Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Carolina US Senate Republican Primary update thread

Posted on 06/22/2004 4:55:29 PM PDT by conservative_2001

DeMint 549 70%

Beasley 232 30%

http://www.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/scsec/2004/ret2004run

If there's other returns sites please list!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: beasley; demint; electionussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2004 4:55:30 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001

DeMint 627 55%
Beasley 505 45%


2 posted on 06/22/2004 4:58:14 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001

DeMint got my vote today; I think he's got Beasley beat by a mile.


3 posted on 06/22/2004 4:58:15 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salo; SC MOOSE; doosee; JohnnyZ; Clintonfatigued; William Creel; Theodore R.; KQQL; ...

Good evening everyone. Tonight's party has begun!


4 posted on 06/22/2004 4:58:28 PM PDT by Kuksool (Get your souls to the polls in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I sure hope you're right. I saw a SurveyUSA poll that has DeMint up 54-44%. Let's hope it's accurate. We need to win this seat. We can't afford to run a proven loser.

Go DeMint!


5 posted on 06/22/2004 5:00:04 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

As is usually the case, other sources are far ahead of the state's official website.

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/

DeMint - 12,194 59%
Beasley - 8,309 41%


6 posted on 06/22/2004 5:02:29 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
It won't be the same without him in the Senate.


7 posted on 06/22/2004 5:06:46 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
GOP State Senate results


District 3
1 of 39 precincts - 3 percent 
Kevin L. Bryant, GOP 9 - 82 percent 
Chuck Allen, GOP 2 - 18 percent 

District 38 
5 of 30 precincts - 17 percent 
Randy Scott, GOP 1,010 - 70 percent 
Bill Branton, GOP (i) 429 - 30 percent 

District 43 
13 of 56 precincts - 23 percent 
Chip Campsen, GOP 762 - 56 percent 
John Kuhn, GOP (i) 591 - 44 percent 

Can someone fill in who we're rooting for here?

8 posted on 06/22/2004 5:07:52 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Beasley - 19,037 41%
DeMint - 24,867 59%

461 of 2,002 precincts reporting


9 posted on 06/22/2004 5:08:29 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001

South Carolina Election Returns
JUNE 22, 2004 STATEWIDE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY RUN OFF UNOFFICIAL RESULTS
U S SENATE
DAVID JIM
BEASLEY DEMINT
REPUBLICAN REPUBLICAN
ABBEVILLE 383 47.05% 431 52.95%
AIKEN 0 -- 0 --
ALLENDALE 0 -- 0 --
ANDERSON 0 -- 0 --
BAMBERG 137 39.26% 212 60.74%
BARNWELL 0 -- 0 --
BEAUFORT 0 -- 0 --
BERKELEY 0 -- 0 --
CALHOUN 138 41.82% 192 58.18%
CHARLESTON 0 -- 0 --
CHEROKEE 0 -- 0 --
CHESTER 0 -- 0 --
CHESTERFIELD 0 -- 0 --
CLARENDON 0 -- 0 --
COLLETON 0 -- 0 --
DARLINGTON 0 -- 0 --
DILLON 273 77.78% 78 22.22%
DORCHESTER 0 -- 0 --
EDGEFIELD 0 -- 0 --
FAIRFIELD 0 -- 0 --
FLORENCE 0 -- 0 --
GEORGETOWN 1,232 44.49% 1,537 55.51%
GREENVILLE 0 -- 0 --
GREENWOOD 0 -- 0 --
HAMPTON 38 33.63% 75 66.37%
HORRY 0 -- 0 --
JASPER 0 -- 0 --
KERSHAW 0 -- 0 --
LANCASTER 334 53.10% 295 46.90%
LAURENS 0 -- 0 --
LEE 0 -- 0 --
LEXINGTON 0 -- 0 --
MCCORMICK 94 20.84% 357 79.16%
MARION 0 -- 0 --
MARLBORO 79 73.83% 28 26.17%
NEWBERRY 784 38.54% 1,250 61.46%
OCONEE 0 -- 0 --
ORANGEBURG 0 -- 0 --
PICKENS 0 -- 0 --
RICHLAND 0 -- 0 --
SALUDA 0 -- 0 --
SPARTANBURG 0 -- 0 --
SUMTER 0 -- 0 --
UNION 0 -- 0 --
WILLIAMSBURG 0 -- 0 --
YORK 0 -- 0 --
STATE TOTAL 3,492 43.94% 4,455 56.06%


10 posted on 06/22/2004 5:19:19 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001

Beasley 49,953 42%
DeMint 69,890 58%
1,120 of 2,002 precincts reporting


11 posted on 06/22/2004 5:19:36 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Kerry, you have low poll numbers but I have good news. I just saved hundreds by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief



U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate - 68%; 1,363 of 2,002 precincts reporting
GOP Runoff
Name Party Votes Pct
Jim DeMint GOP 88,543 58.6%
David Beasley GOP 62,583 41.4%



12 posted on 06/22/2004 5:22:02 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

GOP SENATE RESULTS


Candidate Votes %

Beasley 62,583 41

DeMint 88,543 59

1,363 of 2,002 precincts reporting


13 posted on 06/22/2004 5:22:13 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
Top photo
Top photo
GOP SENATE RESULTS

Candidate Votes %
Beasley 49,953 42
DeMint 69,890 58
1,120 of 2,002 precincts reporting

» GOP State Senate results
» State House results

14 posted on 06/22/2004 5:22:52 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (It's been a jihad for 1200 years...so whats new?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

Why does that picture of Beasley remind me of William Shatner?


15 posted on 06/22/2004 5:25:28 PM PDT by GiveEmDubya (We Need a New Reagan Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GiveEmDubya

Maybe the hair?


16 posted on 06/22/2004 5:28:08 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Kerry, you have low poll numbers but I have good news. I just saved hundreds by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
U.S. Senate

U.S. Senate - 68%; 1,363 of 2,002 precincts reporting

GOP Runoff

Name Party Votes Pct

Jim DeMint GOP 88,543 58.6%
David Beasley GOP 62,583 41.4%

17 posted on 06/22/2004 5:29:23 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (Past performance is no guarantee of future results... I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina



U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate - 78%; 1,570 of 2,002 precincts reporting
GOP Runoff
Name Party Votes Pct
Jim DeMint GOP 109,675 59.4%
David Beasley GOP 74,994 40.6%



18 posted on 06/22/2004 5:30:08 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

GO JIM GO!!!!!!


19 posted on 06/22/2004 5:30:31 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

So far it's looking like a strong win for DeMint that'll give him momentum as he starts in on the general election campaign.


20 posted on 06/22/2004 5:32:51 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SC_Republican

Did Beasley add anything to his column since the first primary? I thought he only got around 40% the first time. It looks like a lot of SC Republicans defintely were NOT keen on another Beasley run.


21 posted on 06/22/2004 5:35:55 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Kerry, you have low poll numbers but I have good news. I just saved hundreds by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

No, there was not a lot of excitment for him. He got the 40% on name recognition only.


22 posted on 06/22/2004 5:37:04 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SC_Republican

he only got 37% before.


23 posted on 06/22/2004 5:41:12 PM PDT by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GOP

Wow! This is great. DeMint is winning by more than I thought he would. As another poster said, this gives him great momentum heading into November.

Beasley ended up working out well for us. His entry into the race made this race look tighter than it turned out to be. This gave DeMint a ton of free publicity he otherwise may not have gotten, and as an added boost, he's seen as the man who put down Beasley.

All the while getting the nominee we wanted all along. I'm very optimistic we're going to win this seat. Go DeMint!


24 posted on 06/22/2004 5:41:40 PM PDT by conservative_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SC_Republican


Just like the old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate - 83%; 1,666 of 2,002 precincts reporting
GOP Runoff
Name Party Votes Pct
Jim DeMint GOP 115,500 59.6%
David Beasley GOP 78,416 40.4%


25 posted on 06/22/2004 5:41:53 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; Torie; ambrose

@


26 posted on 06/22/2004 5:42:47 PM PDT by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GOP

yup...never liked Beasley that much as governor....he always seemed smarmy to me.


27 posted on 06/22/2004 5:44:02 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KQQL

SurveyUSA was off on this one.


28 posted on 06/22/2004 5:46:36 PM PDT by ambrose ("Wearing Religion on Your Sleeve," DemoRat Style: http://tinyurl.com/yvvmz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GiveEmDubya

HA HA HA....upon closer inspection it sure does.....good observation


29 posted on 06/22/2004 5:47:33 PM PDT by ThreePuttinDude (It's been a jihad for 1200 years...so whats new?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001
Associated Press calls it for DeMint.
30 posted on 06/22/2004 5:48:06 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (Past performance is no guarantee of future results... I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
From what I have heard, the campaigns and the PACs were all polling this race and all had it between 10-12 points.

If the margin ends up being around 20, then everyone missed how well DeMint would do.

31 posted on 06/22/2004 5:51:10 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SC_Republican

Any opinions on the state senate and house runoffs? Anyone?


32 posted on 06/22/2004 5:53:03 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001

DeMint wins GOP Senate runoff

By JENNIFER HOLLAND

Associated Press Writer


COLUMBIA - South Carolina Congressman Jim DeMint claimed the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate on Tuesday after he pushed former Gov. David Beasley out of the race in what was expected to be a tight runoff.

Voters who returned the polls picked DeMint, a relative unknown in much of the state a few months ago, 59 percent to 41 percent over Beasley in unofficial results with 82 percent of the precincts reporting.


DeMint, who's spent about $3.5 million so far, will face Democrat Inez Tenenbaum this fall for the seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, who has held his seat for nearly 40 years.


Beasley and DeMint had been in a fierce battle since they emerged from the six-way June 8 primary as the top vote-getters. Since neither got more than 50 percent, a runoff was scheduled and the candidates dashed out of the gate to grab every vote.


Political observers said voter turnout was the key, especially in the Lowcountry, which was up for grabs. The two former GOP Senate candidates from that area endorsed DeMint, who is from Greenville.


33 posted on 06/22/2004 5:59:34 PM PDT by AmericaUnited (It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

There's too much consumin' goin' on out there!


34 posted on 06/22/2004 6:00:42 PM PDT by Law is not justice but process
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process

U.S. Senate
U.S. Senate - 92%; 1,861 of 2,002 precincts reporting
GOP Runoff
Name Party Votes Pct
Jim DeMint GOP 135,131 59.3%
David Beasley GOP 92,612 40.7%


35 posted on 06/22/2004 6:01:12 PM PDT by GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process

ROFL. Exactly.


36 posted on 06/22/2004 6:04:21 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Inez willget a ton of cash, from allover, as the Dems pull out all the stops..will the $$$ DeMont was forced to spend in the primary put him at a disadvantage?..will he be able to raise what he needs?


37 posted on 06/22/2004 6:05:57 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

SurveyUSA was off?

First off, Senate and Gubernatorial polls are not very accurate for any polling company, because it's nearly impossible to judge the turnout because of so many different variables.


38 posted on 06/22/2004 6:06:52 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

They nailed the PA primary.


39 posted on 06/22/2004 6:09:22 PM PDT by ambrose ("Wearing Religion on Your Sleeve," DemoRat Style: http://tinyurl.com/yvvmz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dales


The polls showed Demint by 10, with major momentum.. Why is it suprising he won by 19?

The SurveyUSA poll was as accurate as possible for a race such as this. It was down between 6-18 and 6-20, 2 days before the election, with Demint adding new voters every day, and Beasley supporters seeing that their effort was futile.

Why is everyone so quick to jump on the polls in such a race?


40 posted on 06/22/2004 6:10:57 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GOP
That pretty much does it for Beasley, I'd say. If he launches anymore political comebacks it will be as a State House Representative from Society Hill.

I haven't seen a whuppin' like that since the Clemson-Carolina game.

I feel a little bit bad for Beasley though. If he had stuck to his principles instead of selling out to try to win votes he would have beat Hodges and the Legislature would have moved the flag and forced a vote on the lottery on their own. Because of his flip-flops I now don't trust him farther than I can throw a mule, but he isn't such a bad guy. He's just a lousy politician.
41 posted on 06/22/2004 6:13:20 PM PDT by Law is not justice but process
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process
That pretty much does it for Beasley, I'd say. If he launches anymore political comebacks

Never say never. Have you ever heard of Joe Brennan?

42 posted on 06/22/2004 6:17:16 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Yes, I do think I'm funny, why do you ask?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA
I was not being critical.

Stating the fact that no poll nailed the margin is not the same as saying any poll should have nailed the margin.

43 posted on 06/22/2004 6:17:37 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Law is not justice but process
I like how the Dems wanted Beasley against Inez in November. I loved the message at our poll that if you voted in the Democrat Primary, you can't vote in the runoff. The only crossovers allowed were ones who voted Republican or didn't vote in the primary. But they're not that motivated when it comes to getting people to do something twice.
44 posted on 06/22/2004 6:20:22 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GOP; Kuksool; AuH2ORepublican; William Creel; KQQL; Impy; goldstategop; ...

Nothing in this race has gone well. It would seem illogical that a pro-abort woman could win this race. But a while back, it seemed illogical that a leftist African-American with an Islamic-sounding name could be elected Senator of Illinois. We all know how that race is going. On the bright side, chances are that Inez Tennenbaum will be in the minority when she's sworn in as Senator. In any event, she'll have to make some concessions to conservatives to stay out of political danger. Oh, well, that's politics.


45 posted on 06/22/2004 6:32:37 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Nothing in this race has gone well.

soooo...I take it that you wanted Beasley to win?

46 posted on 06/22/2004 6:34:35 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: conservative_2001; All

I'm glad to see DeMint win...although I have to admit that I wasn't against Beasley's trade policies.

My big concern is how much Inez Tenenbaum is gonna milk the protectionism issue in the general election. I'm thinking her and the national party will use this issue big time.

I can already see the ads...black and white...pictures of closed textile mills...workers (of all colors...remember its a Dem ad...all races have to be equally featured)looking somewhere between weary and wary...

My question is this:

How does DeMint go on the offense over this issue? I think he has to use the inoculation route, meaning that he has to get out ahead of the situation and state the reasons why he's for free trade and why free trade is good for the Palmetto State.


47 posted on 06/22/2004 6:35:22 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
I've got 4 letters for ya....B.U.S.H.

his coattails alone should push us over the top.

48 posted on 06/22/2004 6:37:03 PM PDT by SC_Republican (unfortunately my first name is Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

While Rep. DeMint will not have an easy election, why do you think Inez Tennenbaum will win the election?


49 posted on 06/22/2004 6:39:08 PM PDT by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
What's up with that post? Did your enthusiasm for limited government get outsourced too? Or perhaps you're upset that you'll no longer be able to vote for a Democrat senate candidate that just happened to have an "R" by his name. Wipe your nose and the tears then shut up and hold your nose in November if you must.
50 posted on 06/22/2004 6:41:56 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (#40 ARZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson