Posted on 07/11/2004 4:43:20 PM PDT by Coleus
Sounds like a racial/ethnic thing, huh...
That may be true. I do know that Los Alamos is once again facing a very embarassing, not to mention critical, loss of nuclear technology. It's the third time this year alone.
What I found particularly disturbing was the promise that someone 'might' lose their job over this. Job hell, put the sons of b------ in prison and throw away the key.
If the moderators on this site don't want to ban you for name-calling, I'm going to start calling you every name you deserve to be called.
Back at you, see my tagline.
Both of you present yourself to the forum as ex-Marines who are currently active duty LEO's with the Border Patrol. With the presumed sanctions and responsibilities ... including proxy to use lethal force ... those positions entail.
Both of you actively corrupt - anonymously - the vital sanctity of duty and command authority that is the foundation of military and LEO cohesiveness. You come onto this forum and openly disparage your commanding officers and the orders, laws and policies they hand down, and of which you are sworn as LEOs to uphold. One wonders how self-professed Marines can compromise their training to maintain the sanctity of command discipline and unit cohesiveness so readily. For this audience.
And, don't give me any private citizen "free speech" hoopty doo. When you seize the deference and presumed legitimacy given to "insiders", then use it to promote political agendas, your identities become open to scrutiny.
You have no business posting, as anonymous yet self-professed Federal Agents, to an internet forum. No former Marine, no active duty Federal LEO, worthy of respect would be here making editorial comments or working political agendas.
Who are you?
It has nothing to do with ethnicity and everything to do with importing criminals....like we don't have enough homegrown ones...and they get away with it because our government and law enforcement people haven't got the guts, or the will, to enforce our laws or control our borders.
btttt
Well, I guess you still don't understand,
JURIES (Our Peers) award settlements, NOT trial Lawyers.
If you want to blame someone it's the JURIES who are DUMB enough to make these settlements. In what cave do you live?
And as I said countless times before, the ISSUE is his liberal VOTING record. Edwards does NOT represent conservatives by his JOB but by his LIBERAL VOTING RECORD, BY THE ISSUES FOR WHICH HE STANDS.
Live with it, or just stop reading my posts. I don't recall ever posting to you.
I'm on this thread because the poster I addressed made a ridiculous remark about GWB, and I called him on it.
Boy, I sure am glad these illegals are boosting our economy. < /sarcasm >
that's a good one.
I noticed your profile page is empty. How interesting that you berate me for not id'ing myself when you don't have the sack to do the same.
So you are saying that all immigrants who are "imported' are criminals. I disagree with your thesis.
My contention is that you will always have bad apples, be they white, black, hispanic, asian, or polka dot.
Your posts and MI posts are always informative.
Uh the trial lawyers ask for such settlements and usually the defense is at a disadvantage because of the system.
Would you be in favor of a loser pays system, I would. It would decrease significantly the number of frivolous suits.
But what the hey be all for increasing medical and insurance rates due to outrageous awards, you have that right as an American.
Thanks:)
No; I'm saying that we have enough criminals of our own without allowing an invasion of illegal foreigners....and if they are illegals and they are imported, then yes, they are all criminals by definition. No, I'm not saying that all immigrants are criminals. Probably most legal immigrants are not.
Did you notice the article didn't say a word about Baca or Boxer.
You are here doing the same, only trumpeting your status as a former marine and current active duty Federal Agent and LEO involved in Immigration policing.
If I disparage Bush, Ridge and the DHS over immigration policy, it's as a citizen with only the responsibilities and standing of any anonymous citizen. When you do so, you do it with a presumed standing, special insight and import your position warrants. That's subject to abuse, and you are an abuser. Gutlessly, anonymously.
Once again: Who are you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.