No, I don't want to believe a case is being pressed that is baseless.
So far, the spinning persuades me to remain skeptical--of the defense.
Whatever base it had is gone cyn.
How can Kobe ever be proven guilty
when his accuser had sex with another
male AFTER her encounter with Kobe, but
BEFORE she submitted herself to the rape kit exam?
She has 3 individual sets of DNA, and Kobe's is
miniscule. The other guy (the one after Kobe)
left his DNA on her legs and other body parts
for crying out loud. His was fresh.
This is not spin, it's fact.