Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Legion04

Kerry is a "public figure", meaning there has to be actual malice to sue for defamation I believe.

That's nearly impossible, since no one can establish who is telling the truth, Kerry or the Swift Vets.

It's he said/they said.

No libel, no slander, no defamation under the law.

Kerry is trying to destroy the First Amendment and free speech in this country. He is dangerous.


45 posted on 08/05/2004 1:02:25 PM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: tomahawk
Maybe it has to do with "privilege":
ANY DEFAMATORY STATEMENT THAT CAN'T BE PROVEN TRUE AND WASN'T TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM A PUBLIC RECORD OR GOVERNMENT PROCEEDING HAS TO BE CONSIDERED DANGEROUS TO PRINT.

In writing about trials and arrests, make sure you check the record. Before the person is found guilty, always use words like "alleged" or "accused." In America, everyone is considered innocent before proven guilty.

Associated Press Style and Libel Guide.

Dictionary libel

You are right, it is EXTREMELY difficult to find slander or libel on a public person, including politicians. Curious situation. Both sides have legal teams. Where's a lawyer when you need one--- to explain this! ;)

79 posted on 08/05/2004 1:47:03 PM PDT by exhaustedmomma (“John Kerry has fought harder for the Vietnamese communists than he fought against them in Vietnam.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson