Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
that's the problem when you have sex with somebody after an incident you claim was rape.

If she did. I've always said I would not convict if she did because of the many questions and implications it obviously raises. As far as I can see, it is far from demonstrated she was with someone after Bryant.

87 posted on 08/03/2004 5:48:13 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper

see posts above about sperm sequence. Much more of mr 'x's


88 posted on 08/03/2004 5:49:49 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper; Howlin
A victim's right's advocate, on O'Reilly just now, said that rape victims often have sex soon after a rape in order to "normalize" the rape.

No joke. She really said that.

It goes against one's intuitive reaction, and everything else I've heard from married rape victims, who often shun their husbands for a long time.

I don't believe a jury would buy this story.

92 posted on 08/03/2004 5:51:36 PM PDT by sinkspur (It is time to breed the dangerous Pit Bull Terrier out of existence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: cyncooper

Then how do you explain the fact that her DNA and Kobe's DNA were found on Kobe, but not Mr. X's?

Because if the sex was before Kobe, it stands to reason that if it was still in her the day of the rape exam, then it was in her when she claims Kobe raped her.


96 posted on 08/03/2004 5:54:27 PM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson