Friday. Re: surgery. I'm making the doctor appt. ;-)
Posted on 06/29/2004 12:36:24 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
When the film The Stepford Wives was released in 1975, it hit a cultural nerve. The premise was a silly one: that is, that men want brainless slaves for wives and would kill to get them. But people responded to the film and the term Stepford wife has become a permanent part of our cultural vocabulary. The movie, a horror film, tapped into the paranoia that even then was an integral part of the feminist movement.
The newly released remake of The Stepford Wives is, by contrast, nothing but a reflection of the gender-related confusion that’s taken over our culture after several decades of radical feminism.
Instead of a horror film, the new Stepford Wives is a comedy about Joanna Eberhart, a network president who specializes in sordid reality shows. After being shot at by a contestant, the supposedly tough Joanna has a nervous breakdown, gets fired, and moves to Stepford, Connecticut, with her family. There, as in the original film, she finds a town full of bland, boring women with few interests outside of housework and home decorating.
Unlike her predecessor, however, this Joanna goes through a major identity crisis. Realizing that her new life might be a chance to reconnect with her family, she tries to turn herself into a fanatical homemaker, putting a bow in her hair and baking enough cupcakes to feed all of Connecticut. When that doesn’t work out, she begins to suspect that her husband wants to change her even more. He wants her to become a full-fledged Stepford wife—her wifely behavior controlled by a computer chip implanted in her brain—just like her neighbors.
What people tend to forget is that the heroine of the original Stepford Wives, a feminist and a “semi-professional photographer,” was also a stay-at-home mom—and that was okay. In the remake, staying at home is automatically identified with Stepfordism. Joanna discovers that all of the women in Stepford used to be high-powered executives until their brains were taken over, forcing them to stay home.
Yes, the movie is a comedy, but there’s a disturbing idea behind it: that is, that there’s no middle ground between being a career woman and being a semi-robotic, brainless Stepford wife. It’s disturbing because it echoes an attitude that’s more and more prevalent among the elites of our society. Reviewer Desson Thomson demonstrated this attitude beautifully when he wrote in the Washington Post, “[Stepford wives] defer like slaves to their husbands. These women make hot muffins, take care of the kids, and obsess about cleaning house.” I have to wonder, since when is baking or taking care of the kids on a par with slavery and obsession? (And incidentally, why is taking care of kids a worse option than producing lurid reality TV shows?)
Even when they’re meant to be taken lightly and, like this one, when they’re poorly made, most movies tell us something about the state of our culture. In this case, it’s about how our culture views marriage. If marriage is seen as oppressive and mocked, it’s just that much easier to redefine it as we see fit—a prospect before us today and far more frightening than The Stepford Wives.
If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Good article.
If you think about it, even career women have to clean up the house and take of their children after work.
;-)
Congratulations!
TS
No, they pay maids and nannies to do that. I've known quite a few who couldn't find the "On" switch on a vacuum cleaner.
The original novel, by John Wyndham, was a classic.
I love those women, I gotta get me one of those girls!
I never understood how either movie could turn them into robots. I never got that from the book.
Hmmm! I keep reading in the Women's magazines about balancing home and career. They are never really directed at stay-at-home moms, more career women. Someone must inform them. LOL!
I was just thinking of the Stepford Husbands thing. My best friend works while her husband takes care of the house and homeschools their son. It's a benefit for all of them.
"Mr. Ferretti is an engineer...of CompuTech Corp...Mr. Sumner holds patents in dyes and plastics...doing research in vinyl polymers...Mr. Duwicki...is in microcircuitry...Mr. Sundersen designs optical sensors..."
The heroine, Joanna, knows that her friend Bobbie would bleed when cut, and Bobbie didn't. Dale had worked on robots at Disneyland.
Etc. :-)
This movie is even worse (the 2004 version).
The producers/directors apparently started out saying they were robots then changed their minds to women with chips in their heads, so they ended up doing some really poor editing to go back to the women with chips in their heads.
One of the most poorly edited movies I've ever seen.
My maiden name is Eberhardt. Never hear it in the movies... but I don't think I'll go to this one - hearing the name in a theater isn't worth $7.50 and 2 wasted hours.
Friday. Re: surgery. I'm making the doctor appt. ;-)
Oh stop it! She likes being dragged around by the hair.
"I thought you were my friend...I thought you were my friend..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.