To: wagglebee
There's only one problem with this assertion. If al Qaeda has the nukes here, why haven't they already used them? They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life.
To: Joe Bonforte
...They gain nothing by delay,...Exactly. If you're Al Qaeda and your network is being decimated daily, your comrades are being questioned in Gitmo and elsewhere, how long do you think it will be before the Yanks find you or your nukes?
Logic would dictate that you use 'em before you lose 'em.
15 posted on
07/13/2004 7:22:27 PM PDT by
FReepaholic
(My other tagline is hilarious.)
To: Joe Bonforte
And if they really have nukes, why haven't they tested one? How can they be sure they will work? If the Russians, Americans, Chinese etc. must test theirs with all their technology, why not the mad mullahs?
If they really do, they are playing with extinction. There are unfortunately, precedents.
To: Joe Bonforte
"There's only one problem with this assertion. If al Qaeda has the nukes here, why haven't they already used them?"Exactly. The article says they purchased 20 devices in 1996 yet they chose to use hijacked airplanes on Sept. 11, 2001?
28 posted on
07/13/2004 7:29:57 PM PDT by
Boss_Jim_Gettys
(I am a Republican attack dog.)
To: Joe Bonforte
Agree..for more info go to:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/03/23/MNG8D5PM7L1.DTL
34 posted on
07/13/2004 7:33:37 PM PDT by
lawdog
To: Joe Bonforte
" They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life." Maybe that's the cause of the delay. They had to figure out how to 'refresh?' them.
35 posted on
07/13/2004 7:33:59 PM PDT by
blam
To: Joe Bonforte
If al Qaeda has the nukes here, why haven't they already used them? They gain nothing by delay, Can you say October Surprise? Hoping for the Spanish effect writ large, very large.
49 posted on
07/13/2004 7:46:01 PM PDT by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Joe Bonforte
Or better yet, why hasn't Israel been hit. Logic would say since Israel is the mud in their eye, then it should go first. The fact that is hasn't speaks volumes, both in terms of Israel's preparedness and the Islamocrazies capabilities.
61 posted on
07/13/2004 7:57:07 PM PDT by
L`enn
To: Joe Bonforte
There's only one problem with this assertion. If al Qaeda has the nukes here, why haven't they already used them?It seems they operate according to dates that are significant to them.
89 posted on
07/13/2004 9:00:37 PM PDT by
BJungNan
(Kerry = No1 Liberal, Edwards = No 4 Liberal)
To: Joe Bonforte
They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life. Bingo!
prisoner6
99 posted on
07/13/2004 9:33:46 PM PDT by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the left fall out!)
To: Joe Bonforte
Well might be that "they" want to set up a "nuclear pecking order"...have too many nukes in too many countries...once the first goes off others will too...and the pecking order will spread like a cancer...
141 posted on
07/14/2004 9:23:24 AM PDT by
antivenom
("Never argue with an idiot, he'll bring you down to his level - then beat you with experience.")
To: Joe Bonforte
5 - "They gain nothing by delay, and nukes don't have an indefinite shelf life."
True. And something many Americans forget - our nukes have a 20 year shelf life, and the last weapon we built (the very last one) was in 1990.
How many do we have left?
169 posted on
07/16/2004 1:22:39 PM PDT by
XBob
(Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson