Posted on 07/27/2004 4:49:40 AM PDT by Liz
What I am wondering about is if anyone at the National Archives was actively involved in document tampering. There may be a reason that the press has dropped the "they were only copies" routine.
That's a possibility. I thought they had perhaps realized exactly what a "copy" referred to in this sense, but maybe that was expecting too much out of them! But I think there definitely had to be somebody at the NA who was in on this from the start.
I posted an article from the WSJ a few days ago that described the bookstore at the NA: nothing but Bush-bashing books and a couple of adoring books about Kerry and Clinton. I hope Bush's new appointee to head of the National Archives (although I think the Dems are balking at approving him, even though he's a non-political appointee with plenty of non-profit experience) makes some changes there, not only in their security policies but in their hard-left political pamphleteering.
Thanks for the link.
"John Freakin' Kerry"
Kerry = Ultimate word in the phrase
Freakin' = Penultimate word
John = Antepenultimate Word
The terms and their distinctions are important for knowing where to put an accent mark in some languages.
See my tagline, please.
Heheh.....nice........I'll second the motion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.