Posted on 07/22/2004 10:11:52 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
Let's start a list of Questions we'd like answers too since reporters read FR maybe they will get some ideas... so have at it
Has Sandy Berger had his security clearence revoked If no WHY not? If yes when and by whome?
What did he steal and why did he steal it?
Tube or crew?
What i want to know he was a former nsa man so do you get accsess to that stuff for life or what? hes not employed as one then so how did he get in there
GoGov.com had a great round up on this today. Funny piece about an article written by Sandy Berger about Cell Phone Cameras. Not that Sandy Berger, but darned ironic.
Why were you treated like the boss, breaking rules and demanding special priveledges, who inside allowed this?
well he had legit reasons because he was reviewing notes for testimony for 911 commish.
Who were you stealing the documents for? What did he tell you to do? Will you testify against him in a court of law?
Here is another one....
WHO is the archive employee that called CLINTONS LAWYER when he suspected docs were missing?
Why wasnt the FBI notified immediately
Are all documents in the NA scanned or microfilmed BEFORE putting them out for display?
Who did he call on his cellphone from the archive location? How long was he on the phone? Can we see his cellphone records for the days that he visited the archive?
darn good question there.
How is it that anybody, I don't care who they are, can take out anything from the National Archive's? How is when it happens, instead of outrage there is spin, spin, spin... and you (media) fuel the spin... how is this?
What are Bill and Hillary holding over Berger's head that would cause him to throw away his whole political career by stealing and destroying classified documents.
Very curious.
Paraphrasing Sen. Mitch McConnell...why put PDBs in your BVDs & docs in your socks?
Is your life insurance policy paid up, and did you recently increase the death benefits?
How about your will ? Is it signed and in a secure place ?
Will your executors be able to find it quickly or is it stuffed down someone's pants?
Why would Berger draw attention to himself by stealing the same documents again--documents that had obviously been discovered, because they had been replaced? Is this behavior compatible with trying to conceal anything? Are these Millenium Report documents really the ones he was after, or the ones that would get him the least time in prison, and his bosses none? Given a choice of 3-5 years for destroying classified documents, or the trial of the century with half the clinton crew as defendents, did Berger pick door number 1?
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.