Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
You have to love Thomas: What he is saying is that he agrees that the Respondent lacked standing to sue in the first place, but if he -- Judge Thomas -- had to decide the case on the merits he would reverse Lee. Thomas really is brilliant in ways that don't always show through Scallia. History will prove Thomas as one of the most significant SCOTUS jurists of our time.
3 posted on 06/15/2004 6:26:44 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Labyrinthos
You have to love Thomas: What he is saying is that he agrees that the Respondent lacked standing to sue in the first place....

How do you figure based on his statement:

Because I agree with The Chief Justice that respondent Newdow has standing,

But I agree, I do have to love Thomas... ;-/

4 posted on 06/15/2004 6:30:43 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson