Formal Ethics Charged Filed Against Democrat Maloney of New York for U.N. Observer Request

7-15-04

[jmstein7]

Filing formalities - complete!

[jmstein7]

Filed Formal Ethics Charges Against Carolyn Maloney.

[Tamzee]

There you have it - prove me wrong.

Nope... you look like you're too far gone. I have better things to do with my time.

[ez]

These Dems are someday going to pay the price of allowing themselves to live in their little "fantasy" world where Bush lied and Gore won the election.

Next!

[kcar]

BTTT.

[xone]

bttt

[Congressman Billybob]

Several years ago, the House of Representatives quietly changed its Rules so that only Members of the House can file Ethics Complaints against any Members. So, even if this Complaint is duly filed, it will go nowhere except into the trash unless it was filed by a Member.

Was it so filed? Or is it meaningless?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "To the Supreme Court: I Quit"

[familyofman]

"...fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001(a) and 1001(c)(1) by knowingly and willfully making and using a false writing which knowingly contained to procure services from the United Nations, i.e. said letter to the U.N."

Is it fraud if the person making the statement(s) beleives them to be 'true' at the time they are made? Or, is the definition more broad in that the fraud can occur if a third party (you/me) find her statements to be false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements ?

I'm not a lawyer (phew) but find the second instance much too broad to be enforceble. If the third party claims a statement made is 'false, fictitious' - then fraud can be claimed by almost anyone anytime. I would think the party making the statement would have to 'know' what was being said was/is false for fraud to take place.
If a dimwit felt that GWB made a fraudulent statement (16 words in SOTU speech, Iraq) would he then be liable for being charged with fraud, etics charge, or even impeachment?

[EQAndyBuzz]

Oh no, if this is true, this will grow legs.

I think the Republicans had enough of liberal obstructionism. This election is a biggy and it the Republicans have drawn a line in the sand.

Democrats that are not left leaning take heed.

[Mark17]

Maybe I do not remember right, but I vaguely remember some female demon rat running for congress on a gun control platform. Could this be the one?

[dirtboy]

Maybe I do not remember right, but I vaguely remember some female demon rat running for congress on a gun control platform.

Like that differentiates any female Dem Congressional candidates :^)

[wasp69]

Dude, who filed this?

[RJL]

jmstein7,

If you fill in all the blanks and "xxx"'s so it is presentable, I will gladly send it to my Rep asking for action.

[afnamvet]

Prosecution to the extent of federal law by justice is fesable if enough us contact our legislators to make it happen.

[jmstein7]

CB,

I'm aware of that detail, and it has been handled :)

[jmstein7]

Yes... Maloney is the one.

[ampat]

I hope rep baloney gets whats coming to her. Another disgrace of congress.

[devolve]

Carolyn McCarthy

"I am a Lifelong registered Republican........"

Or as I asked her once when she was a guest on WABC 770am NYC:



"May I call you Carolyn....."


[always works!]


Just before I did my patented smoothie fact dump on her and made her nervously admit she knew zip about firearms and her nutcase statements -

She quickly ended her call to WABC; that was her last conservation with a "caller" that day!

Maloney is just another lying radical NY freak



......it's a jungle out there