Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

July 1 Marks Vast Improvements For Virginia Gun Laws
National Rifle Association ^

Posted on 07/04/2004 10:13:00 PM PDT by Stoat

FAIRFAX, VA -- Virginia Right-to-Carry permit holders are no longer subject to the state’s one-gun-a-month restriction, thanks to a law effective July 1. Fifteen additional pro-gun laws go on the books helping to improve the Second Amendment rights of Virginians. All new statutes -- supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) -- were passed by the Virginia General Assembly and signed by Governor Mark Warner.

"This has been a landmark year for the Second Amendment in the Commonwealth of Virginia," said Chris W. Cox, NRA’s chief lobbyist. "Today Virginia’s law-abiding gun owners have more rights after strong support from the Virginia General Assembly, Governor Warner and citizens across the state."

One positive change to Virginia statute excludes holders of valid Right-to-Carry permits from the limitation of buying only one handgun a month. The law, originally sponsored by Delegate Bill Janis (HB 404), also exempts purchases made by collectors for the purposes of improving their collection.

Other measures, sponsored respectively by Delegate Bob McDonnell and Delegate Scott Lingamfelter (HB 1144 and HB 1302), make needed improvements to the laws governing firearm purchases by removing unnecessary restrictions on residents of the Commonwealth. Four additional statutes strengthen preemption laws and eliminate onerous local firearm ordinances. And, Virginia broadly expanded the number of states whose Right-to-Carry permits it will recognize.

"Not only did 16 pro-gun bills become law, but numerous anti-gun proposals were soundly defeated this legislative session," added Cox. "NRA commends Virginia for taking a giant step forward in protecting our Second Amendment freedom."

Please visit http://nraila.com/CurrentLegislation/Read.aspx?ID=1068-L for a complete list of Virginia’s new firearm laws.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; ccw; guns; law; righttocarry; secondamendment; virginia

1 posted on 07/04/2004 10:13:01 PM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Click on image to join today!

2 posted on 07/04/2004 10:22:44 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list

Bang!


3 posted on 07/04/2004 10:23:23 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
The kind of news I like to see.
4 posted on 07/04/2004 10:28:09 PM PDT by Searching For Truth (Guns kill people, and paint causes graffiti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I may be late with this as I don't check the NRA site EVERY day (ashamed expression on face) but anyone who is a news junkie and checks lots of sites frequently to keep up on things might be interested in knowing that the NRA now has RSS newsfeeds. You can sign up for them here:

http://www.nraila.org/XML/Default.aspx#RSS

If you aren't familiar with RSS newsfeeds, it's a method of getting news headlines into your inbox (with an email client add-in) or in a 'frequently' free newsreader. It's really convenient because you can scan lots of headlines from numerous news sites in the time it would normally take to go to one web page.

For Outlook users, I'm using an add-in called Newsgator which works perfectly and I love to pieces. You can learn more about it here:

http://www.newsgator.com

If you don't use Outlook, a great FREE newsreader that I really like also is Newsdesk, which you can learn more about here:

http://www.wildgrape.net/

There are lots of other paid and free RSS newsreaders, and if you like to read a lot of news I'd recommend looking into it :-)


5 posted on 07/04/2004 10:39:06 PM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; iceskater; xyz123; Mudboy Slim; Corin Stormhands; jla; Flora McDonald; GeorgeW23225; ...

With the signing of this, Mark Whiner just launched his next campaign...is he running for Senate in 2006 or 2008?


6 posted on 07/05/2004 6:40:14 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I'm going on vacation in 25 days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I can't see, for the life of me, why anyone would need more than one gun a month, unless they were in the gun business. But, unlike the libs, I figure it's none of my business.


7 posted on 07/05/2004 6:54:11 AM PDT by JimRed (Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

No doubt he's running for Big Jawn's seat (which he expects to be vacant) in 2006.


8 posted on 07/05/2004 6:58:07 AM PDT by sultan88 ("I went down Virginia, seeking shelter from the storm...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sultan88

No, John Warner isn't up again until 2008. Allen is up in 2006.


9 posted on 07/05/2004 6:58:53 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I'm going on vacation in 25 days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"I can't see, for the life of me, why anyone would need more than one gun a month..."

There have been a number of occasions where I've felt I needed more than one gun per month. Especially when the prices are good!

Saying no one "needs" more than one gun per month is like saying no one really "needs" a four-bedroom, three-bath home on five acres of land.

10 posted on 07/05/2004 7:02:59 AM PDT by sultan88 ("I went down Virginia, seeking shelter from the storm...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
My bad!!! You are right. (I'm taking meds again!)

That means he's "gunning" for Allen's seat!

11 posted on 07/05/2004 7:04:49 AM PDT by sultan88 ("I went down Virginia, seeking shelter from the storm...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
I can't see, for the life of me, why anyone would need more than one gun a month, unless they were in the gun business. But, unlike the libs, I figure it's none of my business.

I think a lot of it applies to people who are collectors or who just go on periodic buying binges. It's very easy, for example, to go to a gun show and find more than one pistol that you would like to purchase. You may only do that once a year -- or even less often -- but the old rule would prevent you from doing that.

I used to be somewhat anti-gun, and as a slightly depressive alcoholic, I still don't want loaded firearms around my own house. But I have also decided that the only group of people who are affected by gun laws are those who are willing to obey laws in the first place.

Disarming those people -- or even restricting their purchases -- may save a life or two, but overall, it isn't a good public policy.

If you can figure out some way to get firearms (and especially narcotics) out of the hands of criminals, I'd be all for that.

12 posted on 07/05/2004 7:17:43 AM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Thank you for the ping!


13 posted on 07/05/2004 7:18:51 AM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"I can't see, for the life of me, why anyone would need more than one gun a month."

Ya gotta learn to think like an oppressive government for the answer to this. Before you know if somebody IS buying more than one gun a month, you have to know the exact extent of his "collection" all the way down to the type, model and serial number of each one in a national database. This is called registration. Speaking as a history teacher, I can tell you that "registration ALWAYS precedes confiscation." They couldn't care less if folks buy one gun a month or more. The goal is to find out who has what and where it is, so they can go pick them up. Mayor Dinkins of New York proved the concept when he registered all the "assault shotguns" right before he confiscated them or forced their removal. The same thing is proving to be the case in California. It was true in 1936 Germany. It was true in communist Russia (my dad saw it there). Heck in the times of Alexander the Great they had sword control! Even that is happening right now in Australia.

The bottom line is that if "they" want to restrict your RIGHT to own a firearm (any kind of non crew-served firearm, even a machinegun) they want your freedom. Freedom is distinguished from liberty in that "freedom" is the condition of being in a "nonSLAVE" situation as opposed to "liberty" which is being able to do as you please.

14 posted on 07/05/2004 8:55:13 AM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Wow. Thanks for posting this - I have a VA CCW.


15 posted on 07/05/2004 8:57:54 AM PDT by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
I can't see....

I imagine that there are a lot of things you do that I just can't see but that's not your problem is it?

16 posted on 07/05/2004 9:11:27 AM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

Re your post #9. Mark Warner played a BIG role in raising taxes unnecessarily in Virginia this year. Unless the votes of the liberals in northern Virginia (those suburbs which could be considered not a part of Virginia but an outpost for immigrants to the state who want to work for Uncle Sam and private companies supplying same) can overcome the votes of the rest of the state, Mark Warner has no prayer of becoming a senator...at least from Virginia.

His signing-off on gun laws is just a cover, easily recognizable as such.


17 posted on 07/05/2004 10:03:43 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum; Mudboy Slim; iceskater; sultan88
Re your post #9. Mark Warner played a BIG role in raising taxes unnecessarily in Virginia this year.

Oh hey, I know that well. I lived thru it. But Warner will continue to lie on his positions and distort the state finances to make himself look good. Don't get me wrong, I think (and pray) that Virginians will see thru this.

But he's gonna try.

18 posted on 07/05/2004 10:35:10 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I'm going on vacation in 25 days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum; Corin Stormhands
"His signing-off on gun laws is just a cover..."

Yep...Warner's a hardcore COMMIE...MUD

19 posted on 07/05/2004 11:39:32 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH the EX-Rapist-in-Chief!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

"I can't see, for the life of me, why anyone would need more than one gun a month, unless they were in the gun business. But, unlike the libs, I figure it's none of my business."

Perhaps it might help to look at it this way. Suppose I told you that you only 'needed' to be free to speak once a month? How about you only 'needed' to go to church once a month? The ability to purchase a gun is a right. Once a month gun limits are a form of rationing rights.


20 posted on 07/05/2004 11:53:45 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

That's easy. A couple years go a local sporting goods store ws going out of business. Within 2 weeks I bought a Beretta .40 and a Browning .22. Another example would be if somebody wants to buy a rifle and a pistol. Let's say you buy a revolver for persoal defense then see a nice OU shotgun on sale and wnt to buy it. The examples go on and on.


21 posted on 07/05/2004 11:54:42 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Finally some good new from the Virginia General Assembly.


22 posted on 07/05/2004 1:29:46 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
The one gun a month applies to any receipt of a handgun from a dealer (among other provisions). This also applies to repair work or pawn shop transactions (shipment back to the owner must occur through a dealer legally). So if I sent two of my guns to the factory or had to pawn them for extra cash. I would only be able to receive one every 30 days through the dealer (the only legal way to receive them). I would have to fill out the same paperwork, and go through the same background checks. All to pick up property that was legally mine to begin with. This is an example of how the government has gotten too big for its britches, trying to do things for "the common good."

C.S.Lewis put it properly when he wrote:

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their consciences."

23 posted on 07/05/2004 5:21:15 PM PDT by P8riot (A gun is just a substitute for a penis, so when attacked by a mugger one should pull out a..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Actually the NRA had very little, if anything, to do with Virginia's pro-gun legislation this year. Thanks go to the VCDL. All Virginia gun-owners should become members of the VCDL as well as NRA. We have been extremely active in promoting pro-gun legislation, and keeping the localities and politicians in line. If I had to chose one pro-gun organization it would be VCDL.
24 posted on 07/05/2004 5:26:51 PM PDT by P8riot (A gun is just a substitute for a penis, so when attacked by a mugger one should pull out a..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson