Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KERRY'S VIEW ON ABORTION IS NOT SO CONTRADICTORY (Wrong. ZOT!!!)
7/11/04 | lulu

Posted on 07/11/2004 4:03:45 PM PDT by lulu21

I just wanted to make a statement regarding Kerry's views on abortion. I wanted to find out what his opinion was, so I came to this website. I found article talking about how he supposidly 'opposes' abortion. Then the same author discusses how in other statements, he has said it is the woman's right. Now, he is being criticized for having contradicting statements. I just wanted to clear this up.

His actual words in saying he opposed abortion were, "There is something called freedom of conscience in the Catholic Church. I oppose abortion, personally. I don't like abortion. I believe life begins at conception. But I don't take my Catholic beliefs, my article of faith, and legislate it on a Protestant, on a Jew, or an atheist who doesn't share it. We have separation of church and state in the United States of America."

I don't think that people understand what he is saying. He is saying that he does NOT like abortion. He PERSONALLY doesn't want it. However, he cannot make a law against something just because his religion does not believe in it. He talks of separation of church and state. That is what we are supposed to have in America. This is why we cannot have organized prayer in schools. It is also why you cannot ban gay marriage on the account of your 'religion' being against it. I am Catholic as well. I also study medicine. I don't like abortion, either. I wish it was illegal. However, I do understand his point that he cannot make it illegal because he doesn't like it. That would be unconstitutional and totally against 'American' values. I hope everyone can understand that.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: abortionillegal; dummyontheloose; feminazis; flipflop; hastalavistababy; kerryabortion; lawtoolate; luluisatroll; meow; pinata; rightsofunborn; thanksthemodsknow; trollalert; umustbstuned; valhalla; vikingkitty; zot; zotmequick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Peach
Cool, Peach. You beat me to it, and with better quotes.

Oh, by the way -- the speech I linked on my post? It was provided by James Taranto at Opinion Journal.com's Best of the Web.

The Kerry website has delinked his NARAL speech. I'm sure it's just a glitch. </sarcasm>

41 posted on 07/11/2004 4:38:28 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Michael MOOOOOre is full of bull)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lulu21

Member Since: July 11th, 2004.

Nothing but a Kerry stooge.

Sorry but under Catholic Faith life begins at CONCEPTION, period.... you either live your faith or you don't. If you live your faith and life begins at conception, allowing abortion to be legal is a violation of the 10 commandments of God....

Kerry's attempt to spin his behavior as moral is nothing more than the same old Democratic nonsense... last guy wanted us to question what the meaning of "is" is... this guy wants us to "ignore the faith behind the curtain"...

I got no problem with Kerry admitting he's not a devout Catholic.. because honestly he's not. But to try to claim he's a devout catholic and then attempt to explain away his affronts to the Catholic faith as being a good catholic... well... that just ain't gonna fly.


42 posted on 07/11/2004 4:38:47 PM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

LOL.

Convenient "glitches" that Kerry has. Hah!


43 posted on 07/11/2004 4:39:24 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lulu21

Yeesh, I just sat down...hold on, let me get my helmet..

44 posted on 07/11/2004 4:39:51 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
Thanks for clarifying that.

Does this mean that John Kerry will also recognize my right to refuse to pay taxes, too? Or recognize the rights of men to beat their wives?

/sarcasm off/

He's full of sh!t, no matter how you try to spin it. Every law in this criminalizes any kind of behavior effectively forces one moral viewpoint on others.

45 posted on 07/11/2004 4:40:45 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
Lulu, I was gonna comment but I see you've been sutiably chastised, corrected and given a proper chance to trod the enlightened path.

I will add this. "Separation of church and state" is a phrase plucked out of aletter from a President to a Dnabury Baptist Minister by an anti-Catholic bigot by the name of Justice Hugo Black who enshrined it in the secular, lefty hall of fame in, I believe, 1947.

46 posted on 07/11/2004 4:41:31 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom

The Church is also against murder. But Kerry would never apply "Freedom of Conscience" to murder. If he truely believed life begins at conception, he must then see abortion as murder, and he should oppose it just like any other murder.


47 posted on 07/11/2004 4:43:56 PM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4mycountry

Kittie, kittie, kittie!


