Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WMD BREAKING: Dulfer confirms at least 1 dozen sarin shells found in Iraq to date!
FOX Radio News / KCBQ ^ | 6/24/04 | Charles Dulfter

Posted on 06/24/2004 1:04:14 PM PDT by Steven W.

Charles Dulfer, head of Iraqi WMD survey group, confirms a number of additional Sarin gas weapons have been found in Iraq.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 155mm; binaryshell; daschele; iraq; isg; sad; sarin; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-312 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2004 1:04:15 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Let's hope this gets confirmed.


2 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:15 PM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Start cookin' the crow...


3 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:17 PM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

This will not bode well for Kerry and company.


4 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:33 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

!


5 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:38 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

6 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:55 PM PDT by Petronski (Ronald Reagan: 1015 electoral votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Ooooooooooohhhhhh -- and just in time for the Democrat convention. I love it when a plan comes together. ;-)
7 posted on 06/24/2004 1:05:57 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Nah, they're too old. Anything that dates to before '91 the media doens't consider WMD. Even a Nuke.


8 posted on 06/24/2004 1:06:32 PM PDT by traviskicks (The private sector ALWAYS outperforms government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

I just heard Dulfer (himself) explaining


9 posted on 06/24/2004 1:06:35 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Lefties, you know the drill:

"old"

"left-over"

10 posted on 06/24/2004 1:06:50 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

"This will not bode well for Kerry and company."

Why? It's not like they'll accept it.


11 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Question: Isn't it spelled "Dulfour"?


12 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:17 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

One problem - are they going to say "Oh but this was from the Iran-Iraq war?" If that's the case the media will toss this away.


13 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:20 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

14 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:26 PM PDT by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Tom Daschle is deeply saddened...er.


15 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:30 PM PDT by ICX ("My Life" was Clinton's second choice title, after "I Am God, and You Are All My Subjects." - AC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Remember - the shell that was previously found as an IED was one of the modern "mixer" variety that were not known to be in Saddam's posession prior to 1996.


16 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:31 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
Let's hope this gets confirmed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it has been confirmed - by Charles Dulfer, head of Iraqi WMD survey group.

17 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:36 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
You must be assuming that Bagdad Dan will let this information see the light of day!

Pray for W and Our Outstanding Troops

18 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:44 PM PDT by bray (Let's win one more for the Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Please please please...let it be true.

I'd love to stuff the news down a few DemoRAT throats.


19 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:55 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

it may be (spelled Dulfour)


20 posted on 06/24/2004 1:07:56 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile.

-PJ

21 posted on 06/24/2004 1:08:11 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Next up: hotel receipts of Mr. O. Bin Laden at the Baghadad Hilton and home movies of him poolside, from July 2001.

Shall we start a pool? About mid October sounds good to me.


22 posted on 06/24/2004 1:08:29 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICX

23 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:00 PM PDT by The G Man (John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

BUT will the liberal media REPORT IT?

IF they do, will it be a tiny paragrah in the back of the paper?


24 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:02 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Cant be...Daschele told me there werent any...


25 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:04 PM PDT by treeclimber ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.



We won't hear about it on the evening news.

Instead we'll hear about Smith's Bicycle Center in Toledo, Ohio has laid off 5 workers today


26 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:26 PM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

The administration should have never allowed them to frame the debate that way.


27 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:27 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

What does "to date" mean? It sounds to me like that means we have been finding them here and there for a while but other than the one on the side of the road, it hasn't been publically announced. That is a much different situation than if we just stumbled across 12 of these today.

Clarify?


28 posted on 06/24/2004 1:09:38 PM PDT by Pete (Clinton was and continues to be a sociopath. http://www.home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/socio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Plus, it has to be stamped "Grade A Sarin" by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.


29 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:14 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

They'll just say we gave them to Saddam in the 1980's.


30 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:23 PM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

Add: not a stockpile.


31 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:28 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Great news, but they could find a THOUSAND dozen and it would never convince the Kool-Aid drinkers.


32 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:32 PM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

it will not matter, unless Bush goes to a microphone and asserts the WMD claim - this story will simply be written off as "old shells leftover from the Iran/Iraq war". we all know the spin.


33 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:33 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Correct. Saddam in possession of WMDs produced BEFORE 1991 is apparently not a threat to the US or the region. I fail to understand the logic of that argument, but what do I know?


34 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:52 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well.....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

It is going to be funny watching all the Dems do the Washington crab-walk on the "NO WMD DEBATE".


35 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:53 PM PDT by kimoajax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Hands Bliss still can't find them....


36 posted on 06/24/2004 1:10:57 PM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
"And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile."

LOL Unfortunately, probably true. It's like they won't accept the oil-for-food scandal is real unless they kind a pile of cartoon-like moneybags with dollar signs on the side.
37 posted on 06/24/2004 1:11:12 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
At a guess, I'd say the "they were planted" stories that have been on ice for a year and a half are being dusted off at the NY Times...
38 posted on 06/24/2004 1:11:25 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

It may be confirmed, but the media will never carry it.


39 posted on 06/24/2004 1:11:25 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
Anything that dates to before '91 the media doens't consider WMD. Even a Nuke.

LOL!

The news media are so predictable.

40 posted on 06/24/2004 1:11:27 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Sen. Kerry's response: Yeah, but they are not quality WMDs.
41 posted on 06/24/2004 1:12:52 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Sarin? Move along, WMD lite, nothing to see. Wake me when its nukes or anthrax.

/sarcasm.


42 posted on 06/24/2004 1:12:54 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

BUT will the liberal media REPORT IT?

No.

IF they do, will it be a tiny paragrah in the back of the paper?

It'll be on Page G24, lower-left hand corner, in with the classified ads...

43 posted on 06/24/2004 1:13:05 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pete

what he said was that they are / have been continuing to find them since the first shell was discovered & then indicated there were at least a dozen found thus far.


44 posted on 06/24/2004 1:13:10 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

He couldn't find his Hans with his Blix.


45 posted on 06/24/2004 1:13:42 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Exactly.


46 posted on 06/24/2004 1:13:45 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

True, but God forbid if the Kool-Aid drinkers constitute enough people to elect a President. This may have no sway with the media, or the hardened Bush haters, but with MOST Americans, Saddam in possession of any WMDs, in violation of UN resolutions, bolsters Bush's policy, and enhances his chances for re-election.


47 posted on 06/24/2004 1:14:16 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well.....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Bush should have them shipped into Detroits Convention Hall next month. But he won't.


48 posted on 06/24/2004 1:15:24 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Quick. Someone tell the NY Times to save a paragraph on page 17A.


49 posted on 06/24/2004 1:15:32 PM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile.

All you need do is put panties on the tip of one shell, have a dog bark at a second, and have a cigarette-smoking female MP laugh at a third shell, and then the shells can be said to have been tortured by the United States.

Then the DemWits can try and turn this into a scandal for the Bush administration.

Y'see.

50 posted on 06/24/2004 1:16:08 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson