WMD BREAKING: Dulfer confirms at least 1 dozen sarin shells found in Iraq to date!

FOX Radio News / KCBQ ^ | 6/24/04 | Charles Dulfter

[Steven W.]

Charles Dulfer, head of Iraqi WMD survey group, confirms a number of additional Sarin gas weapons have been found in Iraq.

[ChuckShick]

Let's hope this gets confirmed.

[dirtboy]

Start cookin' the crow...

[sarasota]

This will not bode well for Kerry and company.

[Frank_Discussion]

!

[Petronski]

[r9etb]

Ooooooooooohhhhhh -- and just in time for the Democrat convention. I love it when a plan comes together. ;-)

[traviskicks]

Nah, they're too old. Anything that dates to before '91 the media doens't consider WMD. Even a Nuke.

[Steven W.]

I just heard Dulfer (himself) explaining

[Dr. Frank fan]

Lefties, you know the drill:

"old"

"left-over"

[cripplecreek]

"This will not bode well for Kerry and company."

Why? It's not like they'll accept it.

[Steve_Seattle]

Question: Isn't it spelled "Dulfour"?

[areafiftyone]

One problem - are they going to say "Oh but this was from the Iran-Iraq war?" If that's the case the media will toss this away.

[The G Man]

[ICX]

Tom Daschle is deeply saddened...er.

[Steven W.]

Remember - the shell that was previously found as an IED was one of the modern "mixer" variety that were not known to be in Saddam's posession prior to 1996.

[Dr. Frank fan]

Let's hope this gets confirmed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it has been confirmed - by Charles Dulfer, head of Iraqi WMD survey group.

[bray]

You must be assuming that Bagdad Dan will let this information see the light of day!

Pray for W and Our Outstanding Troops

[BushisTheMan]

Please please please...let it be true.

I'd love to stuff the news down a few DemoRAT throats.

[Steven W.]

it may be (spelled Dulfour)

[Political Junkie Too]

And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile.

-PJ

[ElkGroveDan]

Next up: hotel receipts of Mr. O. Bin Laden at the Baghadad Hilton and home movies of him poolside, from July 2001.

Shall we start a pool? About mid October sounds good to me.

[The G Man]

[nmh]

BUT will the liberal media REPORT IT?

IF they do, will it be a tiny paragrah in the back of the paper?

[treeclimber]

Cant be...Daschele told me there werent any...

[Josh in PA]

We won't hear about it on the evening news.

Instead we'll hear about Smith's Bicycle Center in Toledo, Ohio has laid off 5 workers today

[plain talk]

The administration should have never allowed them to frame the debate that way.

[Pete]

What does "to date" mean? It sounds to me like that means we have been finding them here and there for a while but other than the one on the side of the road, it hasn't been publically announced. That is a much different situation than if we just stumbled across 12 of these today.

Clarify?

[Larry Lucido]

Plus, it has to be stamped "Grade A Sarin" by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.

[ChuckShick]

They'll just say we gave them to Saddam in the 1980's.

[RightWhale]

Add: not a stockpile.

[Constitution Day]

Great news, but they could find a THOUSAND dozen and it would never convince the Kool-Aid drinkers.

[oceanview]

it will not matter, unless Bush goes to a microphone and asserts the WMD claim - this story will simply be written off as "old shells leftover from the Iran/Iraq war". we all know the spin.

[My2Cents]

Correct. Saddam in possession of WMDs produced BEFORE 1991 is apparently not a threat to the US or the region. I fail to understand the logic of that argument, but what do I know?

[kimoajax]

It is going to be funny watching all the Dems do the Washington crab-walk on the "NO WMD DEBATE".

[azhenfud]

Hands Bliss still can't find them....

[Steve_Seattle]

"And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile."

LOL Unfortunately, probably true. It's like they won't accept the oil-for-food scandal is real unless they kind a pile of cartoon-like moneybags with dollar signs on the side.

[Billthedrill]

At a guess, I'd say the "they were planted" stories that have been on ice for a year and a half are being dusted off at the NY Times...

[freeangel]

It may be confirmed, but the media will never carry it.

[george wythe]

Anything that dates to before '91 the media doens't consider WMD. Even a Nuke.

LOL!

The news media are so predictable.

[McGruff]

Sen. Kerry's response: Yeah, but they are not quality WMDs.

[Rebelbase]

Sarin? Move along, WMD lite, nothing to see. Wake me when its nukes or anthrax.

/sarcasm.

[Chemist_Geek]

BUT will the liberal media REPORT IT?

No.

IF they do, will it be a tiny paragrah in the back of the paper?

It'll be on Page G24, lower-left hand corner, in with the classified ads...

[Steven W.]

what he said was that they are / have been continuing to find them since the first shell was discovered & then indicated there were at least a dozen found thus far.

[Williams]

He couldn't find his Hans with his Blix.

[areafiftyone]

Exactly.

[My2Cents]

True, but God forbid if the Kool-Aid drinkers constitute enough people to elect a President. This may have no sway with the media, or the hardened Bush haters, but with MOST Americans, Saddam in possession of any WMDs, in violation of UN resolutions, bolsters Bush's policy, and enhances his chances for re-election.

[gathersnomoss]

Bush should have them shipped into Detroits Convention Hall next month. But he won't.

[I still care]

Quick. Someone tell the NY Times to save a paragraph on page 17A.

[Lazamataz]

And if they're not neatly stacked in the proper pyramid shape, to government specifications, then they are not a stockpile.

All you need do is put panties on the tip of one shell, have a dog bark at a second, and have a cigarette-smoking female MP laugh at a third shell, and then the shells can be said to have been tortured by the United States.

Then the DemWits can try and turn this into a scandal for the Bush administration.

Y'see.