To: Howlin
that's the problem when you have sex with somebody after an incident you claim was rape. If she did. I've always said I would not convict if she did because of the many questions and implications it obviously raises. As far as I can see, it is far from demonstrated she was with someone after Bryant.
87 posted on
08/03/2004 5:48:13 PM PDT by
cyncooper
("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
To: cyncooper
see posts above about sperm sequence. Much more of mr 'x's
88 posted on
08/03/2004 5:49:49 PM PDT by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: cyncooper; Howlin
A victim's right's advocate, on O'Reilly just now, said that rape victims often have sex soon after a rape in order to "normalize" the rape.
No joke. She really said that.
It goes against one's intuitive reaction, and everything else I've heard from married rape victims, who often shun their husbands for a long time.
I don't believe a jury would buy this story.
92 posted on
08/03/2004 5:51:36 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(It is time to breed the dangerous Pit Bull Terrier out of existence!)
To: cyncooper
Then how do you explain the fact that her DNA and Kobe's DNA were found on Kobe, but not Mr. X's?
Because if the sex was before Kobe, it stands to reason that if it was still in her the day of the rape exam, then it was in her when she claims Kobe raped her.
96 posted on
08/03/2004 5:54:27 PM PDT by
Howlin
(Saving Private Hamster)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson