Posted on 07/07/2004 4:37:59 PM PDT by Grig
Oddly, maybe you don't consider "dope-smoking, gay-loving, gun-hating left-wing" name calling.
I didn't stutter. But go ahead and hit that abuse button right now, if you can't take the heat.
I didn't say you suttered. I pretty much said you don't have the courage to say exactly what it is you're trying to snidely imply. You're a coward.
I didn't call you a dope-smoking, gay-loving, gun-hating left-winger. I simply observed how your posting pattern coincides with that of a dope-smoking, gay-loving, gun-hating left-winger more closely than that of a real libertarian.
You claim to live in a right-to-carry state. I live in a state where some municipalities have actually outlawed handguns, and I think the absolute absence of any posts by you on gun control threads speaks volumes, despite your residence in a right-to-carry state.
Let the record reflect the identity of the person who actually started the name-calling on this thread.
You can complain if you feel injured. Go right ahead.
But I have to say, Bryan's posts are excellent and I agree with them.
The gay and bisexual community will be responsible for infecting innocents, once again through blood transfusions, where they are encouraged by the homosexual agenda to lie or remain silent, through sexual activity with heterosexual partners, through organ and semen donation.
I despise them for their promiscous lack of sexual restraint, their stated feeling of superiority over "breeders" and their demand for approval of their deviant, unhealthy lifestyle.
I haven't examined the statistics that show a shortened life for homosexuals, but it wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Oh, thanks for the clarification Mr. Clinton. Whatever.
I'd think they'd prefer getting it this way. So to speak.
And that person was you. And my calling you a coward is so far valid.
With a diplomatic qualifier, you nonetheless seem to hear this news with glee.
Please, sir, You don't know my heart and you ignore my own words on the matter. Whatever it takes to denigrate the messenger is your standard MO.
And you, a professing Christian, still refuse to comment on what the Bible says about homosexuality in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11.
You still refuse to comment on the CDC statistical data demonstrating the health hazards of the homosexual lifestyle. I'm sorry you can't spin the CDC as a biased source, but keep ignoring the CDC statistical data as you wish.
And some have attacked me for posting a letter, the authenticity of which is not disputed, simply for posting a letter that they don't want seen.
Sir, to what letter are you referring? What letter did you post?
You are a blessing, miss.
Apparently the CDC doesn't meet your qualificatons here.
Paul Cameron has built his career on people like you.
Slick Willy and his cigar; doomed. Tragic.
Sorry, but I still haven't called you any names. So far, you've called me a "coward" and "Mr. Clinton" for pointing out that I really didn't call you any names.
If I had to choose a name to call you, it would have to be "sophist." Look it up.
Your repeated reference to Paul Cameron continues to demonstrate your desperation. No one has mentioned Dr. Cameron, or any of his work, except you.
Once and for all, I did respond to the CDC data you posted and said it was a concern that shouldn't be ignored. That was in post 427 of the other thread.
The letter I'm referring to is the APA's letter expelling Paul Cameron, which LJ doesn't dispute is authentic, but seems to excoriate me for posting it because it resides on a server of a liberal institution. Tell me, do you think that demonstrate rationality? I don't think so.
I am a nurse. I've taken care of many gay men with many different diseases. No need to get snotty, I speak from personal experience.
And it has nothing to do with the facts of their study. That is, homosexuals were experiencing shorter life spans, exactly as Dr. Cameron stated from his own study, which was good enough for
"the Eastern Psychological Assn convention in 1993. Dr. Charles Smith of SUNY at Buffalo, chair of the session, publicly commended our novel approach and said he was going to warn the gays at his institution about the hazards of their ways. Further, it was good enough for the refereed scientific journal Omega in 1994, a journal specifically devoted to studies of death and dying." Source
I know what a sophist is. I deal with them on these threads all the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.