But.. but.. the UN SAID that stuff wasn't there!
They couldn't have lied or spoke too soon, could they?
Wonder how long until the spin begins, if it hasn't already?
And of course this will all end up being President Bush's fault. WMD in Iraq? How was it that he knew and did not act even sooner? What did he know and when did he know it? yadda yadda yadda.
I don't think they'll want to spin this one. Instead, each revelation will be blandly reported deep within newspapers and newscasts as to draw as little attention as possible - or completely ignored when that can be accomplished.
You missed their update the other day. They now say Saddam had WMD, but they were all destroyed. So I guess this new UN stance is the change to the change.
Actually, they did say that they were there...before they said they weren't...
OK lets start the betting:
Five bucks sez that the new talking points will be:
"See, it was stupid to attack Iraq because the WMD's that Saddam didn't have are now in the hands of other hostile countries!"