CNN's Cooper and Gupta Bemoan Reagan's Indifference to AIDS(CNN's INDIFFERENCE to the FACTS)

MRC ^ | Thursday June 10, 2004 | BrentBaker

[fight_truth_decay]

bi-sexual cheating scum don't seem to feel bad about giving their wives the disease

or multiple partners.. weapons of mass destruction?

[supercat]

Thought experiment for liberals: suppose that an installer fails to properly seal a washing machine's drain and it leaks a little bit when the machine is used. Which is the better course of action:

1. Have the drain fixed as soon as practical and hold off on using the machine until then; bill the plumber for the cost of fixing the drain and for the cost of using a laundromat while the machine was unusable.
2. Continue to use the machine and avoid doing anything about the problem until the floor rots out. Sue the plumber for $20,000 to rebuild the floor and replace property that was on or underneath it.

There is a certain mindset that would suggest #2 is the better course of action, since it allows the homeowner to win more in a lawsuit.

[Billthedrill]

Good grief, not this again. Reagan was a Hollywood actor, for Pete's sake - he knew all about homosexuality and was good friends with a number of gay people. How could he have a career there and not be?

He was particularly close to Rock Hudson. Read HERE for a defense of Reagan from Hudson's lover. It might surprise some people.

[FITZ]

Every president after Reagan has talked about AIDS and it has not made the problem a faint memory.....so what gives???????????

It's strange --- talk hasn't stopped the spread of AIDS --- I think if anything all the government money poured into the issue only keeps it spreading --- if they would have quarantined all HIV positive cases and allowed them to die from the disease, it would have spread more slowly. Talking or not talking makes no difference either way.