Skip to comments.
Saudi royal family lambasts Michael Moore for twisting the truth in his 9/11 film
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 1st August 2004
| Con Coughlin
Posted on 07/31/2004 6:19:17 PM PDT by KangarooJacqui
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: cincysux
41
posted on
08/01/2004 7:07:21 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: WideGlide
My friend... 280 lbs.? Youve got to be kidding me, try 380...
To: WideGlide
Oh, OK, so you take the side of the Saudis over an American exercising his right to free speech. Let's review the tape: 15 of the 19 Cheneying murdering bastards were Saudi Cheneying nationals. The next Cheneying time you even think about siding with these Cheneying boy sodomizers pack your bags and leave and enjoy the buggering.
43
posted on
08/01/2004 7:37:19 AM PDT
by
Archangelsk
(Laura Croft is a geek's wet dream and nothing more.)
To: All
Libs claim that the Bush family are friends and business partners with the Saudi Royal Family. How can I prove this wrong? I need some facts to disprove this BS.
Thanks much guys
44
posted on
08/01/2004 9:29:29 AM PDT
by
Teplukin
To: Archangelsk
So all Saudis should have been detained against their will? Oh and let me guess, the Arabs that were detained for investigation was a grave human rights violation?
Replacing the F-Bomb with Cheney? Go back to DU.
45
posted on
08/01/2004 9:37:33 AM PDT
by
chudogg
(www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
To: KangarooJacqui
Here is an old article full of interesting information on the subject of the Saudi Royal flight at the time.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1150593/posts
To: chudogg
I don't know even where to begin, numbnuts, let's just say that you're about as way off base as you can possibly imagine.
47
posted on
08/01/2004 10:16:33 AM PDT
by
Archangelsk
(Laura Croft is a geek's wet dream and nothing more.)
To: KangarooJacqui
The Saudis should sue Moore's fat butt good, and hopefully lighten his pocket by a considerable and painful amount. That's the only way to stop Michael Moore.
48
posted on
08/01/2004 10:25:21 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
To: KangarooJacqui
does moore have secret service protection yet?
49
posted on
08/01/2004 10:26:29 AM PDT
by
alrea
(Owing to a lack of visibility banners and flags are made: Sun Tzu)
To: Archangelsk
50
posted on
08/01/2004 10:38:13 AM PDT
by
chudogg
(www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
To: Archangelsk
ROFLMAO. I can't remember any moron stupid enough to associate Michael Moore and exercising in the same sentence. While I usually follow the FR rules and avoid personal attacks, an exception is required in your case. The unimaginative Cheney reference is typical of the innuendo you and your fat-assed fag hero Moore pass off for free speech. Interesting that you don't accord the same free speech rights to people who hold views opposite of yours. You bore me Fagangel. In the words of a great American practicing his right to free speech, "FU*K OFF A$$HOLE."
51
posted on
08/01/2004 10:52:08 AM PDT
by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson