Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Halliburton spending hit
Bergen Record ^ | 6-15-2004 | Seth Borenstein

Posted on 06/15/2004 6:12:34 AM PDT by jmc813

Halliburton Inc. paid high-priced bills for common items, such as soda, laundry, and hotels, in Iraq and Kuwait and then passed the inflated costs along to taxpayers, according to several former Halliburton employees and a Pentagon internal audit.

Democrats in the House of Representatives, who are feuding with House Republicans over whether the spending should be publicly aired at a hearing Tuesday, released signed statements Monday by five ex-Halliburton employees recounting the lavish spending.

Those former employees contend that the firm:

# Lodged 100 workers at a five-star hotel in Kuwait for a total of $10,000 a day while the Pentagon wanted them to stay in tents, like soldiers, at $139 a night.

# Abandoned $85,000 trucks because of flat tires and minor problems.

# Paid $100 to have a 15-pound bag of laundry cleaned as part of a million-dollar laundry contract in peaceful Kuwait. The price for cleaning the same amount of laundry in war-torn Iraq was $28.

# Spent $1.50 a can to buy 37,200 cans of soda in Kuwait, about 24 times higher than the contract price.

# Knowingly paid subcontractors twice for the same bill.

Halliburton, which was formerly headed by Vice President Dick Chaney, is already under fire for allegations of overcharging the Pentagon for fuel and soldiers' meals. The latest accusations center on whether Halliburton properly keeps track of its bills from subcontractors, Pentagon auditors said in a month-old report released Monday by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

The 36-page report by the Defense Contract Audit Agency said Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root had a billing system that was "inadequate," had numerous deficiencies and billing misstatements, and that KBR didn't follow laws and regulations relating to spending and record keeping.

Its contracting practices are so bad, the auditors said, that KBR shouldn't be allowed to bill the Pentagon directly without the government poring over every detail in advance.

Statements by the whistle-blowers - five of whom were identified - and the government's audit report "portray a company and a contracting environment that has run amok," Waxman wrote in a letter to Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., on Monday.

Halliburton disputed the auditor's report and said Waxman was politically motivated.

Wendy Hall, a company spokeswoman, said Waxman's allegations do nothing "to feed a single member of our military, create a single unit of housing, repair a single oil well, or supply a single piece of material for reconstruction."

But one former Halliburton subcontracting manager, Marie deYoung, said in her signed statement that she had seen "significant waste and overpricing."

"Halliburton rarely collected adequate information from subcontractors to justify payment of invoices. When I attempted to properly verify invoice terms before setting up payment authorization, I was chastised," said DeYoung, a former Army captain and chaplain who resigned from the company last month.

DeYoung said Halliburton's financial staff lives at the five-star Kempinski Julai'a Hotel and Resort in Kuwait. "For a three-month period, the Kempinski hotel charged almost $1 million to house 100 Halliburton employees.

"By comparison, it costs less than $200,000 a year to lease tents that could house 400 soldiers. ... The military requested that Halliburton move into tents, but Halliburton refused."

Hall didn't respond to the specific charges made by DeYoung and other employees, but said, "There are clear inaccuracies in these assertions. We take any charges of improper conduct seriously."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: halliburton

1 posted on 06/15/2004 6:12:35 AM PDT by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I wouldn't be surprised if all this is true. Govt contractors can be awfully greedy.


2 posted on 06/15/2004 6:15:47 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

If I'm a contractor working for Halliburton/KBR and they tell me I'm going to live in a tent? No way...


3 posted on 06/15/2004 6:19:41 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Not without lots of money and accrued vacation time.


4 posted on 06/15/2004 6:20:31 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"By comparison, it costs less than $200,000 a year to lease tents that could house 400 soldiers. ... The military requested that Halliburton move into tents, but Halliburton refused."
The difference between the US Army and Halliburton is that Halliburton's employees can quit if they don't like the accomodations. Halliburton has to do something to make people willing to work in hostile territory.
My husband worked in the in the Alaska oilfields right after the pipleline was completed. Companies like Halliburton had to threw money around all the time-- one effect was to keep the workforce happy under very severe working conditions.
I'm not justifying it or criticizing it. I'm just telling how it was, and how I think it is.
5 posted on 06/15/2004 6:20:46 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"By comparison, it costs less than $200,000 a year to lease tents that could house 400 soldiers. ... The military requested that Halliburton move into tents, but Halliburton refused."

I would not work for a Fortune 500 company that would house its employees in a tent. They are not in the army. They are civilians and are entitled to be treated and housed as such.
6 posted on 06/15/2004 6:20:59 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dakine

......hey, it's not just ANY tent....it's a $139.00 a night tent!


WTF? $139.00 a night?


7 posted on 06/15/2004 6:21:49 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
WTF? $139.00 a night?

The tents have a lighted "Marriott" logo on the outside, so it's worth it to go with a trusted brand. ;)

8 posted on 06/15/2004 6:24:21 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Lodged 100 workers at a five-star hotel in Kuwait for a total of $10,000 a day while the Pentagon wanted them to stay in tents, like soldiers, at $139 a night.

Is this $139/night per worker or for all of them?

9 posted on 06/15/2004 6:25:02 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
# Lodged 100 workers at a five-star hotel in Kuwait for a total of $10,000 a day while the Pentagon wanted them to stay in tents, like soldiers, at $139 a night

Let's see, $10,000 divided by 100 = $100 per night per person. It sounds like they saved $39 bucks per night, per person, for a total savings of $3900 per day.
10 posted on 06/15/2004 6:28:20 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
""By comparison, it costs less than $200,000 a year to lease tents that could house 400 soldiers."

Based on this paragraph further down in the "story," I think the $139/night was a per worker cost. If it were for the 100 of them, the total annual cost would be $50,735.00

The per night cost must be $13,900. Therefore, it costs more to put them in tents.

11 posted on 06/15/2004 6:29:54 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

One of the complaints you hear these days is that Halliburton (or any other contractor, for that matter) is being paid to do a lot of the functions that U.S. military personnel once did themselves. My guess is that the difference in cost between the two is not all that great. Having a private contractor do these things costs more on the spot, but a contractor doesn't have to be kept on active duty for years waiting for the time that he becomes useful.


12 posted on 06/15/2004 6:34:00 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

""By comparison, it costs less than $200,000 a year to lease tents that could house 400 soldiers."
Based on this paragraph further down in the "story," I think the $139/night was a per worker cost. If it were for the 100 of them, the total annual cost would be $50,735.00

The per night cost must be $13,900. Therefore, it costs more to put them in tents.

Using their numbers, to house 400 costs $200,000/yr; 100 costs 50,000/yr, or the $139 per night per 100.


13 posted on 06/15/2004 6:41:32 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
The per night cost must be $13,900. Therefore, it costs more to put them in tents.

I don't see how this sentence was supported by the rest of your post. The $139 a night seems to be for the entire group (100).

14 posted on 06/15/2004 6:51:51 AM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Oops. Sorry - by bad.

"The per night cost must be $13,900. Therefore, it costs more to put them in tents." was a quote of Sauropod's, not mine. I forgot to quote properly...


15 posted on 06/15/2004 7:14:19 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

Ah, OK. I agree, then. :)


16 posted on 06/15/2004 7:21:35 AM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Govt per diem rates for civilian contractors in Kuwait City is $344/day...lodging, meals, and incidentals.


17 posted on 06/15/2004 7:25:45 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
If Haliburton doesn't do the dirty work, who else will? What other company is set up to do all that Haliburton does?
18 posted on 06/15/2004 7:29:51 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Spent $1.50 a can to buy 37,200 cans of soda in Kuwait, about 24 times higher than the contract price

Waxman wants them to supply soda at 6.25 cents per can?

19 posted on 06/15/2004 7:29:56 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
If Haliburton doesn't do the dirty work, who else will? What other company is set up to do all that Haliburton does?

The Democratic Party of course.

20 posted on 06/15/2004 7:34:43 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Tax energy not labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
Precisely. Who else?

As for housing, as a civillian, would you go into an area where vehicle bombs are a possibility, and stay in a tent which will let in dust (messes up the computers), without air conditioning in the desert?

I did something not so different in Nevada on a wellsite years ago, (no terrorist threat) but I was a lot hungrier then. Now? No way.

Look at the Gubmint perdiem rate for DC. Then let them go ahead and carp about it. Nevada was $26 per day.

21 posted on 06/15/2004 7:40:22 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Would you mind waiting until after I light this to start hacking and coughing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Every news story has a bottom line...the bottom line for this one is:

"Halliburton, which was formerly headed by Vice President Dick Chaney..."

Otherwise there is not too much unusual about this story, when you take into account the past stories of $900 hammers and all of the other "fleece" awards the government garners.

Back in the '60's when I was in the USAF, they were paying almost $3 per screw for the screws that held the AIM missiles together, and there were plenty per missile.

The Haliburton expenses are a drop in the bucket compared to what is spent each year on worthless enviromental and junk science on the left side of the aisle.

$1.50 per soda? That's about the same as any local convenience store charges, and they don't have to have them flown in.

Having retired from a major corporation, I can attest to the fact that they are big spenders, and highly unlikely to put their staff up in "tents". Where I worked spent at least 4 times my salary for one, two-day sales meeting. There were times they rented whole motels for whole weekends, at major water attractions for a "team building" exercise. Now, as it was a major utility, they passed their expenses on to the customer, just like the government does.

The press is trying to take something that is not at all out of the ordinary, and turn it into a Cheney (thus, Bush) bashing escapade.

I'm sure this pales in comparison to all of the "meals on wheels" deployments when der slickmeister was in charge.
22 posted on 06/15/2004 7:43:29 AM PDT by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of charity that you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Bullshit. Giving Halliburton the contract without a bidding war led to this kind of waste.

Here's another article on this mess:

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/8922543.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

The key points:


-Abandoned $85,000 trucks because of flat tires and minor problems.

-Paid $100 to have a 15-pound bag of laundry cleaned as part of a million-dollar laundry contract in peaceful Kuwait. The price for cleaning the same amount of laundry in war-torn Iraq was $28.

But one former Halliburton subcontracting manager, Marie deYoung, said in her signed statement that she had seen "significant waste and overpricing."


"Halliburton rarely collected adequate information from subcontractors to justify payment of invoices. When I attempted to properly verify invoice terms before setting up payment authorization, I was chastised," said deYoung, a former Army captain and chaplain who resigned from the company last month.


Last week, Halliburton revealed that it's being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission over allegations of bribery in Nigeria for the late 1990s, when Vice President Dick Cheney was in charge of the firm. Last month, a dozen truckers told Knight Ridder that Halliburton sent them back and forth across Iraq with empty trailers more than 100 times.


---

Sounds like waste to me.


23 posted on 06/15/2004 8:15:04 AM PDT by MaxPlus305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MaxPlus305

My bad, I was looking at another FR article on this. But the point still stands...the tent thing may be understandable, but many of the other problems of alleged waste are not as explainable.


24 posted on 06/15/2004 8:21:36 AM PDT by MaxPlus305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sloth; azhenfud
Well, its not exactly clear from the article, is it?

The $139 figure could be read either way. This is sloppy reporting.

Note also how they had to put Dick Cheney's name in the article, even though he had nothing to do with the supposed financial abuses.

25 posted on 06/15/2004 10:07:11 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

"Halliburton" ping


26 posted on 06/15/2004 10:15:10 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Clara Lou said: "My husband worked in the in the Alaska oilfields right after the pipleline was completed. Companies like Halliburton had to threw money around all the time-- one effect was to keep the workforce happy under very severe working conditions. "

The company I worked for hired a cook who formerly worked on the pipeline. The food he served in our cafeteria was extremely high quality with mouth-watering variety. The company subsidy for the cafeteria was probably not enough to cover the unexpected expenses. It was great while it lasted.

27 posted on 06/15/2004 12:30:57 PM PDT by William Tell (Californians! See "www.rkba.members.sonic.net" to support California RKBA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
The company I worked for hired a cook who formerly worked on the pipeline. The food he served in our cafeteria was extremely high quality with mouth-watering variety.
My husband said the food served in the camps up on the North Slope was excellent. The companies fed those guys right-- good cooks and good menus. They had to. Those people worked 2 weeks on and 1 week off, or 3 weeks on and 1 off. Some worked a month on and a month off-- just flew straight to the Lower 48 for that month off. Things like food and entertainment and good pay were what enabled those men to work in the dead of winter at -50º or -60º. I imagine that's what Haliburton is dealing with right now in Iraq.
28 posted on 06/15/2004 12:50:57 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dakine
If I'm a contractor working for Halliburton/KBR and they tell me I'm going to live in a tent? No way...

Well, it happens.

Not on anything but a temporary basis, but it happens.

29 posted on 06/16/2004 3:32:48 AM PDT by Allegra (This dog bite me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Oh, I'm aware of that, I had to put up contractors in tents on Al Jabar, they were making big bucks on perdiem, so they weren't complaining....
We also supplied them with desert BDUs, flak vests, and chem gear...


30 posted on 06/16/2004 4:38:46 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dakine
We also supplied them with desert BDUs, flak vests, and chem gear...

Yeah, we have all of that. I'm not in a tent, but newcomers have had to stay in them for a couple of weeks on occasion as the camp grew.

31 posted on 06/16/2004 4:59:37 AM PDT by Allegra (This dog bite me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson