Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Inquisition: Investigating the popular myth.
National Review Online ^ | June 18, 2004 | Thomas F. Madden

Posted on 06/18/2004 9:55:45 AM PDT by xsysmgr

When the sins of the Catholic Church are recited (as they so often are) the Inquisition figures prominently. People with no interest in European history know full well that it was led by brutal and fanatical churchmen who tortured, maimed, and killed those who dared question the authority of the Church. The word "Inquisition" is part of our modern vocabulary, describing both an institution and a period of time. Having one of your hearings referred to as an "Inquisition" is not a compliment for most senators.

But in recent years the Inquisition has been subject to greater investigation. In preparation for the Jubilee in 2000, Pope John Paul II wanted to find out just what happened during the time of the Inquisition's (the institution's) existence. In 1998 the Vatican opened the archives of the Holy Office (the modern successor to the Inquisition) to a team of 30 scholars from around the world. Now at last the scholars have made their report, an 800-page tome that was unveiled at a press conference in Rome on Tuesday. Its most startling conclusion is that the Inquisition was not so bad after all. Torture was rare and only about 1 percent of those brought before the Spanish Inquisition were actually executed. As one headline read "Vatican Downsizes Inquisition."

The amazed gasps and cynical sneers that have greeted this report are just further evidence of the lamentable gulf that exists between professional historians and the general public. The truth is that, although this report makes use of previously unavailable material, it merely echoes what numerous scholars have previously learned from other European archives. Among the best recent books on the subject are Edward Peters's Inquisition (1988) and Henry Kamen's The Spanish Inquisition (1997), but there are others. Simply put, historians have long known that the popular view of the Inquisition is a myth. So what is the truth?

To understand the Inquisition we have to remember that the Middle Ages were, well, medieval. We should not expect people in the past to view the world and their place in it the way we do today. (You try living through the Black Death and see how it changes your attitude.) For people who lived during those times, religion was not something one did just at church. It was science, philosophy, politics, identity, and hope for salvation. It was not a personal preference but an abiding and universal truth. Heresy, then, struck at the heart of that truth. It doomed the heretic, endangered those near him, and tore apart the fabric of community.

The Inquisition was not born out of desire to crush diversity or oppress people; it was rather an attempt to stop unjust executions. Yes, you read that correctly. Heresy was a crime against the state. Roman law in the Code of Justinian made it a capital offense. Rulers, whose authority was believed to come from God, had no patience for heretics. Neither did common people, who saw them as dangerous outsiders who would bring down divine wrath. When someone was accused of heresy in the early Middle Ages, they were brought to the local lord for judgment, just as if they had stolen a pig or damaged shrubbery (really, it was a serious crime in England). Yet in contrast to those crimes, it was not so easy to discern whether the accused was really a heretic. For starters, one needed some basic theological training — something most medieval lords sorely lacked. The result is that uncounted thousands across Europe were executed by secular authorities without fair trials or a competent assessment of the validity of the charge.

The Catholic Church's response to this problem was the Inquisition, first instituted by Pope Lucius III in 1184. It was born out of a need to provide fair trials for accused heretics using laws of evidence and presided over by knowledgeable judges. From the perspective of secular authorities, heretics were traitors to God and the king and therefore deserved death. From the perspective of the Church, however, heretics were lost sheep who had strayed from the flock. As shepherds, the pope and bishops had a duty to bring them back into the fold, just as the Good Shepherd had commanded them. So, while medieval secular leaders were trying to safeguard their kingdoms, the Church was trying to save souls. The Inquisition provided a means for heretics to escape death and return to the community.

As this new report confirms, most people accused of heresy by the Inquisition were either acquitted or their sentences suspended. Those found guilty of grave error were allowed to confess their sin, do penance, and be restored to the Body of Christ. The underlying assumption of the Inquisition was that, like lost sheep, heretics had simply strayed. If, however, an inquisitor determined that a particular sheep had purposely left the flock, there was nothing more that could be done. Unrepentant or obstinate heretics were excommunicated and given over to secular authorities. Despite popular myth, the Inquisition did not burn heretics. It was the secular authorities that held heresy to be a capital offense, not the Church. The simple fact is that the medieval Inquisition saved uncounted thousands of innocent (and even not-so-innocent) people who would otherwise have been roasted by secular lords or mob rule.

During the 13th century the Inquisition became much more formalized in its methods and practices. Highly trained Dominicans answerable to the Pope took over the institution, creating courts that represented the best legal practices in Europe. As royal authority grew during the 14th century and beyond, control over the Inquisition slipped out of papal hands and into those of kings. Instead of one Inquisition there were now many. Despite the prospect of abuse, monarchs like those in Spain and France generally did their best to make certain that their inquisitions remained both efficient and merciful. During the 16th century, when the witch craze swept Europe, it was those areas with the best-developed inquisitions that stopped the hysteria in its tracks. In Spain and Italy, trained inquisitors investigated charges of witches' sabbaths and baby roasting and found them to be baseless. Elsewhere, particularly in Germany, secular or religious courts burned witches by the thousands.

Compared to other medieval secular courts, the Inquisition was positively enlightened. Why then are people in general and the press in particular so surprised to discover that the Inquisition did not barbecue people by the millions? First of all, when most people think of the Inquisition today what they are really thinking of is the Spanish Inquisition. No, not even that is correct. They are thinking of the myth of the Spanish Inquisition. Amazingly, before 1530 the Spanish Inquisition was widely hailed as the best run, most humane court in Europe. There are actually records of convicts in Spain purposely blaspheming so that they could be transferred to the prisons of the Spanish Inquisition. After 1530, however, the Spanish Inquisition began to turn its attention to the new heresy of Lutheranism. It was the Protestant Reformation and the rivalries it spawned that would give birth to the myth.

By the mid 16th century, Spain was the wealthiest and most powerful country in Europe. Europe's Protestant areas, including the Netherlands, northern Germany, and England, may not have been as militarily mighty, but they did have a potent new weapon: the printing press. Although the Spanish defeated Protestants on the battlefield, they would lose the propaganda war. These were the years when the famous "Black Legend" of Spain was forged. Innumerable books and pamphlets poured from northern presses accusing the Spanish Empire of inhuman depravity and horrible atrocities in the New World. Opulent Spain was cast as a place of darkness, ignorance, and evil.

Protestant propaganda that took aim at the Spanish Inquisition drew liberally from the Black Legend. But it had other sources as well. From the beginning of the Reformation, Protestants had difficulty explaining the 15-century gap between Christ's institution of His Church and the founding of the Protestant churches. Catholics naturally pointed out this problem, accusing Protestants of having created a new church separate from that of Christ. Protestants countered that their church was the one created by Christ, but that it had been forced underground by the Catholic Church. Thus, just as the Roman Empire had persecuted Christians, so its successor, the Roman Catholic Church, continued to persecute them throughout the Middle Ages. Inconveniently, there were no Protestants in the Middle Ages, yet Protestant authors found them there anyway in the guise of various medieval heretics. In this light, the medieval Inquisition was nothing more than an attempt to crush the hidden, true church. The Spanish Inquisition, still active and extremely efficient at keeping Protestants out of Spain, was for Protestant writers merely the latest version of this persecution. Mix liberally with the Black Legend and you have everything you need to produce tract after tract about the hideous and cruel Spanish Inquisition. And so they did.

In time, Spain's empire would fade away. Wealth and power shifted to the north, in particular to France and England. By the late 17th century new ideas of religious tolerance were bubbling across the coffeehouses and salons of Europe. Inquisitions, both Catholic and Protestant, withered. The Spanish stubbornly held on to theirs, and for that they were ridiculed. French philosophes like Voltaire saw in Spain a model of the Middle Ages: weak, barbaric, superstitious. The Spanish Inquisition, already established as a bloodthirsty tool of religious persecution, was derided by Enlightenment thinkers as a brutal weapon of intolerance and ignorance. A new, fictional Spanish Inquisition had been constructed, designed by the enemies of Spain and the Catholic Church.

Now a bit more of the real Inquisition has come back into view. The question remains, will anyone take notice?

Thomas F. Madden is professor and chair of the department of history at Saint Louis University in St. Louis, Missouri. He is the author most recently of Enrico Dandolo and the Rise of Venice and editor of the forthcoming Crusades: The Illustrated History.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: catholic; inquisition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-388 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2004 9:55:46 AM PDT by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: razorbak
Its most startling conclusion is that the Inquisition was not so bad after all.

Nope, not so bad at all. And Hitler just had an off day.

2 posted on 06/18/2004 9:58:23 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Just read this. Wonder if it will get a bite from the Catholic bashers.


3 posted on 06/18/2004 9:59:12 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; Ippolita


4 posted on 06/18/2004 9:59:50 AM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Don't let the facts get in your way. Keep making smart ass remarks.


5 posted on 06/18/2004 10:00:19 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Good article. I have saved it.


6 posted on 06/18/2004 10:00:53 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
The invention of the printing press scared the hell out of the Catholic church. The church was no longer the only source of spiritual information for the people.

As a result, the inquisition was invented to insure that the people were obeying the teachings of the Catholic Church and were not being contaminated by reading the actual scriptures.

This is a sad part of your history.

7 posted on 06/18/2004 10:01:25 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Wonder if it will get a bite from the Catholic bashers

LOL! Maybe that's what we'll rename the Inquisition!

"Catholic Bashers" (since they went around bashing heads, etc)

Gives it a whole new meaning, doesn't it?

So....I guess the Catholic Bashers have shown up, eh?

8 posted on 06/18/2004 10:03:28 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hunble

Did you even bother to read the article? I thought not. The printing press was not invented until the 1450s and the Inquisition in Spain was all about Judaephobia, not suppression of heretical tracts.


9 posted on 06/18/2004 10:04:01 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Not so bad??? LOL a bit of denial there I think


10 posted on 06/18/2004 10:04:17 AM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
not suppression of heretical tracts

Jack Chick must be what....450 years old?

11 posted on 06/18/2004 10:05:16 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

As I suggested if the facts get in the way of your prejudices, just run them over.


12 posted on 06/18/2004 10:05:46 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"Compared to other medieval secular courts, the Inquisition was positively enlightened."

Maybe, but that doesn't change the fact that the focus was to force people to believe very specific things. If nothing else, I hope they learned that you can't force someone to believe something. You can only force them to pretend they believe.

13 posted on 06/18/2004 10:07:07 AM PDT by MEGoody (Kerry - isn't that a girl's name? (Conan O'Brian))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Caution! 8 meg wav file

14 posted on 06/18/2004 10:09:59 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (I want to die in my sleep like Gramps -- not yelling and screaming like those in his car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
The Spanish defeated Protestant armies on the battlefield? Where? As I recall, the Spanish attempt to invade England ended rather badly, and Spain was never the same afterward.

Also, he fails to point out that the primary reason for establishing the Spanish Inquisition was to hunt out Jews who had converted to Christianity *under duress* and were still secretly practicing Judaism, and that the Spanish Inquisition was at one point condemned by Rome for its brutality.

15 posted on 06/18/2004 10:11:12 AM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Did you know that when Gutenburg published his first Bible that there were already perhaps 10,000 Paris Bibles in circulation? These were small enough to slip into your pocket and were the first--ever-- to include all the books of the Bible in a handy form. It was a Latin Bible, but that meant that every literate person in Europe had direct access to all the Scriptures. This was true for the first time in history.


16 posted on 06/18/2004 10:16:11 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
The invention of the printing press scared the hell out of the Catholic church. The church was no longer the only source of spiritual information for the people.

More revisionist crapola. Gutenberg received most of his financing from the Catholic Church and the first book he printed was the Bible.

Mommy and daddy didn't make the mistake of paying for that rotten education you got, did they?

17 posted on 06/18/2004 10:17:52 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
As I suggested if the facts get in the way of your prejudices, just run them over.

How many people would OJ Simpson have to kill to be guilty of murder?

Answer:  More than two, obviously.

How many people must the Inquisition put to death to be an unforgiveable atrocity?

Answer:  The heretics were put to death by merciful religious people, thus saving them from being put to death by those awful secularists.  It isn't the quantity of death, so much as the quality the redeems.
18 posted on 06/18/2004 10:21:05 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Thank you for posting this.  Excellent and enlightening article.
 

Owl_Eagle

" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"


19 posted on 06/18/2004 10:21:16 AM PDT by South Hawthorne (Meat, it's what you're made of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I have read the article and understand what you are talking about. I love to study history and have done so for well 30 years now.

As a member of the Wicca religion, I often hear about the Inquisition and it's torture of Witches. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

This was not an issue about Witches, but a political effort to insure that the Catholic Church remained in control of the people.

Yes, as you just stated, prior to the invention of the printing press, many people started questioning what was being taught by the "official" Catholic Church. As a result of these questions, the Inquisition was created.

Once the printing press was invented, it became a crisis for the Catholic Church.

No longer were they the only people with the books and knowledge about God and Jesus. To their horror, anyone was able to read the actual words, if they had the education to read Latin.

Spain was at the focus of this religious battle. Not only would the ability to read the actual words of the Bible create problems, but it would place the authority of the King in question.

Remember, at that time, all Kings were authorized by God to rule their countries.

To question the what God had told the people, by reading the actual words in the Bible, was a very real danger to their authority to rule. This would be treason.

Like you, I did find this article most interesting and will consider it as valid data.

20 posted on 06/18/2004 10:21:21 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson