Skip to comments.The EXPLANATION: Sandy Berger is covering up Bill Clinton’s GREATEST CRIME (2004)
Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C
What do some of the craziest events in recent American History all have in common? No, this is not another Blue Dress story, but it is about the biggest crime Bill Clinton committed as president. It was such a small political lie for him but it turned out to have incredible ramifications to our country. Slick Willy may be headed for the title of worst president in United States history, in fact, he might even qualify for the biggest traitor label.
And further more, you dont even suspect it happened.
Just what was Sandy Berger doing stuffing documents into his clothes while preparing for the 9-11 hearings? Lanny Davis was on natioal news earlier today saying that the leak right before the Democratic Convention just had to be politically motivated.
Did you ever wonder how literally hundreds of witnesses could see a mass murder but the official report not only ignores these citizens but offers solutions that are physically impossible? Conclusions such as this are possible whenever the conspiracy label is attached. And what was all the fuss about Jamie Gorelick being on the 9-11commission? Why did we get bored seeing Richard Clark attacking President Bush in the 9-11 hearings? If youre one of Bill Clintons boys or girls that was in his inner circle, the noose is tightening.
They know what happened but you dont know, not yet.
In 1994, Bill Clinton was shocked at the Republican massacre in the congressional election. His chances of reelection seemed dim. Drastic action was called for if he was going to see a second term.
The first challenge to Bill Clinton was the Federal Building bombing at Oklahoma City in 1995. As documented in Jayana Davis book The Third Terrorist, McVeigh and Nichols were not the only ones involved in the bombing. It seems that there were Iraqi defectors from Gulf War 1 in OKC. One of the Iraqi soldiers got out of the truck with McVeigh a few minutes before the truck bomb exploded. You may recall the story during the Nichols trial in OKC earlier this spring concerning the surveillance tape that agreed with witnesses showing two men getting out of the truck. Later, the FBI said there was no surveillance tape. This same Iraqi later moved to Boston and was working at Boston Logan Intl airport the morning of 9-11-01. Is it a small world or was something going on here? The FBI has never investigated.
In Jaynas book, she ties the Iraqis together with McVeigh and Nichols. Read the book and listen to her interview with Jim Quinn from Pittsburgh in the WARROOM which was aired April 20, 2004. It is in the archives. It will open your eyes.
Why did the investigation focus on two Americans when numerous witnesses testified that others were involved? And of course the initial reports detailed that two middle Eastern men were wanted? What happened?
Bill Clinton knew that if it was shown that foreign terrorists were killing Americans in Oklahoma City his chance of being reelected would vanish. Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing middle eastern terrorists from the equation and concluding that two right wing extremists motivated by Waco were the cause, the only cause. There was no Middle Eastern conspiracy by presidential order.
Flash ahead to July, 1996 and an airplane leaving from JFK in New York City crashes off Long Island. Hundreds of witnesses see a missile shoot the plane from the sky but the investigation concludes that it was a center fuel tank explosion. Jack Cashill in his book on flight TWA 800 faces the same problem that Jayna Davis did with the Oklahoma City bombing a year earlier. WHY? Witnesses saw one thing but the investigation reported something else.
The crash of TWA 800 occurred before the Democratic convention. As in Oklahoma City, Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing terrorism from the equation. Richard Clark supplied the center fuel tank scenario, the CIA supplied the computer simulation and Bill Clinton was home free.
Flash ahead to 9-11-01: Bill Clinton has said several times that he first thought of Bin Laden when he heard about the WTC attacks. Actually it had to be Al Qaeda, not Iraq, or his brilliant plan might be discovered. But Clinton was not out of the woods yet.
The 9-11 commission is tasked with finding the truth. Jamie Gorelick is on the commission to ensure they dont. Sandy Berger while preparing to testify is caught removing classified documents by hiding them under his clothes. Anyone who has ever held a TOP SECRET clearance can relate to the sinking feeling he must have in his stomach today as the news is released.
The lies that turned to conspiracy theories led to thousands dying in NYC and Washington, DC on 9-11. Instead of Bill Clinton taking care of business in Iraq in 1995 when Iraqi defectors were caught killing Americans he covered up their involvement to get reelected. His co-conspirators are still trying to cover up the biggest lie in American history.
One of the questions now facing Sandy Berger is will he get a deal? Im sure he watches Law and Order occasionally so hes probably familiar with the process. Sell out Bill Clinton and the democratic party and you may get out of jail one day. Otherwise, it just doesnt look very good.
Bill Clinton, the noose is tightening around your neck. Your legacy is the least of your problems. Everyone understands youre a natural born liar but most didnt even suspect the havoc you caused with you lies in 1995.
Now everyone will know it wasnt an intelligence failure. It was Slick Willy all along.
Lanny could very well be right.
This story may have been leaked by a RAT with the pre-meditated "it's a conspiracy" response ready for deployment.
But, we differ in that you think much more higly of Slick than do I. You suggest that his motivation for lying, treason and general dishonesty was reelection. I believe he was well paid for almost everything he did. The Saudis and Iraqis paid Willie to stay away from Osama. The money may have come from Marc Risch (who Willie pardoned) but it was Iraqi/Saudi money.
But, your script WILL make a great documentary! A sure winner at Cannes!!
Interesting read. Where ya from?
Just occurred to me--let's refer to the archives scandal as the "Folies Bergere"!
How apropos--it's French!
I am a frequent visitor on Free Republic.
The key here is that Bill Clinton understands that once an issue degrades to conspiracy theory, it's an open invitation to lie.
Look at a graph of conspiracy theory issues vs. time in the 20th century, you'll see a big peak during Clinton's years.
Bill loves conspiracy, It's a license to lie. And that's what he does best!
Bill Clinton said today that he'd known about the federal probe on Berger for months. If he knew, many others on the Left knew as well..Hillary, Bruce Lindsey, Kerry, etc. I don't believe for one minute that the Kerry Campaign didn't know about this investigation.
Okay, here it is. I've been waiting for the pieces to fall into place, and Mr. Bill_C has come up with a plausible theory, and provided a cogent thread detailing what most of us have probably been thinking. Let's put it to the test.
Hitting the hay early tonight.
We all recall how Clinton Admin. put bad news out, for instance, on a Friday, as a preemptive strike. My hope and guess is that Ashcroft close to charging McBergler, but someone close to BC was the leaker. Thus every desparate democrat can go to convention and claim what you said, and avoid the fact their candidate is a full fledged incompetent boob.
Yes, the OKC bombing, flight 800, AQ plans that were known but avoided by the Clinturd administration, even AQ/Iraq/WMD ties......all possibilities.
I fervently pray that Ashcroft and the DOJ goes after this like unrelenting hellfire.
Mass55th,you're right--so many people today are ADMITTING they KNEW about this investigation for months--you know-the old "nothing to see here--it's old news--move along" type of response.
Well if so many people knew, any leak as accused by the Demons could have come from anywhere, including the Democrats trying to head off the maximum impact this might have if it was held a bit longer.
In any event--Berger deserves jail--what he did was deliberate and compromised our national security.
Let's see if he does a "Webb Hubbell" for the Clintons.
take a look at this theory.
The clinton administration was full of traitors and other criminals, yet none has ever been charged and none ever will be. God only knows how much evidence against these bastards exists, but the Bush administration steadfasly refuses to prosecute.
The clinton administration was full of traitors and other criminals, yet none has ever been charged and none ever will be. God only knows how much evidence against these bastards exists, but the Bush administration steadfastly refuses to prosecute.
Look at a graph of conspiracy theory issues vs. time in the 20th century, you'll see a big peak during Clinton's years.
And the fact that the Bush Admin REFUSES to pursue any crimes committed by the Clinton Admin helps to justify the 'conspiracy' label.
Spineless wussies, they are. Laws were violated and Americans died.
Where's quidam when you really need him?
But, we differ in that you think much more higly of Slick than do I. You suggest that his motivation for lying, treason and general dishonesty was reelection. I believe he was well paid for almost everything he did..
They must have had some reason to believe that the investigation would be quashed -- or Kerry would have dumped Berger long ago.
As Limbaugh stated on his program today, "Sandy Burgler better stay away from Fort Marcy Park".
When you make an assertion such as this, and you make it twice, you need to provide some supporting evidence other than tin foil, that such events occurred, or the whole thing (theory), however reasonable sounding, can be dismissed.
Hey quidam - get over here!
This is not entirely improbable. But I've given up on the idea of seeing the truth emerge about the OKC or the TWA800 coverups. Too many people in the FBI and the CIA were involved.
Missed responding to you on the Jenna thread Happy. There always has to be a party pooper!!
Perhaps. But it's possible that they didn't think this was going to have legs...and then it did.
Berger is in a room, poring over papers and documents and (a) camera(s) is/are running.
Certainly Berger isn't so very stupid to think this could be pulled off ... unless there are clintonista operatives involved with aforementioned camera(s).
Or so he thought.
The 'operative' approaches Justice, Justice 'allows' continued theft, brings it to President Bush and the plot thickens.
Berger is approached, 'confesses' and is led to believe that he isn't such very hot water after all.
President Bush has known all along and has authorized the release of this information.
Bush by a landslide in 2004 and he now has his own brand of the 900 FBI files.
Clintons fade into noisy oblivian ... the bwitch becomes a powerless shrew and x42 diddles girls all over the globe.
Must be why Hillary put the kabash on allowing the Fed to poke around in Cayman Island accounts.
Thanks for the ping ovrtaxt!
Jamie Gorelick was tasked
When you make an assertion such as this, and you make it twice, you need to provide some supporting evidence other than tin foil, that such events occurred
Once it is known what was taken and what was in those documents, then and only then can I say that the noose is tightening on x42id, scumbag president forever.
If this truly blows the lid off of Clinton's perfidity, then the supreme bitch herself is little more than toast.
Are y'all lurking out there tonight? We would love to have your input on this trouserbergler thing...
Now, that's what I call connecting the dots. Great job BILL_C! Thanks for the heads up to this thread prairie! Excellent thread!
EVERYONE, call your local talk shows tomorrow and bring this up...We need to get a buzz going nationwide, letting people know about this coverup by Berger.
Precisely how the Democrats are spinning it on the talkshows tonight. They're even saying "Why are we discussing Clinton?!? He's not in the White House, Bush is in the White House."
The "8 Great Years Of Bill Clinton" is just the whitewash on the fence to fool the unsuspecting that there's nothing to see but a white picket fence, if you ask me.
Was Clinton spending terrorist money going after everyday American conservatives?
I was just wondering about what state you are from.
I'm from Pennsylvania. I know it's no big deal, I was just curious.
OK, thanks a lot.
I'm willing to bet a steak dinner that Berger was in there lifting out Clinton's obvious foreign policy failures from the document stack. Leaving a paper trail that connected Bush 41 and Bush 43, as if nothing went wrong during the Clinton administration. It would fit the template of the left-winged kookburger conspiracy theory that Clinton was the "Greatest President of the late 20th Century" and the Bush's were/are complete failures.
I think that's exactly what happened - a preemptive strike. Guess it backfired. Whoops....
Thanks for the PING...
BKMRK for later...
Looking for a previous thread at the moment...
Getting Late...Not Thinking Clearly!
That's a very good point. What was their reason, I wonder? Any ideas, expatpat or any Freeper?
Oh yeah this is the real deal....but I have believed that since 1993 and the first WTC...once I read Bodansky and Mylroie I knew that we were in a wrold of hurt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.