Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP's `Christian nation'(party platform)
Boston Globe ^ | July 12, 2004 | Cathy Young

Posted on 07/12/2004 5:10:45 PM PDT by take

Edited on 07/12/2004 5:13:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

GOP's `Christian nation' AFTER A SHORT respite from the fight over the Pledge of Allegiance, the Republican Party has once again thrown itself into the fray over issues of church and state. This time it's the Republican Party of Texas, President Bush's home state, which has approved a plank in its platform affirming that

"the United States of America is a Christian nation."

The plank, which also pooh-poohs "the myth of the separation of church and state," has elicited protests from Jewish groups. So far, however, it has not been rejected by the national Republican Party. This is in contrast to a similar flap in 1992: A statement by then-Mississippi Governor Kirk Fordice at a Republican governors' convention that

"the United States is a Christian nation"

was met with rebukes from leading Republicans, and Fordice eventually had to apologize. True, the Texas Republican Party's plank also includes the "Judeo-Christian" formula that the national Republican leadership defended in 1992 ("our nation was founded on fundamental Judeo-Christian principles based on the Holy Bible").

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christian; gop; nation; party; platform; rncplatform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2004 5:10:46 PM PDT by take
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: take

I object as much as anyone else to the Democrats' anti-religious and anti-Christian bigotry, but this plank is just stupid.


2 posted on 07/12/2004 5:14:35 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Couldn't agree more.


3 posted on 07/12/2004 5:16:50 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Almost like they're ASKING the Dims to pile on.


4 posted on 07/12/2004 5:18:33 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: take
"the United States of America is a Christian nation."

I pray that it will be someday.

5 posted on 07/12/2004 5:20:15 PM PDT by Luke (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: take

It's about time the Republican Party starts to distinguish itself from the Democrats and acknowledge America as a Christian Nation.


6 posted on 07/12/2004 5:21:40 PM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam; All

For the sake of argument..could, IYO..the platform say the "US is a god-fearing nation" or "a religious nmation"..you'd have the same objectors...I say..in for an ounce, in for a pound..might as well stand for your convictions..


7 posted on 07/12/2004 5:23:15 PM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: take

YEAH....anyone read the DEM's Party Platform?.....it must be the EVIL NATION.....


8 posted on 07/12/2004 5:23:58 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Never underestimate the desire of a socialist to TAKE AWAY YOUR HARD EARNED FUNDS to help "others")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: take
("our nation was founded on fundamental Judeo-Christian principles based on the Holy Bible").

It's true.

9 posted on 07/12/2004 5:28:56 PM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Sadly, If "America is a Constitutional Republic" was considered at all, it was probably rejected because it isn't something people can relate to.


10 posted on 07/12/2004 5:33:21 PM PDT by tacticalogic ( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
I object as much as anyone else to the Democrats' anti-religious and anti-Christian bigotry, but this plank is just stupid.

This will please exactly one constituency: evangelical Christians who believe that the Republican party should promote Christian values. It will only serve to intensify criticism that there is no room for non-Christians in the GOP.

It is getting to the point in this country where Christians are not so much interested in their neighbors coming to Christ as they are their neighbors acting like Christians. The church has prospered amidst paganism and Communist oppression, but some seem to feel that unless we chisel the word "God" into every public building, the gates of Hell may finally prevail.

11 posted on 07/12/2004 5:35:07 PM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine
It's true.

Except the Texas GOP Platform refers only to "Christians," not to "Judeo-Christian." And what exactly do they mean by "Christians?" I've heard people from that area of the Country claim that Catholics aren't Christians.

12 posted on 07/12/2004 5:35:50 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

I agree absolutely. This plank is completely pointless (so, if the party is elected, then what do they plan to do about this?) and just amounts to trolling moderates.


13 posted on 07/12/2004 5:38:03 PM PDT by SedVictaCatoni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Except the Texas GOP Platform refers only to "Christians," not to "Judeo-Christian." And what exactly do they mean by "Christians?" I've heard people from that area of the Country claim that Catholics aren't Christians.

Wrong, here is the exact wording from the plank.

Christian Nation- The Republican Party of Texas affirms that the United States of America is a Christian nation, and the public acknowledgement of God is undeniable in our history. Our nation was founded on fundamental Judeo-Christian principles based on the Holy Bible. The Party affirms freedom of religion, and rejects efforts of courts and secular activists who seek to remove and deny such a rich heritage from our public lives.

The next plank is on free excericse of religion and the plank after is on religious institutions and governments. What exactly is wrong with any of that?
14 posted on 07/12/2004 6:04:44 PM PDT by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jf55510

I've read two on three articles on the platform and this is the first I've learned that the platform actually does refer to "Judeo-Christian priciples." You wouldn't know that from some of the main stream media reports. Thanks for straightening me out.


15 posted on 07/12/2004 6:09:14 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Except the Texas GOP Platform refers only to "Christians," not to "Judeo-Christian." And what exactly do they mean by "Christians?" I've heard people from that area of the Country claim that Catholics aren't Christians.

This a a good article that explains the difference. What does 'Judeo-Christian' mean?

16 posted on 07/12/2004 6:15:20 PM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aquamarine

Good read, thanks.


17 posted on 07/12/2004 6:18:10 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

As one who lives in Tx I agree. Founded on religious priciples, whatever, but why state it so narrowly? Grrrr


18 posted on 07/12/2004 6:19:46 PM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jf55510
"What exactly is wrong with any of that?"

It excludes the fact that the Bible consists of two books one of which is the Hebrew Bible and implies that the principles alluded to are Christian only, to the exclusion of half the book from which those values and the heritage of Christ himself are derived.

Yes, it does allude to the Judea aspect further on, but why fan the flames of controversy if it serves no obvious point?

Lastly, the verbiage dismisses the fact that several of the founding fathers were Deist.
19 posted on 07/12/2004 6:31:23 PM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Good read, thanks.

You're welcome.
The last sentence in that article is a stunner.

20 posted on 07/12/2004 6:38:46 PM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson