Posted on 06/10/2004 12:54:17 PM PDT by bolobaby
All,
I searched using every parameter I could think of, but I can't track down this article that was posted here a couple of days ago.
I believe it was either a Fortune or a Forbes article. It specifically compared the debt incurred under Reagan to the growth in the value of the nation's assets. Something like $16 trillion to $33 trillion for only $1 trillion in debt. Or something like that.
Anyone have the link?
Thanks!
I don't know the title of the piece, but it was written by Rich Karlgaard, the publisher of Forbes. It ran on Forbes.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.