48 posted on 07/11/2004 4:44:12 PM PDT by netmilsmom ("We haven't begun military action. the world will know when we do." -Marine in Fallujah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

lol!


49 posted on 07/11/2004 4:44:14 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lulu21; Polycarp IV
BZZZZZZZT!!

"Freedom of conscience" presumes a well-formed conscience, and does not in any way condone or allow action in direct contradiction to Church teaching.

The right to life is not only Church teaching, but is part of the natural law, which cannot be overridden by civil law.

Nice try, but no cigar.

50 posted on 07/11/2004 4:44:43 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21

5..4...3...2...1...


51 posted on 07/11/2004 4:45:36 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21

Lulu where are U U


52 posted on 07/11/2004 4:48:12 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
http://www.noapathy.org/tracts/mythofseparation.html
 
The statement about a wall of separation between church and state was made in a letter on January 1, 1802, by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut.  The congregation heard a widespread rumor that the Congregationalists, another denomination, were to become the national religion.  This was very alarming to people who knew about religious persecution in England by the state established church.  Jefferson made it clear in his letter to the Danbury Congregation that the separation was to be that government would not establish a national religion or dictate to men how to worship God.  Jefferson's letter from which the phrase "separation of church and state" was taken affirmed first amendment rights.  Jefferson wrote:
I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.  (1)
The reason Jefferson choose the expression "separation of church and state" was because he was addressing a Baptist congregation; a denomination of which he was not a member.  Jefferson wanted to remove all fears that the state would make dictates to the church. 

53 posted on 07/11/2004 4:48:34 PM PDT by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
Re: I don't like abortion, either. I wish it was illegal.

Please, cute little lulu21, who just signed up today (awwww that's soooo cuuuute) Have the courage of your convictions to stand up for your core values.

54 posted on 07/11/2004 4:49:14 PM PDT by ChadGore (Vote Bush. He's Earned It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: lulu21
I do understand his point that he cannot make it illegal because he doesn't like it. That would be unconstitutional and totally against 'American' values. I hope everyone can understand that.

Yes, he tacitly and gutlessly approves of it.

it is as simple as that.

Either you are for or against something. There really is no middle ground as he and you are apparently claiming.

Although, it would make sense to not be in the position of legislating morality, the courts legislated it for us.

Now the only other option is to legislate it out.

Those who fail to take a position for political reasons, as Kerry does with everything from fruit to nuts, have no moral convictions and therefore no moral clarity.

They are nothing but putz balls.

56 posted on 07/11/2004 4:49:37 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Now we have two "Johns" to flush! And both appear to plugged up and overflowing with crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
He is saying that he does NOT like abortion. He PERSONALLY doesn't want it. However, he cannot make a law against something just because his religion does not believe in it.

He's perfectly comfortable with laws against paying unfair wages, and prohibiting racial discrimination. Both of these positions are very much in alignment with the Catholic faith. Yet abortion is about killing a fellow human being, and suddenly he can't bring himself to support legislation?

His rationalization is a paper-thin defense, only believed by the amazingly gullible, or morally corrupt.

57 posted on 07/11/2004 4:53:43 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
Abortion is the killing of a human being and it is hardly self-defense...the baby, so delicate, that it is cradled in liquid in the womb; protected from diseases, germs, bumps and all those things he/she will encounter when stronger and released from the safety of it's mother's womb. What a plan, don'tcha think?

It's murder cut and dry!!

58 posted on 07/11/2004 4:55:08 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu21
However, he cannot make a law against something just because his religion does not believe in it.

What if his religion does not believe in theft, rape, or exceeding the speed limit?

59 posted on 07/11/2004 4:55:24 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
He's perfectly comfortable with laws against paying unfair wages, and prohibiting racial discrimination. Both of these positions are very much in alignment with the Catholic faith. Yet abortion is about killing a fellow human being, and suddenly he can't bring himself to support legislation?

As Kerry has shown that he has no core values ever thing he supports must have a immediate payoff.

The kids can't vote for another 18 years. Thus there is no quick payoff to Kerry trying for their vote.

But the people who want to kill these kids for fun and profit are currently able to vote. So it pays for Kerry to grovel for their votes

60 posted on 07/11/2004 4:59:27 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Even if your choices are limited to Pestilence, Famine, or Death, you can still make a wise choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson