reagan in the eyes of a nation who loved him, now the fact that they do not dare come forth and be honest at this point in time about their true beliefs and feelings of Ronald Reagan, is another testament to his greatness. They don't dare, because they know the love this country has for Ronald Reagan. They know it would be suicide to practice their politics as usual during this period. Ronald Reagan was great because he never gave up on his country, and the reason he never gave up on his country, ladies and gentlemen, is because he never doubted for a moment any of us. Never doubted our wisdom. He never doubted our judgment. He never doubted our ability to do the right thing. He never doubted our ability to rise to necessary challenges. Ronald Reagan never doubted the people of this country at all. That made him a huge threat, because Reagan's enemies had no threat, no confidence and no faith in the American people. They still don't. Their view of the American people is one of incompetence, lack of judgment, inability, basic averageness -- and, of course, they must think that, for if they don't, there's no reason for them.

You know, some people forget that in the late 70s and the early 80s, the Washington establishment, which is what Reagan would later call, "The iron triangle of the liberal media, liberal special interest groups and the massive bureaucracy." Some forget that in the late seventies and early eighties the Washington establish want was talking about of America's inevitable decline. Jimmy Carter's presidency was looked at by the American left, "Well, gee, if our best and brightest can't make anything out of this, maybe there's something wrong with this." Never thought there was anything wrong with them, never thought there was anything wrong with their ideas, never thought there was anything wrong with their president, and so rather than question their own role in bringing the nation to the point it was in in 1979 and '80 -- the worst economy since the Great Depression, Soviet Union on the march throughout the world -- the elites of liberalism questioned the fortitude of the American people.

Yes, my friends. It was, after all, the establishment's failed policies and worldview that had led the nation into economic and international decline. It wasn't the people, and Reagan knew it. Jimmy Carter. After Jimmy Carter, the establishment, the elites, were questioning whether the presidency itself -- I wonder how many people remember this. The late 70s, early 80s, the Washington and New York elites were themselves questioning whether the presidency itself could survive as then structured, whether it was "a job too big for any one man." Do you remember this? Some people wondered whether the Constitution should be changed to provide for a single six-year term, rather than requiring a president to run for reelection. Along came Ronald Reagan, and there's no doom and gloom in Ronald Reagan. He's the optimist, eternally so, shining city on a hill. He would have none of this doom and gloom. He rejected Washington elitism, and he had since 1964 and before. Talk about core values, talk about sticking to them. He rejected Washington elitism and connected directly with the American people who adored him. He didn't need the press. He didn't need the press to spin what he was or what he said. He had the ability to connect individually with each American who saw him. That is an incredible -- I don't even want to say "talent." It's a characteristic that so few Americans have, so few people have, but he was able to do it. He brought confidence; he brought vigor, and he brought humility to the presidency, which had been missing for years, and this profoundly upset his political and media adversaries to no end, and Reagan enjoyed that. Ronald Reagan rejected socialism; he rejected big government. He insisted on returning as much government back to the people as was possible. He cut taxes so deeply that even some on his own staff became disbelievers and wrote books about it. They were wrong. He was right. Our lives today are a testament to how right Ronald Reagan was.

Reagan created the greatest economic expansion in American history, and certainly since World War II. He wasn't always successful in cutting government programs, but he tried. He slowed the growth of domestic spending by vetoing spending bills and by shutting down the federal bureaucracy. But in the end, you know, in our constitutional system, it's Congress that controls the purse strings and they made deals with him they didn't keep, but he tried. In fact, Ronald Reagan proved something that to this day economists, elite economists do not believe. Ronald Reagan lowered inflation during the midst of one of the most unbridled economies and its growth period in history. No economist thought that possible, but he did. He brought inflation down to 4.8% from its double-digit figure when he took office, and significantly, unlike Franklin Roosevelt, Roosevelt -- this is key -- Roosevelt turned to government in a failed effort to revive the American economy.

The New Deal did not revive the American economy; World War II did. The New Deal just revived government. Ronald Reagan, instead of turning to government to revive a failed American economy turned to us, the American people. He worked to unleash our ingenuity, our entrepreneurism, our enterprise and productivity. You've heard it said all weekend that Reagan "made people feel good about themselves." That's true. He made people feel good about the military. That's true he made people feel good about their country. Yeah, did all of that, no mean feat, and for those of you who weren't around or paying attention in 1979 and 1980 throughout -- actually 1984 -- huge recession in '81 and '82. For those of you who weren't around, you have no idea. Nothing since has happened quite like it. Those of you who came of age during the campaign of 1992, when you listen to Bill and Hillary Clinton talk about the 80s as "the worst economy in the last 50 years," it was a lie. The American people were sympathetic to it because there was a small little recession occurring in 1990 and '91, into the '92 campaign, but it was nothing compared to what Ronald Reagan inherited and how Ronald Reagan fixed it.

This has been a staple of this program since its inception in 1988, actually, '84 in Sacramento, my adopted hometown, and that is that you are the ones who make this country great. You are the ones who make this country happen. You are the ones who create this economy. You are the people who determine the destiny of this country, not our leaders. Our leaders, if they're good, get us to do things that may be tough, maybe things we don't want to do at the time, maybe endure things we would rather not, but leaders get obstacles out of our way, leaders do show us the way, and I'm not trying to diminish Reagan with this. I'm trying to celebrate Reagan. Reagan knew because of his unbridled love for the American people, coupled with our God-given freedom, our natural yearning to be free. Reagan knew that all he had to do was unleash that, and it was "Katie, bar the doors," and he was right. He was right then; he is right today. He will be right for as long as there is America. Those who choose to follow his footsteps will also be right. Those who choose to follow in his footsteps will experience the optimism and the good cheer and the love of country that he always had. There are many who will carry on in his tradition. I'm honored to be one of them. I wouldn't be sitting here were it not for Ronald Reagan, and I never met him. You know, Ronald not only rejected socialism and big government, but he also rejected communism. He defeated it ultimately, and well, I'm getting to that point. So many elites, so many on the left in Reagan's era, said then what's being said today about militant Islam, and what Chamberlain said about Nazism. "Well, it's there. We can't do anything about it. We've just got to try to manage it, have to try to get along with it. We have to try to make sure that we don't destroy each other," and Reagan figuratively scratched his head and said, 'What's that? Get along with this? Look at what they're doing to people. Look at what they're doing to their people. Get along with this? They're on the march. Their stated objectives were as plain as day." Those of you who weren't around during all of this, the era of the Cold War and Soviet expansionism, it is imperative you find out. It is imperative you understand what this man did. It is imperative you understand how he did it.

It's not just that he did it without firing a shot. He did it because he refused to accept it, all alone amongst those at his leadership level. So he set us out on a course to win, not "manage," the Cold War, and I consider that to be the final battle of the Second World War. He freed tens of millions of people who had been imprisoned behind the Iron Curtain for nearly five decades. Those people survive Ronald Reagan today. In his obituary they should be mentioned as "survivors," and I noticed some liberal commentators now contend that the fall of the Soviet Union was "inevitable" just as they once considered the decline of American greatness inevitable. They still don't get it and they never will. Mid-90s I attended a lecture given by Lady Margaret Thatcher at the Waldorf in New York. She made a point of saying it was Reagan, not Gorbachev, who brought down the Soviet Union primarily by proposing SDI. It was at that moment that Gorbachev knew it was over because he knew we Americans could do SDI and his country couldn't.

Later, I had the good fortune to become close friends with Lady Thatcher, and I often reminded her of that lecture and her point, and she "commanded me," which is how she speaks. She commanded me to never allow people to think otherwise, never allow people to think that it was anyone other than Ronald Reagan and the spirit of America and its goodness and its faith in God that defeated the Soviet Union. I remember I went to a dinner at a private home in Manhattan, I was asked to give the toast. It was a dinner in honor of Lady Thatcher. The guests were the usual Manhattan elites, many media people network presidents. After Lady Thatcher's remarks when the hostess asked for questions, there were none. So I rose. I asked her, "Who won the Cold War?" She gave the same answer in her lecture to the dinner guests at this dinner. They sat in stone silence. They knew it. They didn't want to hear it. I wish I had had a camera so you would know who. I'm not going to say who was at this dinner, but I wish you could have seen their faces when she said it. Let me set the stage for you at this Manhattan dinner party. It doesn't matter who it is, because you don't need to know the names to know the type of people. Network presidents, programmers, media elites. It was a media elite dinner and I was there, and the reason I was there because of all the people invited I was the one qualified to offer the official toast to Lady Margaret Thatcher, and so I did. And Lady Thatcher, this was a dinner in her honor at this private home in Manhattan. After dinner the hostess asked her for some remarks. She made some brief remarks -- for her, brief, ten, 20 minutes. After they were over, the hostess opened it up for questions and there wasn't a person -- must have been about 25 or 30, not one person stood; not one person raised their hand, not one person had a question, and during her remarks, Lady Thatcher had not touched on the Cold War, but I had remembered being profoundly affected by her admission at this lecture that I attended with Justice Kennedy.

In fact, I was his guest at the Waldorf, and so I rose, and I said, "Lady Thatcher, could you explain? There's a lot of controversy being waged in the country right now about what brought about the end of the Soviet Union. Many people think that it would not have happened were it not for Gorbachev, that Gorbachev was a new leader, Perestroika, Glasnost. You were there. You were part of it. What's your view?" She got stern as she could be at the notion that Gorbachev had anything substantively to do with it. She stood up and she just went down the list of what it was and why it happened, and again she focused on the fact that because Reagan had the audacity, Reagan had the fortitude to proposed SDI. At the time, again -- and a lot of what I'm saying today, most of you in this audience have heard it -- but I'm hoping to reach people who have no concrete, direct memory or relationship with President Reagan because of your age or because you weren't paying attention.

But back then, SDI was regarded much as the whole war in Iraq is today. SDI was treated was treated as a joke; SDI was dangerous; SDI was going to blow up the world; SDI was impossible. It was typical liberalism: greatness couldn't be done. Greatness can't happen. "This is only going to kill us all! This is just the meanderings of a B-actor." I mean, you people have forgotten how absolutely mean-spirited the critics of Reagan were about him and to him personally. He never flinched, never cared. He smiled at it. But when she stood up and went through this list of things and made the point that it was at that moment Mikhail Gorbachev realized it was over because he couldn't keep up. His country couldn't do it and he knew Americans could create SDI. In fact, I've got a story, there's an AP story somewhere in the stack quoting Gennady Gerasimov who was one of the spokesmen back then saying this very thing, if you don't believe me and you don't believe Lady Thatcher, and when she stood up and gave this answer, there was no applause. There was no reaction.

The guests at this dinner sat stone faced because they knew it, but they didn't want to hear it. You know, Reagan did not "hasten the Soviet collapse." He was responsible for it, and he was practically alone in his confidence that Soviet communism would fail, and his reason for believing it would fail was simple, folks, and it's a reason that is eternal. He knew the Soviet Union would eventually collapse of its own immorality if pushed in the right places, so he pushed. Reagan was also concerned about an all-powerful judiciary undermining the will of the people and attempted to do something about that. He spent eight years appointing people to the federal bench who were committed to interpreting the Constitution, not rewriting it. One of the most brilliant minds on the court today, Antonin Scalia, is a Reagan appointee. Reagan is the one who elevated Rehnquist to chief justice. The liberals are still trying to reverse this impact of Reagan. They're still trying to reverse everything he did. That's what the Clinton presidency was about. It's what the Clinton campaign of '92 was about, was reversing the eighties. The whole reason for existence of liberalism, folks, in recent years has been to wipe out the memory of the 80s and rewrite it as something it wasn't: "Decade of greed, decade of selfishness." You know, lest we forget, Reagan was called many things by those who resented him. He was called a cowboy. Does that sound familiar? He was called a dunce. Does that sound familiar? What have I always told you by liberal playbook never changes? There are no new pages in it. He was called a danger. That sound familiar? He was going to blow up the world. Washington elites described his 49-state landslide in 1984 as "a triumph of greed and selfishness." I had to laugh over the weekend. Forty-nine-state landslide. Ronald Reagan received more popular votes than any president in history in 1984, and still there are pieces in the media this weekend, "Could Reagan beat Clinton?" Clinton never got 50% of the vote. It happen wouldn't be a contest.

You know, there was one debate in the 1980 presidential campaign, one debate, very near the election, and the Carter people thought that they were going to clean the clock of Ronald Reagan. They thought Reagan was a dunce and an idiot, and we all know what happened. You talk about deer-in-the-headlight eyes, that was Jimmy Carter in that whole debate. Ronald Reagan debated Bobby Kennedy in the 1960's. You will not believe the story of this. I forget what the subject matter was, but the Kennedy people couldn't wait for this. You know, Reagan was ascending after his Goldwater speech in '64, and the Kennedy crowd thought, "We're going to wipe the stage with this guy. This guy is nothing," the typical way that liberals look at conservatives, and particularly conservative leaders. When it was over, Bobby Kennedy called Pierre Salinger in Paris and said, "Don't you ever put me with this guy again. It's impossible." Reagan was real. He just connected one on one with everybody. He had no ego. None. He was totally comfortable with who he was. He liked who he was, and he liked everybody else.

As I said, Reagan's entire presidency became known as the "decade of greed" by Democrats who today claim to praise and venerate him. In fact, I will never forget after the election of 1984, I was in California. The Democrats, (Former California Democrat Senator) Alan Cranston was running around all over the state trying to tell old people that Reagan's reelection would cause them to lose their homes and their health care. Ever heard of that? Does that sound familiar? Twenty years ago. David Broder, I'm pretty sure, his first column in the Washington Post after Reagan's reelection called it :a triumph of greed and selfishness over citizenship,: meaning the 49-state landslide was from people who wanted theirs, who wanted their tax cut and to hell with the poor and disadvantaged and what have you. I think Broder also wrote -- Reagan was 69 when he was first took office -- Broder wrote, "He's too old to be in touch with anything." I haven't seen what Broder has said this weekend, but he was just an example.

They were all saying things like this because they hated Ronald Reagan, and don't let anybody tell you differently. They feared him, which was the reason for their hate. They could not outflank him. They couldn't relate to people as he could -- and they were the people who "had the common touch," they told us. They were the people who had the ability to understand what life was like for the average guy, and here's Ronald Reagan running circles around them. Of course they didn't like him. He posed a great threat. Reagan was accused of sexism; he was accused of racism; he was accused of heartlessness. They said he was responsible for homelessness and AIDS. They said he was going to start World War III and destroy the social safety net, including Social Security, the school lunch program. Sound familiar? See how left never changes? But Reagan was none of those things and did none of those things. He was wiser, he was smarter, and bigger than his detractors. Thankfully, he outwitted them all and for one primary reason. He had the truth on his side. He knew that it was us that would make all this happen, the American people, and he told us that repeatedly. Everybody loves hearing what's expected of them. Everybody loves -- well, everybody reacts. Most people react to great expectations laid before them, and that's what Reagan did. Reagan elevated our own expectations of ourselves and of our country and we rose to the challenge. He knew America and the American people better than anyone, especially those who sought to govern from inside the Beltway. I'll never forget, it was I think 1990, and I was at the 21 Club in New York for dinner with some friends. I had been doing this show for two years. I don't want to over-personalize this, but Ronald Reagan believed things happened for a reason, so he wasn't worried about little details and the ups and downs of things, because he looked the long view, saw the far-off distance and just had faith that it was going to be okay -- as long as America remained America.

Now two years into this program, and I'm being criticized, having things said about me that have never been said about me before, and I don't know how to deal with it. I'm getting advice from people. Should I respond to this stuff or should I ignore it? People said, "Well, if you respond to it you're sort of validating it. You're letting them know it bothers you. Just blow it off. Don't react to it." I said, "Yeah, but then people are going to think it's true if I don't respond to it." This was one of the early frustrations that I experienced during this program. People saying things about you that aren't true. The instinct is to fix it and change the record. But I never knew what. I mean, for those two years there was nobody who could tell me what to do. I was with no one who had been through it, and I really had no instinct myself what to do.

One night I'm at dinner, 21, and I had to go to the bathroom so I walked into the restroom. The restroom attendant in there recognized me and came up, shook my hand. He was just ebullient. He started taking. He knew who I was. He started talking about to me about the one time he met President Reagan, and he just was as effusive, full of love and excitement, exuberance as anybody I can recall, just happy to be telling me this. And after he went through describing what his meeting with Reagan was like, and it had been fairly recently, he looked at me, he cocked his head, his eyes got wide, and he said, "You know, Mr. Limbaugh, he never got mad at 'em. He never got mad at 'em once. He just laughed at 'em." I said, "Bingo. There's my answer." In the restroom at the 21 Club, from an attendant whose biggest thrill in life was having met Ronald Reagan. That man is a preacher today, that attendant.

America's Truth Detector and Doctor of Democracy, Rush Limbaugh, continuing now with a tribute to Ronald Reagan. Ladies and gentlemen, another thing that's important to remember. It wasn't just Democrats and liberals who criticized Ronald Reagan after he left office. Republicans in Washington (I will never forget this), Republicans in Washington also were weak in defending Reagan's policies after he left office. They were afraid to defend the tax cuts of the 1980's. They were afraid to defend the charge that the 80s was a decade of greed and selfishness. They were afraid to tell the truth of why deficits grew. The Clintons called the 80s "the worst economy in the last 50 years" in 1992, and many Republicans in Washington wouldn't stop and step up to remind people of the truth. Well, I did. I remember sitting here in the early years of this program aghast that members of Ronald Reagan's own party in Washington didn't have -- it wasn't all -- but didn't have the guts and the courage to stand up and defend him, particularly when it came to tax cuts and foreign policy: the two things that he was most profound on. Throughout the early years of this program it was an objective of mine to keep the Reagan legacy alive. I was a product of it. It's not even enough to say I believed it. I felt like I was part of it, that I would not have had the life I have were it not for Reagan. I understood it, and I believed in it, and I thought all Republicans did, too. What I learned later was that there were factions in the Republican Party. The old country club blue-blood set, they never liked Reagan because he displaced them, too. So when he was gone it was their turn to try to reassert themselves in control of the party. Well, that's what happened in the party, but this program is not the Republican Party. This program is conservatism and the Reagan legacy. You know, I wonder what Reagan would say to us about this new war, this war on terrorism, liberation of Iraq. So I went to his Pointe-Du-Hoc speech back in 1984, D-Day.

He said it was "the deep knowledge -- and pray God we've not lost it -- that there is a profound moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest." He said to the surviving Rangers who scaled the cliffs at Pointe-Du-Hoc on D-Day, "You were here to liberate, not to conquer and so you and those others did not doubt your cause and you were right not to doubt. We in America have learned bitter lessons from two world wars. It is better to be here ready to protect the peace than to take blind shelter across the sea rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was, never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent but we try always to be prepared for peace, prepared to deter aggression, prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms, and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation." Reagan was right just as George W. Bush is today, and I really believe that if Reagan had been able he would have put his hand on Bush's shoulder and say to him, "Stay the course, George." I really believe that.

As I said at the beginning of this hour, and I've been fighting it because this is not what Reagan was about, but since Saturday afternoon at four o'clock Eastern time, I haven honestly felt like a part of me died as well. Even though I knew it was coming, we all knew it was coming. I was surprised at how deeply the act of his passing had on me, despite knowing it was coming, and I was comforted all the remainder of the weekend by the reality and the realization that I know that Ronald Reagan lives on in my heart, always will, and in all of yours. I never met him. Wasn't necessary. It was not necessary to have met Ronald Reagan in order to love him as I do, and that is as good a measure of greatness which does not need to be explained as I know. So God bless Ronald Reagan, and as he never failed to say, God bless America.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: limbaugh; ronaldreagan; rush; rushlimbaugh; tribute
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
The Majarushie hits a grand slam worthy of the man.
1 posted on 06/07/2004 3:20:48 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy

ping for later read


2 posted on 06/07/2004 3:26:05 PM PDT by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

3 posted on 06/07/2004 3:35:00 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Was sciencediet till I found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Awesome. That's all I can say.


4 posted on 06/07/2004 3:36:36 PM PDT by Snake65 (Osama Bin Decomposing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
God bless you, Rush.


5 posted on 06/07/2004 3:37:35 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Liberals are social terrorists and seditionists. Treat them as such.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

bookmark bump


6 posted on 06/07/2004 3:44:19 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

I missed most of this on the radio. Thanks so much for posting it. Rush reaches millions, thank God.


7 posted on 06/07/2004 3:46:00 PM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snake65

Awesome. Just wonderful.


8 posted on 06/07/2004 3:46:58 PM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xp38

BUMP


9 posted on 06/07/2004 3:53:11 PM PDT by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

I haven't seen that one before...apart from the hat it could easily be W on his ranch. Maybe all Presidents should have ranches they work on.


10 posted on 06/07/2004 3:54:35 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lepton

When I turned on the tv on Saturday and heard CBS commentators saying nice things about Reagan, I immediately starting turning the channel because I knew right then that he must have died for them to be talking nicely about him...sure enough the other BS channels were on doing the same thing and my heart lurched into my stomach as I heard that he had indeed passed away. We need to proclaim the truth to this next generation so that they will know and be able to discern right from wrong.


11 posted on 06/07/2004 4:00:42 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: AGreatPer

I was moved when rush read this. I will print it and put it away for my 2 year old son to read when he's old enough to understand.

I did notice Rush's sadness last Friday.


13 posted on 06/07/2004 4:04:12 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xp38
You all might consider this piece:

"Ron and George: An Imagined Conversation"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1149369/posts

14 posted on 06/07/2004 4:04:45 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Bump for later.


15 posted on 06/07/2004 4:05:20 PM PDT by Springman (God has called Ronald Reagan home 6-5-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

GREAT PHOTO!!!


16 posted on 06/07/2004 4:05:35 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

I was moved when rush read this. I will print it and put it away for my 2 year old son to read when he's old enough to understand.

I did notice Rush's sadness last Friday.


17 posted on 06/07/2004 4:06:25 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xp38

I stayed by the radio today just to hear Rush and how he would honor President Reagan. I love Reagan too. I was in the fourth grade in 1980 and we had a mock election. Carter won! We were in a democratic county in Alabama. A little girl taunted me because I voted for Reagan. I remember her telling me Carter would win. Needless to say President Reagan won the real election. :)


18 posted on 06/07/2004 4:09:57 PM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

My son finishes his freshman year of high school tomorrow. I am sending him this as required reading for the beginning of summer vacation.


19 posted on 06/07/2004 4:11:42 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Absolutely beautiful and informative - I was one of those not paying a lot of attention in those days - although I always loved our president.

I am so thankful God has blessed us with these fine people to come in - take the lead - ignore the obstructionists and follow what they know is right.

Thank you God for giving us Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Rush Limbaugh. What would America have done without these people?


20 posted on 06/07/2004 4:12:42 PM PDT by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Bump to read later.


21 posted on 06/07/2004 4:15:32 PM PDT by SouthMountainBilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

it is sad. i tear up when i see a flag at half staff.

i appreciated drudge starting out with god bless america.

to ronald reagan and ayn rand i owe my dropping out of the democrat party.

you have to wonder, how could i be so wrong for so long? answer: youth and going to university.


22 posted on 06/07/2004 4:17:49 PM PDT by no_problema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Bumpttt.


23 posted on 06/07/2004 4:19:03 PM PDT by Rocko (Michael Moore: "Dude, I'm a hypocrite.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers; All

It is time for Rush to write another book. Especially now.


24 posted on 06/07/2004 4:20:56 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rocko

A wonderful tribute!


25 posted on 06/07/2004 4:22:11 PM PDT by Toto27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xp38
...you can tell how great a man is by his enemies.

In this day of self indulgence and free use of anyone and anything to serve one's own needs or ambition I am getting a "Pepcid" feeling in my gut.A Maalox moment is coming on.

If you will, cast your minds back to the days shortly after 9-11 and recall President Bush speaking at the National Cathedral.He was speaking to heal and to balm the national wounds.I remember being troubled by the adoring Media which could NOT keep its' cameras on Mr. Bush but instead lingered,fawning over Bill Clinton who just HAD to be present. I recall after the ceremony how Clinton stood outside in the center of the wide stone steps, so all who exited would have to march past in grief,Bubba the consoler, soaking up the attention like a sponge,ever needing to be the focal point.

President Reagan will be used by many as he lies in State.They will come before the presence of greatness,eager to be seen and held in the gravity of such a man,in the comet's tail as it were....

I urge you all to stock up on stomach remedies in the meantime ,and come let us devine together,who shall be the Grandest Media Whore of All?.

26 posted on 06/07/2004 4:24:47 PM PDT by Grendelgrey (....nay, we are but men..........Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no_problema

.


27 posted on 06/07/2004 4:26:20 PM PDT by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Maybe all Presidents should have ranches they work on.


Or simply be willing to work.

28 posted on 06/07/2004 4:31:52 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Was sciencediet till I found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Grendelgrey

Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are both positioning themselves for this honor.


29 posted on 06/07/2004 4:32:37 PM PDT by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
"My son finishes his freshman year of high school tomorrow. I am sending him this as required reading for the beginning of summer vacation."

My son just graduated from high school this year. Of course, he is at Ocean City, MD, frolicking with his class and what ever they do.

But I have printed this out and will be REQUIRED reading to get any more money. Ya know, they really don't give a ....... at this age.

Heck, who was president when you were in High School? Made you think, didn't it.

30 posted on 06/07/2004 4:32:50 PM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Exactly. I disagree with his reading of the New Deal but let that pass. Rush's point and one that's valid for as long as America exists, is that President Reagan did the right things for the right reasons. That's our 40th President's lasting legacy.


31 posted on 06/07/2004 4:34:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

BTTT


32 posted on 06/07/2004 4:42:57 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
I printed it out to read tonight.

I first "discovered" RR when I got used to listening to his daily radio addresses, after moving to Ca. in 1973. He made so much sense to me that he was instrumental in transforming me from a college-cultured liberal idealist into a self-reliant rugged individualist conservative, and I was greatly encouraged and energized with the advent of the '80's. For this fifty-year-old, it was the greatest leap from one decade of history to another.

We were fortunate to buy our first home in the beautiful Simi Valley in 1982, where we lived until 1988. We visited the Reagan Library when our middle son was in the 3rd grade ('93) which so impressed him that he spent the next year studying the Presidents and not only handwriting a brief biography of each one, but drawing a portrait of each President using a book from the library as a guide!

A visit to Cal. is not complete without a visit to this wonderful and inspiring place. It is truly heartwarming for us to know that he will rest in peace here overlooking the beautiful Tierra Rejada valley.

33 posted on 06/07/2004 4:46:31 PM PDT by onehipdad (Make no mistake, we are now engaged in World War III....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
As always Rush is right on. It was good to hear this today because it needed to be said because there will be plenty of lamestream media trying to dumb down America on President Reagan accomplishments.
34 posted on 06/07/2004 4:51:45 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

I just finished listening on 24/7. This was one of his best shows ever.


35 posted on 06/07/2004 4:52:17 PM PDT by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Fox (maybe on Brit or John) did a side by side of many of the similarities of the two - chainsawing, etc.


36 posted on 06/07/2004 4:53:31 PM PDT by mathluv (Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

Did not have to think. Reagan was president when I got out! I actually noticed on my own in those days how the press lambasted him no matter what he did, and it occurred to me that I liked him better than I trusted the press. Been a registered Republican ever since.


37 posted on 06/07/2004 4:54:12 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EmilyGeiger

...smart wagering on those two.Where will Al Gore sit? Will Jesse attend? Will Bubba leave the service laughing, spot a camera and turn to tears in mid stride?....OH the choices....


38 posted on 06/07/2004 4:56:17 PM PDT by Grendelgrey (....nay, we are but men..........Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xp38

BTTT


39 posted on 06/07/2004 5:11:04 PM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Thank you so much for posting this. I normally listen to Rush for about 30 minutes during lunch then it's back to work. Today, I especially wanted to hear the full 3 hours of the broadcast but I just couldn't. I was hoping that someone would post it so I could read the rest of it.

Just like President Reagan has won a special place in heart, so has Rush and I wanted very much to listen to him today. Thank you again my fellow freeper.

40 posted on 06/07/2004 5:11:13 PM PDT by quesera (I try my best to be tolerant of the left but John Kerry is such a jackass he doesn't make it easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

41 posted on 06/07/2004 5:12:55 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy

ping to save


42 posted on 06/07/2004 5:14:03 PM PDT by crude77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
Rush captured one thing perfectly. We all knew this time was coming, and we further knew it would bring relief to those who President Reagan loved most, to know that he was at peace.

But it still feels like being punched hard in the stomach.

43 posted on 06/07/2004 5:17:03 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rocko

44 posted on 06/07/2004 5:17:47 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I will always remember President Reagan as the guy who won the Cold War for us, and as the President who gave the military back their pride and their respectability.

[I had just entered the Air Force when Reagan was inaugurated.]

45 posted on 06/07/2004 5:25:37 PM PDT by Siegfried
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Excellent.



"The American Dream isn't one of making government bigger, it's keeping faith with the mighty spirit of free people under God." - Ronald Reagan

46 posted on 06/07/2004 5:29:16 PM PDT by k2blader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

I heard this on the show, and it is still a pleasure to read it here. This explains his bad mood on Friday that he wouldn't tell us about. I too recall the hatred the left had for President Reagan, and much of the same things are being repeated now about President Bush.

I know it is great that the media is heaping praise on him now that he is gone, but it is also a little sickening. They should have done it while he could appreciate it.


47 posted on 06/07/2004 5:34:16 PM PDT by ladyinred (RIP Governor/President Reagan, ride peacefully into that sunset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Rush was excellent today, and he well expressed how many of us feel.

I have missed Reagan since he left office. He gave us quite a thrilling ride and it was very painful when it had reached the end. If it were possible I would have been more than happy to have him in office for the rest of my life.

48 posted on 06/07/2004 5:34:33 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH ( A vote for George Bush is a principled vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

bumped for all to read


49 posted on 06/07/2004 5:53:16 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesera

It's actually an honor to post great commentary like this and spread it further.


50 posted on 06/07/2004 6:02:09 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson