The party is irrelevant. Always has been.
The point is, when you push your bad apples off onto another group, you expose yourself to the same nonsense.
It's the same thing as putting the picture of the whacko blue guy up everytime some childish poster wants to discredit libertarians.
So it comes full circle, but some people just don't get it.
And then they accuse other freepers of embracing pornography.
posted on 08/10/2004 11:26:37 AM PDT
(" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
The party is irrelevant. Always has been. The point is, when you push your bad apples off onto another group, you expose yourself to the same nonsense.
But I couldn't disagree more. A party is as relative as its platform. I'm not even sure I know exactly what you meant there, so I should probably wait for clarification before ranting.
One man's bad apple is another man's pie filling. You're accusing Republicans of trying to push a "bad apple" out...what makes him a bad apple to Republicans? (Well, aside from the child porn charges that were later dropped - but we've barely been talking about those.)
Would he be considered a bad apple to Libertarians? To libertarians?
posted on 08/10/2004 11:37:13 AM PDT
(I'm usually either right or wrong.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson