Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.


Posted on 08/03/2004 3:32:12 PM PDT by swilhelm73

Our century is noted for its absolute and bloody wars. World War I saw nine-million people killed in battle, an incredi ble record that was far surpassed within a few decades by the 15 million battle deaths of World War II. Even the number killed in twentieth century revolutions and civil wars have set historical records. In total, this century's battle killed in all its international and domestic wars, revolutions, and violent conflicts is so far about 35,654,000.

Yet, even more unbelievable than these vast numbers killed in war during the lifetime of some still living, and largely unknown, is this shocking fact. This century's total killed by absolutist governments already far exceeds that for all wars, domestic and international. Indeed, this number already approximates the number that might be killed in a nuclear war.

Table 1 provides the relevant totals and classifies these by type of government (following Freedom House's definitions) and war. By government killed is meant any direct or indirect killing by government officials, or government acquiescence in the killing by others, of more than 1,000 people, except execution for what are conventionally considered criminal acts (murder, rape, spying, treason, and the like). This killing is apart from the pursuit of any ongoing military action or campaign, or as part of any conflict event. For example, the Jews that Hitler slaughtered during World War II would be counted, since their merciless and systematic killing was unrelated to and actually conflicted with Hitler's pursuit of the war.

The totals in the Table are based on a nation-by-nation assessment and are absolute minimal figures that may under estimate the true total by ten percent or more. Moreover, these figures do not even include the 1921-1922 and 1958-1961 famines in the Soviet Union and China causing about 4 million and 27 million dead, respectably. The former famine was mainly due to the imposition of a command agricultural economy, forced requisitions of food by the Soviets, and the liquidation campaigns of the Cheka; the latter was wholly caused by Mao's agriculturally destructive Great Leap Forward and collectivization.

However, Table 1 does include the Soviet government's planned and administered starvation of the Ukraine begun in 1932 as a way of breaking peasant opposition to collectivization and destroying Ukrainian nationalism. As many as ten million may have been starved to death or succumbed to famine related diseases; I estimate eight million died. Had these people all been shot, the Soviet government's moral responsibility could be no greater.

The Table lists 831 thousand people killed by free -- democratic -- governments, which should startle most readers. This figure involves the French massacres in Algeria before and during the Algerian war (36,000 killed, at a minimum), and those killed by the Soviets after being forcibly repatriated to them by the Allied Democracies during and after World War II.

It is outrageous that in line with and even often surpassing in zeal the letter of the Yalta Agreement signed by Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, the Allied Democracies, particularly Great Britain and the United States, turned over to Soviet authorities more than 2,250,000 Soviet citizens, prisoners of war, and Russian exiles (who were not Soviet citizens) found in the Allied zones of occupation in Europe. Most of these people were terrified of the consequences of repatriation and refused to cooperate in their repatriation; often whole families preferred suicide. Of those the Allied Democracies repatriation, an estimated 795,000 were executed, or died in slave-labor camps or in transit to them.

If a government is to be held responsible for those prisoners who die in freight cars or in their camps from privation, surely those democratic governments that turned helpless people over to totalitarian rulers with foreknowledge of their peril, also should be held responsible.

Concerning now the overall mortality statistics shown in the table, it is sad that hundreds of thousands of people can be killed by governments with hardly an international murmur, while a war killing several thousand people can cause an immediate world outcry and global reaction. Simply contrast the international focus on the relatively minor Falkland Islands War of Britain and Argentina with the widescale lack of interest in Burundi's killing or acquiescence in such killing of about 100,000 Hutu in 1972, of Indonesia slaughtering a likely 600,000 "communists" in 1965, and of Pakistan, in an initially well planned massacre, eventually killing from one to three million Bengalis in 1971.

A most noteworthy and still sensitive example of this double standard is the Vietnam War. The international community was outraged at the American attempt to militarily prevent North Vietnam from taking over South Vietnam and ultimately Laos and Cambodia. "Stop the killing" was the cry, and eventually, the pressure of foreign and domestic opposition forced an American withdrawal. The overall number killed in the Vietnam War on all sides was about 1,216,000 people.

With the United States subsequently refusing them even modest military aid, South Vietnam was militarily defeated by the North and completely swallowed; and Cambodia was taken over by the communist Khmer Rouge, who in trying to recreate a primitive communist agricultural society slaughtered from one to three million Cambodians. If we take a middle two-million as the best estimate, then in four years the government of this small nation of seven million alone killed 64 percent more people than died in the ten-year Vietnam War.

Overall, the best estimate of those killed after the Vietnam War by the victorious communists in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia is 2,270,000. Now totaling almost twice as many as died in the Vietnam War, this communist killing still continues.

To view this double standard from another perspective, both World Wars cost twenty-four million battle deaths. But from 1918 to 1953, the Soviet government executed, slaughtered, starved, beat or tortured to death, or otherwise killed 39,500,000 of its own people (my best estimate among figures ranging from a minimum of twenty million killed by Stalin to a total over the whole communist period of eighty-three million). For China under Mao Tse-tung, the communist government eliminated, as an average figure between estimates, 45,000,000 Chinese. The number killed for just these two nations is about 84,500,000 human beings, or a lethality of 252 percent more than both World Wars together. Yet, have the world community and intellectuals generally shown anything like the same horror, the same outrage, the same out pouring of anti-killing literature, over these Soviet and Chinese megakillings as has been directed at the much less deadly World Wars?

As can be seen from Table 1, communist governments are overall almost four times more lethal to their citizens than non-communist ones, and in per capita terms nearly twice as lethal (even considering the huge populations of the USSR and China).

However, as large as the per capita killed is for communist governments, it is nearly the same as for other non-free governments. This is due to the massacres and widescale killing in the very small country of East Timor, where since 1975 Indonesia has eliminated (aside from the guerrilla war and associated violence) an estimated 100 thousand Timorese out of a population of 600 thousand. Omitting this country alone would reduce the average killed by noncommunist, nonfree governments to 397 per 10,000, or significantly less than the 477 per 10,000 for communist countries.

In any case, we can still see from the table that the more freedom in a nation, the fewer people killed by government. Freedom acts to brake the use of a governing elite's power over life and death to pursue their policies and ensure their rule.

This principle appeared to be violated in two aforementioned special cases. One was the French government carrying out mass killing in the colony of Algeria, where compared to Frenchmen the Algerians were second class citizens, without the right to vote in French elections. In the other case the Allied Democracies acted during and just after wartime, under strict secrecy, to turn over foreigners to a communist government. These foreigners, of course, had no rights as citizens that would protect them in the democracies. In no case have I found a democratic government carrying out massacres, genocide, and mass executions of its own citizens; nor have I found a case where such a government's policies have knowingly and directly resulted in the large scale deaths of its people though privation, torture, beatings, and the like.

Absolutism is not only many times deadlier than war, but itself is the major factor causing war and other forms of violent conflict. It is a major cause of militarism. Indeed, absolutism, not war, is mankind's deadliest scourge of all.

In light of all this, the peaceful, nonviolent, pursuit and fostering of civil liberties and political rights must be made mankind's highest humanitarian goal. Not simply to give the greatest number the greatest happiness, not simply to obey the moral imperative of individual rights, not simply to further the efficiency and productivity of a free society, but also and mainly because freedom preserves peace and life.

TOPICS: Philosophy
KEYWORDS: deathtoll; rummel
An oldy but a goodie. 6426
1 posted on 08/03/2004 3:32:13 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Seems to me that abortion as a form of birth control has killed more people than anything else...

2 posted on 08/03/2004 3:35:48 PM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Shouln't that be, "last century's biggest killer"?

3 posted on 08/03/2004 3:38:33 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Look at the published date.

4 posted on 08/03/2004 3:39:07 PM PDT by swilhelm73 (When Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq, his son murdered 2,000 people in the Abu Gharib prison in *one* day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; swilhelm73

Whoops. This is a repeat of a 1986 article. Never mind.

5 posted on 08/03/2004 3:40:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Sex is this century's biggest killer. Add up deaths from abortion, aids, homocides due to adultry or cheating, and other sexually transmitted diseases. I would bet the numbers are staggering. Sex is a killer. I have nothing against making love. It is the MOST beautiful gift God gave us, but "sex" has devestated this century.

6 posted on 08/03/2004 3:41:33 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

"Table 1"

7 posted on 08/03/2004 3:42:35 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
oldie but goodie but missing tables that are referenced ... kinda key to understanding the article (see table 1 below). Interesting writeup, but I would think that the centuries biggest killer is actually abortion ... just sort of scan read this so far, but I don't see any reference to that genocide contained in this article ... sad if it isn't. Was '86 too soon for abortion statistics to be known to be as bad as they are?

8 posted on 08/03/2004 3:44:27 PM PDT by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Over 3000 Murdered babies every day comes out to over 30 million in America alone. AND, not one of the enemy was killed or even punished - at least not in this world.

9 posted on 08/03/2004 3:46:00 PM PDT by TomasUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Abortion (in the US) has resulted in about 45M deaths. I have no idea about worldwide, but you may be onto something.

10 posted on 08/03/2004 3:49:22 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Yes, Rummel's number for death by government are higher then the figures I've seen for abortions.

The Soviets alone weigh in at around twice as many government murders as there have been abortions in the US.

11 posted on 08/03/2004 3:50:49 PM PDT by swilhelm73 (When Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq, his son murdered 2,000 people in the Abu Gharib prison in *one* day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

It was Roosevelt's and Truman policies to force people who had escaped the clutches of Stalin back to Russia and their deaths.

12 posted on 08/03/2004 3:59:58 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

As soon as I saw the headline, I was sure that the high scorer would be ABORTION!

Thanks for the statistic.....

13 posted on 08/03/2004 4:02:44 PM PDT by spoiler2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: spoiler2

I ran across this number on-line, so it must be accurate...

Those with agendas often "shade" statistics to suit their goals. Even those with, IMHO, righteous goals.

I have no idea whether 45M is accurate. I believe I've seen estimates everywhere from about 25-45M. I'm not sure anybody has truly accurate numbers.

14 posted on 08/03/2004 4:07:01 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

I think China topped 100M forced abortions a year or so ago if I remember correctly.

15 posted on 08/03/2004 4:09:17 PM PDT by sc2_ct (This is the way the world ends... not with a bang but a whimper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

15 million battle deaths of World War II

That's an awfully low estimate. The term "battle deaths" has to be pretty narrowly defined to come up with 15 million out of 70 million

16 posted on 08/03/2004 4:20:38 PM PDT by Damagro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Great article. Too bad they don't teach this in the schools( America is the source of all evil in the world according to US educators).

You shouldn't confuse people by posting these statistics. The most important issue is health care don't cha know. Everyone in Cuba has health care. They have a better health system than we do- Jimmy Carter says so.( SHSHSHHHHHHhhhhhh!!!! don't tell anyone its a Communist dictatorship). John Kerry is for Universal health care. Vote for Kerry so we can be like Cuba! Yaye!

Socialists endorse Kerry

U.S Communists for Kerry

Red China wants Kerry for president

17 posted on 08/03/2004 4:49:22 PM PDT by fly_so_free (Never underestimate the treachery of the democrat party- Save USA,-Vote a Dem out of office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fly_so_free

You forgot NAMBLA!

18 posted on 08/03/2004 4:58:12 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: swilhelm73
I'm giving this thread a long overdue BTTT because there has been so much discussion about the 2nd amendment lately. If the Chinese and Ukrainian peasants who were starved by their Communist masters had been armed, the results would have been quite different then they were.

This is the meaning and reason for the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Because our founders knew that the most likely threat to our well being was not some far off nation or a group of psychotic religious zealots, but our own government, and they wanted to empower us to resist it if it became necessary.

The author's estimates state that in the 20th century, roughly 36,654,000 people were killed in wars,but a breathtaking 169,202,000 were killed by their own government in the 20th century. The author is a liberal academic who is somewhat fast and loose with how attributes responsibility for the deaths, but this is all the more reason to believe and understand the relevant data.

20 posted on 03/16/2007 8:59:02 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson