Posted on 07/16/2004 2:45:01 AM PDT by kattracks
Is she black? I thought she was just dirty!
Surely Whoopi should NOT be around children...even in cyberspace. Let's protest THAT!
Exactly.
If it weren't for the GOP, Whoopie could still be a slave.
I haven't been ignoring your comments folks... I was offline for a few days while moving to a new house. Now it's time to start freeping again!
Im not sure if slimfast sponsored whoopi's comedy act. If she was there speaking out as a free citizen of the United States then her speech would be protected by the Constitution. To hold Slimfast accountable for her remarks-not occurring while acting as their spokesperson would, in that case be misguided.
Since I don't listen to the Kerry fundraising events, I don't know what Whoopi said. It is not uncommon, however, for comediens to make jokes about politicians. It must have been REALLY BAD however, because there was more of a fuss made about it than the liberals made of the "Girly-boy" remark made by Ahnold. Send me a link to a site that has whoopi's remarks if you know of one because I can't find one around. Thanks!
Check out what Cheney said on the floor of the Senate the other day:
In a chance encounter in the Senate, where the vice president is sometimes the presiding officer, Cheney reacted to a face-to-face meeting with Democratic senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who had criticized him about his ties to the Halliburton Company, Cheney's former employer. Cheney told the senator to go "f--- yourself" as he stalked off in indignation. So much for the president's pledge to bring about "a return to civility" to Washington.
I copied this from the website; Thewashingtonspectator.com .
It seems that the liberal media is always trying to make us look bad.
But I'm sure "Crappy GoldTwit" is all up in arms about the statement by ShwarzenKennedy, calling the DemonRATs "Girly-Men"...she's defending HIS "Freedom of Speech" against all the DemonRATs caterwauling over his "EEEEEeeevil" slander...right?
< insert cricket sound here... >
Welcome to FR, WWJD. If you have read this thread you will realize that the Constitution protects the rights of citizens to free speech from retaliation BY THE GOVERNMENT. It says nothing about other citizens reactions to statements by free citizens. The group from FR that boycotted and e-mailed Slim Fast was simply exercising their right to free speech by telling the company they would no longer patronize their products as long as their spokesperson was irresponsible. This has nothing to do with constitutionally guaranteed rights of free speech. Again, welcome to FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.