And now, in the "For What It's Worth" department...
There are changes here on the border, but it's looking like too little, too late. Time - and lost lives - will tell.
Posted on 08/10/2004 6:04:26 PM PDT by neverdem
WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 — Citing concerns about terrorists crossing the nation's land borders, the Department of Homeland Security announced today that it planned to give border patrol agents sweeping new powers to deport illegal aliens from the frontiers abutting Mexico and Canada without providing the aliens the opportunity to make their case before an immigration judge.
The move, which will take effect this month, represents a broad expansion of the authority of the thousands of law enforcement agents who currently patrol the nation's borders. Until now, border patrol agents typically delivered undocumented immigrants to the custody of the immigration courts, where judges determined whether they should be deported or remain in the United States.
Homeland Security officials described the immigration courts — which hear pleas for asylum and other appeals to remain in the country — as sluggish and cumbersome, saying illegal immigrants often wait more than a year before being deported, straining the capacity of detention centers and draining critical resources. Under the new system, immigrants will typically be deported within eight days of their apprehension, officials said.
Immigration legislation passed in 1996 allows the immigration service to deport certain groups of illegal aliens without judicial oversight, but until now the agency only permitted officials at the nation's airports and seaports to do so. The new rule will apply to illegal aliens caught within 100 miles of the Mexican and Canadian borders who have spent 14 days or less within the United States. The border agents will focus on deporting third-country nationals, rather than Mexicans or Canadians, and they are expected to begin exercising their new powers on Aug. 24 in Tucson and Laredo, Tex.
"There is a concern that as we tighten the security of our ports of entry through our biometric checks that there will be more opportunity or more effort made by terrorists to enter our country through our vast land borders," Asa Hutchinson, the undersecretary for border security at the Department of Homeland Security, said at a news conference.
"We recognize that we have to secure those and that's the president's first principle of immigration reform," Mr. Hutchinson said. "America must secure its borders and this is a part of that effort."
The decision was hailed by officials who have long complained that the nation's porous borders represent a serious threat to national security. But it prompted a flurry of criticism from advocates for immigrants who warned that the new system lacked adequate safeguards to ensure that people fleeing persecution, American citizens lacking paperwork or other travelers with legitimate grounds would not be improperly deported.
Mr. Hutchinson said that border agents would be trained on asylum law and that immigrants who demonstrated a credible fear of persecution would be sent to see immigrant judges, not returned to hostile governments. "That right," he said of the right to apply for asylum, "is very important."
But Homeland Security officials provided little details about the training, and advocates said that they feared that mistakes would be made when border agents decide who will be deported and who will not, often in the vast, inhospitable plains of the southern deserts.
Beat me to it - Drudge is running the headline now. Looks like the RNC got my letter LOL.
From time to time, I’ll post or ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. Let me know if you want off my list.
Makes me wonder, do they now have power to return fire?
ABOUT TIME.....
The "except for Mexicans" is a hole big enough through which to herd a million illegals a year.
The Times wrote the same title as Rueters with its own byline.
Spackidagoosh,
I asked the admin moderator to run your post as breaking news, but I didn't see any response.
We already have an average of one guard per 1/5th mile of Southern border, but they are spending most of their time processing people who just want to come here to do our dirtiest lowest paying jobs.
Something stinks about this story. Bush is in Vicente Fox's back pocket and has resisted any move to enforce the immigration laws or secure the borders. Fox has routinely pushed illegals across our border and has pressured Bush to pretend that we don't have a southern border.
I'm very susicious of this. I think it's a plant to make us think that the administration is actually going to do something about illegal immigration when, in fact, I don't think they are.
Hutchinson is supposed to be in CA Friday to talk about the stoppage of sweeps of Mexical illegals. We'll see what he says. But this doesn't address the Mexicans at the border, and illegals living illegally.
Yup, this article almost fooled me on first glance. We sure don't want get Vincente mad at us, do we?
It is about time. One small step in a lot of steps that need to be taken to tighten the borders both by land and by sea.
"One small step in a lot of steps that need to be taken to tighten the borders both by land and by sea."
Yes, I agree, at least this is a step in the right direction.
Folks, I'm not sure if you realize this or not, but a number of the middle-eastern people who are coming through Mexico have been given Mexican style clothes and appear to be Mexicans. If they keep their mouths shut, who will know if they are Mexican or not? Not knowing, are we really assured they INS (or whatever) will deport those folks to the middle-east?
LOL, how gullible to they think we are? Asa still refuses to allow inland apprehensions in populated areas.
This is all about smoke and mirrors. Remember, any police department of municipality can opt out of these programs, just as LA now refuses to even ask a person's status, or take them into custody for the INS.
We have laws on the books today that are supposed to stop illegal immigration dead in it's tracks. Does it?
Asa is leading you folks down the primrose path. Don't sucker for it.
Fix illegal immigration accross the board today, and quit f---ing with us, you a--holes in D.C.
Sounds like a plan to ticket all speeders, except drivers who have been exceeding the speed limit for more than 14 minutes.
"How long have you been in the country?"
"15 days"
"Okay, we'll put you you through the same old inefficient system we always use then."
And now, in the "For What It's Worth" department...
There are changes here on the border, but it's looking like too little, too late. Time - and lost lives - will tell.
I wonder if the ACLU will require the painting of a broad green line 100 miles from the border to indicate where the "get home free" zone starts?
" Bush is in Vicente Fox's back pocket "
According to the AP your post is hyperbole and... can we get a quote on your views of the Catholic Church?
Remember the Alamo!
Let's hope they're finally getting serious, but I'll believe it when I see it.
It looks as if terrorists make it past the 14 day deadline, they are free to bomb you on the 15th day.
Union members who assume that people will pay them $35 an hour to do the jobs that immigrants are doing for $8 an hour are living in the past when our living standards were lower and they could coerce employers into paying exorbitant wages. But times have changed. Consumers will simply cut back on non necessary expenditures and postpone buying a new car or house rather than pay twice the price.
Without increasing immigrant labor our economy would contract, new factories would be built overseas and our living standard would drop. You should be thankful that you are living in the greatest period of economic prosperity in history.
If you are just sitting around waiting for the government to take a job away from an immigrant and give it to you, you're going to be waiting a long time.
Suddenly -- Three months till the election '04 -- Homeland Security has "concerns about terrorists crossing the nation's land border"??
Are these people aware yet that Pearl Harbor has been attacked?
Ping.
Well, isn't that nice.
Consider your soul, bayourod, if not your freedom.
Since you have no real respect for law as a societal concept, why do you expect anyone else to abide only by the ones you approve and profit from?
Perhaps the ones I am inclined to ignore are ones that profit myself, and might tend to cause you great harm.
Since we are both seemingly free to ignore the laws of society,in your opinion, it seems you advocate anarchy.
Be carefull what you wish for, you might actually get it.
And if you're 101 miles from the border, you're home free.
|
This may seem like a step in the right direction but what it actually does is take away punishment for illegally crossing the border. Instead of spending time in jail they will be expedited to their country of origin. We already have something like this in place for illegals returning after deportation. Prior deports used to spend time incarcerated. Now they get no jail time unless there are mitigating factors like having numerous felonies.
Ping
That's a great idea. Talk about a dilemma for the goverment though, more money vs. enforcing immigration laws. Something tells me they might go for the money.
That statement right there would leave out the 29 illegals found in an 18 wheeler in Fort Worth just this past week. One hundred miles leaves out any that get to my city!!
So the little 'shack cities' will start developing 100 miles from the borders now.
There will always be someone to game the system.
"This may seem like a step in the right direction but what it actually does is take away punishment..."
Good point. I didn't realise that illegals were being held for as long as a year. And yet, we still have this major problem.
"Without increasing immigrant labor our economy would contract..."
Please don't get the following comparison wrong. Your argument is for more global freedom, not less. But economically speaking, history disagrees.
The South said the same thing about slavery. 'Without slaves, where would agriculture go? It would no longer be profitable. Bla-bla-bla.' Same argument.
You took the words right out of my mouth. The article started out good but.......
This is a farce with a potential for NUMEROUS discrimination lawsuits.
BUMP
BTW Illegals have no right to a lawyer AT THE BORDER. This has been the rule loooooooong before 9/11.
Most major metropolitan airports have immigration courts with a judge ON PREMISIS.
THIS IS GOOD.
BTWW: Most ALL who are stopped at the airports go back voluntarily.
A good beginning, but unfortunately, Mexican illegal invaders are exempted from this edict.
About dayum time!
Frontiers? Fontiers? What about those in El Paso (population 563,000), Laredo (pop 176,000), and McAllen (pop 132,000) where that woman was arrested the other day. FYI, there are border patrol offices in nearly every big city in the US no matter if it's in the middle of Kansas.
Yep.
Make me feel warm and fuzzy just reading it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.