Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Beware... The contract has been signed.
US Department of Defense ^ | July 22, 2004 | US DoD

Posted on 07/24/2004 4:13:11 AM PDT by jackmercer

This is an interesting little contract. It is a hobby of mine to monitor US Defense contracts every week as I tend to play the markets with this info.

I had assumed, as a big Jane's buff, that the Israeli military was pretty happy with their current stock of guided missles. However, upgrading to GPS vehicles for their warheads really caught my eye in light of the recent talk about Iranian reactors.

Second paragraph down on the link:

"McDonnell Douglas Corp., Saint Louis, Mo., is being awarded a $17,461,828 firm fixed price modification to provide for 840 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guided vehicles. The JDAM is a strap-on kit with inertial navigation system/global positioning system capability that provides the user with an improved aerial delivery capability for existing 500, 1000 and 2000-pound bombs. This effort supports foreign military sales to Israel. The locations of performance are McDonnell Douglas, Saint Louis, Mo., and Honeywell Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. This work will be complete by November 2005. The Air Armament Center, Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., is the contracting activity (F08635-02-C-0060, P00018)."

http://www.defenselink.mil/contracts/2004/ct20040722.html


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: iran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2004 4:13:12 AM PDT by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

That's terrific. Now I can't wait for them to put one "down the chimney"!! Semper Fidelis.


2 posted on 07/24/2004 4:21:51 AM PDT by MCFujiTanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

I thought McDonnell-Douglas was bought out by Boeing.


3 posted on 07/24/2004 4:46:03 AM PDT by libertylover (The Constitution is a road-map to liberty. Let's start following it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

That caught my eye too. There is no McDonnell-Douglas Corporation.


4 posted on 07/24/2004 4:48:50 AM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Probably just the commercial side of the house. Don't know.


5 posted on 07/24/2004 4:49:50 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer
840 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guided vehicles

Could those be intended to counter whatever Syria may have?

6 posted on 07/24/2004 4:52:45 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

21,000 a pop.....I guess thats a good deal(^)


7 posted on 07/24/2004 4:54:06 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Good catch. I find no remnants of MDC via Yahoo.


8 posted on 07/24/2004 4:58:05 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

McDonnell-Douglas Corporation still exists...
The lawsuit on the A-12 program is still in litigation. When Boeing merged with McDonnell-Douglas the corporation was left separate until the suit between the government and MDouglas is settled.


9 posted on 07/24/2004 4:58:20 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: missnry
Perhaps for litigation purposes, but I don't believe anyone can get a contract to buy anything from the McDonnell-Douglas "Corporation."

Beoing/Douglas owns all the facilities. How is the (on-paper only) McDonnell Douglas Corp going to build anything?

10 posted on 07/24/2004 5:03:52 AM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

I wish we could loan the IDF a few B-52s for as long as they needed them.


11 posted on 07/24/2004 5:13:25 AM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Shut up and sing. I don't care what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

It is a good deal, the price has come way down in real dollars from the original $100k+


12 posted on 07/24/2004 5:23:26 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer
improved aerial delivery capability for existing 500, 1000 and 2000-pound bombs

I'm not an expert in this area, but these don't seem to be big enough to take out Iran's nuclear capability. If they do this they are only going to get one shot at it and it better be good. I expect the Israelis have a bigger surprise in their arsenal.

13 posted on 07/24/2004 5:26:59 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

Here's also this, from Jane's... ( http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw040719_1_n.shtml )

Massive bomb to MOP up deeply buried targets

By Michael Sirak JDW Staff Reporter
Washington, DC


The US Air Force plans to launch a project later this year to develop an experimental ultra-large 30,000lb (13,608kg) penetrating munition, according to service officials.

It will be optimised against hardened and deeply buried targets that existing air-delivered weapons cannot destroy, they say.

The Air Force Research Laboratory's Munitions Directorate at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, is leading the three-phase technology demonstration, known as the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) programme. It builds on design studies that Boeing has conducted for the laboratory. Flight testing is envisaged around 2006.

Although the air force has no formal requirement for an ultra-large bomb, it has a concept for a 'Big BLU' family of massive-sized penetrator and blast munitions. The MOP demonstration will mature the technologies so that they are "on the shelf, ready to go" if a requirement emerges for a Big BLU penetrator, said Steven Butler, director of engineering at the Air Armament Center at Eglin. He told JDW that the MOP is "unlike anything" that the air force has ever built.

Interest in a big penetrating bomb is growing in some US defence circles, including the Defense Science Board (DSB), the senior policy advisory panel to the Secretary of Defense. It recommended in its February 2004 report on 'Future Strategic Strike Forces' that the Department of Defense "immediately undertake" a demonstration of a "bomber-delivered massive penetrator" weapon as part of a family of ultra-large bombs that would "improve conventional attack effectiveness against deep, expansive, underground tunnel facilities".


14 posted on 07/24/2004 5:31:31 AM PDT by Renfield (Philosophy chair at the University of Wallamalloo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
That caught my eye too. There is no McDonnell-Douglas Corporation.

It's sort of like when Allied Signal bought Honeywell. Allied Signal took the name Honeywell and there is no Allied Signal anymore - in name at least.

15 posted on 07/24/2004 5:36:01 AM PDT by chainsaw (http://www.hanoi-john.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
It's sort of like when Allied Signal bought Honeywell. Allied Signal took the name Honeywell and there is no Allied Signal anymore - in name at least.

Yes, but in this case the new Company name is Boeing/Douglas.

16 posted on 07/24/2004 5:38:18 AM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
improved aerial delivery capability for existing 500, 1000 and 2000-pound bombs

Well those are the intended uses. Those are a an add on guidance package. No reason it couldn't be added on to say a small Tactical Nuke.....
17 posted on 07/24/2004 5:44:17 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
In reality, Douglas took over Boeing. Since then, the commercial aircraft division has dramatically lost market share to Airbus, they've been outsourcing almost all commercial aircraft machining, etc. The defense side is what keeps them in the black now.

One troubling aspect of this JDAM contract: ISRAEL IS NOW THE SECOND LARGEST ARMS SUPPLIER TO CHINA.

Can you say "technology transfer"???? I'm an ardent supporter of Israel vs. the Palis, but I don't like the idea that Israel is using our contribution of over $1 billion in military aid each year and then resells the weapons or technology to our greatest enemy. Their sales could result in many combat deaths of our soldiers. This has to stop.

18 posted on 07/24/2004 5:50:47 AM PDT by datura (The Difference Between a Democrat and a Communist Is????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight

Actually, the corporation is called "The Boeing Company".


19 posted on 07/24/2004 6:18:34 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
I wouldn't worry about names that much. They may have MD as the name of one of the "federal systems operations" for contract purposes. I dodn't know in this particular case, but I have seen others.

Surely the accounting rules are different for the federal stuff, so that's self-contained within the FSO. The world of federal contracting is Alice in Wornderland on steroids. Not evil, conspriatorial, or whatever. Just different, for often real historical reasons.

20 posted on 07/24/2004 6:20:18 AM PDT by Blagden Alley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson