Skip to comments.
Louis Freeh: "missed opportunity" was not declaring war on al Qaeda six years earlier
Wall Street Journal ^
| 7/26/04
Posted on 07/26/2004 1:50:59 PM PDT by Doctor Wu
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
did several searches. did not see posted.
1
posted on
07/26/2004 1:51:11 PM PDT
by
Doctor Wu
To: Doctor Wu
hey freeh, thanks soooooooo much for everything
To: Doctor Wu
We STILL havn't declared war. Wish we would. Then traitors like Moore could be summarily dealt with.
3
posted on
07/26/2004 1:54:53 PM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(Hanoi John - Hanoi John - The Benedict Arnold of Vietnam)
To: Doctor Wu
To: goldwaterlives
Yeah, Louis could have raised the alarm as Director of the FBI.....
but he sold out.
Too late, Mr. Freeh, now sit down and STFU.
5
posted on
07/26/2004 1:59:15 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: MamaLucci
6
posted on
07/26/2004 2:00:02 PM PDT
by
dano1
To: Doctor Wu
Clinton did declare war on terrorism...he just didn't bother fighting it.
7
posted on
07/26/2004 2:00:59 PM PDT
by
blanknoone
(The NAACP --->NAADP National Association for the Advancement of the Democrat Party.)
To: Lexington Green
What or who may I ask would we declare war against? I assume you are referring to the War on Terror. But the declaration of war must name a country does it not?
8
posted on
07/26/2004 2:01:08 PM PDT
by
el_texicano
(Liberals are the real Mind-Numbed Robots - No Brains, No Guts, No Character...Just hate)
To: Lexington Green
Then traitors like Moore could be summarily dealt with.
Freeh did a lot more harm to this nation than fatso could ever dream of doing....the stench of the timeliness of him conveniently skating outta' Dodge a week and a half prior to Sept 11 still hangs in the air.
9
posted on
07/26/2004 2:02:13 PM PDT
by
mr.pink
To: Doctor Wu
Freeh who promoted the man who gave the shoot to kill order at Ruby Ridge......that Freeh?
10
posted on
07/26/2004 2:07:59 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(IF YOU CAN READ THIS, THANK A TEACHER.......AND SINCE IT'S IN ENGLISH, THANK A SOLDIER)
To: Doctor Wu
Freeh is the spineless clown who let the criminality of the Clintons slide time and time again.
Now that he's out of power, Freeh comes out with something that makes sense. Sorry Louie, but you've come with too little, way too late.
To: mr.pink
Freeh did a lot more harm to this nation than fatso could ever dream of doing....the stench of the timeliness of him conveniently skating outta' Dodge a week and a half prior to Sept 11 still hangs in the air.
You are correct. I shouldn't even have posted my fleeting angry thought... too thin for this topic.
12
posted on
07/26/2004 2:10:49 PM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(Hanoi John - Hanoi John - The Benedict Arnold of Vietnam)
To: Doctor Wu
To: el_texicano
What or who may I ask would we declare war against? I assume you are referring to the War on Terror. But the declaration of war must name a country does it not? By "declaring war," I think he means that we should declare war against Islam. Just a guess, mind you.
14
posted on
07/26/2004 2:13:10 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Lexington Green
We STILL havn't declared war. Wish we would. Then traitors like Moore could be summarily dealt with. They could be anyway. The Constitution only mentions "enemies", not those who we have declared war upon. A nation can clearly have enemies without a declared war. We had the Soviets for decades.
Still a formal declaration would be the proper thing to do in our current situation, and would if nothing else make it easier to sweep away trash such as Moore and ANSWER.
15
posted on
07/26/2004 2:22:07 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Doctor Wu
In hindsight, we ALL now agree that six years ago the United States should have responded to al Qaeda's acts of war against us by declaring and waging a real war against these enemies Saber rattling Louis must of just got the word that his memos were removed from the archives too.
16
posted on
07/26/2004 2:23:07 PM PDT
by
bjs1779
To: el_texicano
But the declaration of war must name a country does it not? Where is that written? I would expect naming a transnational group would be acceptable and sufficient to delineate who we were declaring war upon.
17
posted on
07/26/2004 2:28:40 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: r9etb
By "declaring war," I think he means that we should declare war against Islam. That would be a little general and excessive. Sort of like declaring war on all Buddists, when the problem was the government of Nippon. We could start with a fairly short list of Islamist groups, adding language that would prevent a mere name change from "letting them off the hook". The list could be expanded as needed, but only by a new declaration from Congress, or perhaps just by action of a special Congressional committee along with the President.
18
posted on
07/26/2004 2:32:07 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: bjs1779
Saber rattling Louis must of just got the word that his memos were removed from the archives too. Freeh is still a question mark for me. I'm inclined to think he's one of the good guys.
To: bjs1779
Hey Louie, a lot of people did want to wage real war against al Qaeda.
20
posted on
07/26/2004 2:48:46 PM PDT
by
Alcibiades
(I wanted a good tagline and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson