Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The EU constitution: a guide to its key features
Sunday Telegraph (Daily Telegraph) ^ | 20 June 2004 | Daniel Hannan

Posted on 06/20/2004 10:53:48 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
NOTE THIS: "This constitution", says Article I-5 "shall have primacy over the laws of the Member States." A little-noticed declaration adds that EU law is supreme, not just over parliamentary statutes, but also over national constitutions.

Blair in the UK, Persson in Sweden and I'm sure other heads of Governments say: "Nothing to see here. Just move on - a cleaning up exercise."

We citizens of states in Europe are in a fight for our continued freedoms - such as they are.

ScaniaBoy

1 posted on 06/20/2004 10:53:48 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Do you happen to know which nations beside the UK will have referendums on ratifying the EU Constitution?


2 posted on 06/20/2004 10:58:01 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
EU law is supreme, not just over parliamentary statutes, but also over national constitutions.

The US new world order types have pulled the same trick here with Treaty law and NAFTA ect. Good luck to ya.

3 posted on 06/20/2004 11:01:30 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Euroland is a sort of European America... birthed by bureaucrats instead of by patriots.


4 posted on 06/20/2004 11:02:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Until now, the EU has been an association of states, deriving its authority from international treaties. Henceforth, it will be a state in its own right, drawing legitimacy from the constitution.
___________________________________________________________

Well in the UN Security Council no state has more than one vote. Two EU members are permanent members now and others are on it from time to time. This would have to stop. France as a member of the EU is no more important the California, Texas or Florida. So the Security Council seat of any members EU members that end up in this single country would be consolidated into one that belongs to the EU.


5 posted on 06/20/2004 11:04:22 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Abolish the French and U.K seats and create one seat for Euroland and one each for India, Brazil, and South Africa.


6 posted on 06/20/2004 11:08:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Ireland and Denmark are required by law to hold referendum.

Czech republic have said they will. I think the same is true for Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain and probably the Netherlands.

We are fighting to get a referendum i Sweden (against the defiance of all the major political parties) . If Spain votes it is possible that Portugal will too.

The two countries that really are interesting are France and Poland. Poland because you would almost certainly get a no, and France as one of the founding members, where a yes is no certainty. In France there will be a lot of political skull-drudgery regarding referendum or not. This will have more to do with positioning in front of the upcoming presidential elections, than for or against the EU.

I will keep the forum updated.

ScaniaBoy
7 posted on 06/20/2004 11:09:34 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; JLS

If more nations are given permanent seats on the Security Council, you can bet your buns Japan will be one of them.


8 posted on 06/20/2004 11:09:59 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Much thanks. I've been wondering which ones they are because it'll make a huge difference.


9 posted on 06/20/2004 11:11:06 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Yes, that is what the eurocrats are striving for. They want a EU diplomatic corps that will supercede the national diplomats.

However, this diplomatic corps will be francophone, run by europhiles and francophiles. US will not gain a friend, but lose an ally (UK).

ScaniaBoy


10 posted on 06/20/2004 11:14:13 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Thanks, we will fight the good fight - and dammit we will win!.


11 posted on 06/20/2004 11:16:28 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

333 pages of constitutionsl confusion.

If there is one "voice for the EU" then there should be one EU seat on the securiy counsel.

The document is intentionally poorly written to justify whatever position is demanded.

France never wants to have another iraq situation where they will not be in a position to push other nations around. Next time France says sit down and shut up, they will chrry pick the term that give them the force of EUconsiutiona law.


12 posted on 06/20/2004 11:20:15 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

There was an article in today's Financial Times where it was stated that a no in countries like the UK or the Scandinavian countries won't have the same importance as a no in France.

Some pigs are more equal then other pigs!


13 posted on 06/20/2004 11:21:08 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Socialism in two letters = EU


14 posted on 06/20/2004 11:22:30 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
Sorry, it takes 4 letters:

ESSR

Good luck in your endeavours!

15 posted on 06/20/2004 11:26:18 PM PDT by SAJ (Buy 2 NGG05 8.50 calls, Sell 5 NGG05 12.00 calls against, for $1.000 net credit OB. Mortal lock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Hey, I have another question while I'm thinking about it. What would you say the odds are for Norway, Switzerland, or Iceland to join the EU in the next 10 years or so? How likely do you think it is for any of them and is there talk that you know of to hold referendums any time soon?

OK, one last question: Do you think Turkey will ever be allowed to join?


16 posted on 06/20/2004 11:26:24 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Norway: most political parties are for joining, but there are some who are against. There is a slight majority against among the voters. Two things make it unlikely that the Norwegians will join shortly: 1) In 2005 it will be hundred years since Norway broke away from the Swedish/Norwegian union and became independent. Not a good timing for a referendum to join EU. 2) Norway have voted twice on this issue and both times major political parties have incurred losses that remained for years. They will be very careful indeed.

Switzerland: Again the political elite is doing its best to get the Swiss to join. However, the recent elections showed that the Swiss aren't keen, and they voted a staunchly anti-EU party into power. There is a split between the French and German parts of Switzerland, but recently it has been a no majority in almost all parts. Also, due to the federal nature of Switzerland it will be difficult to get a yes. It will need not only a majority of the national vote, but also a plurality of the cantons (states). I don't think there is any likelihood for a (new) Swiss referendum within the next 5 years.

Iceland: I don't know. Presently Iceland is doing great economically. Will they really throw it all away so that Sapnish fishermen can get into their fishing waters?


17 posted on 06/20/2004 11:38:28 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
Sorry, forgot about Turkey.

I don't know. There are many reasons why they shouldn't. However, the "imperialism" among the eurocrats may just be a stronger impulse. To let Europe have a border on the Tigris and Euphrates - wouldn't that be lovely?

(I'm sorry to sound facetious, but this is the type of arguments that are driving these people...)
18 posted on 06/20/2004 11:41:36 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
I will keep the forum updated.

Very informative post.

A 333 page Constitution is a monstrosity! The citizens of European countries need to stop it cold.

19 posted on 06/21/2004 12:04:20 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Euroland: No God, no guns and no individuals.


20 posted on 06/21/2004 12:12:25 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson