The ombudsman represents the readers. Her opinions and conclusions are her own. Phone 617-929-3020 or, to leave a message, 929-3022. Our e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
Distinction without a difference.
No credibility. I don't believe a word these people say.
Let the spin begin...
Different books, same ethical breach.
[ snip ]
Globe Editor Martin Baron noted that earlier this summer Kranish worked with PublicAffairs -- the publisher of the Boston Globe biography of Kerry, "John F. Kerry: The Complete Biography by the Boston Globe Reporters Who Know Him Best" -- to write a short introduction to a second project: an independent, unauthorized review of publicly available documents dealing with the platform and policy statements of Kerry and Edwards. That project was in no way connected with the Kerry-Edwards campaign, Baron said......
.....When PublicAffairs subsequently struck an agreement with the Kerry campaign to do an official campaign book, Kranish's relationship with the project immediately ended," Baron said.
Peter Osnos, publisher of PublicAffairs, said both Drudge and Amazon, the online bookseller peddling the upcoming Kerry-Edwards book, had made a mistake in suggesting Kranish had written its introduction.
"As far as I can tell, if there's any malign intent here, it was someone making Drudge think Michael was somehow doing something for [Kerry's] campaign," Osnos said.
The Globe book, "John F. Kerry: The Complete Biography," is an unauthorized biography. The work draws on extensive interviews with the candidate, all conducted before 2004. After he emerged as the presumptive Democratic nominee, Kerry declined to cooperate with further interviews.
Amazon, the online bookseller, apparently contributed to the confusion with a listing for the Kerry-approved campaign book indicating Kranish as the author. PublicAffairs' officials said yesterday that Amazon had agreed to revise the listing immediately.
Kerry campaign spokesman Michael Meehan said Kranish had no connection to the campaign.
Including Kranish's name imprinted on the book jacket? Either the site was hacked - in which case why isn't this article saying so? - or someone here is covering up the truth. As it stands the BG has ZERO credibility.
Did George Orwell have this covered in '1984' or what? Revisionist history at its best!
Why should I believe the Boston Globe, or any other Kerry media outlet for that matter?
I've always thought the book Kranish was ostensibly "really" hired to write the forward to sounds suspiciously Kerry campaign-esque.
Does he want to reveal who commissioned yon book, "Kerry and Edwards: Their Plans and Promises", and what their relationship IS to the Kerry campaign. Sounds like another definition of "is" to me.
Besides, I think Kranish's forward was included in the Kerry campaign propaganda piece. See the Barnes and Noble website:
Michael Kranish has worked for the Boston Globe for more than 20 years, including the last 16 in the newspaper's Washington Bureau. He is co-author of John F. Kerry: The Complete Biography (PublicAffairs, 2004).
Yeah because that's the political book the publishing world has been anticipating for years. It was only the selection of Kerry/Edwards as the Pres/VP candidates that scuppered that plan.
Our Plan for America: Stronger at Home, Respected in the World
Table of Contents
Introduction by Michael Kranish
John Kerry on the Issues
100 Days to Change America
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMY AND JOBS
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
LGBT (Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transgender)
PROTECTING AMERICA'S WORKERS
Campaign biography of John Kerry
Campaign biography of John Edwards
John Kerry's Announcement Speech
Responsible journalists pursued the story past pat denials. They ended up deciding even with all the weird discrepancies that Kranish was clean. It was not at all "bad journalism," it was real journalism, as opposed to fellating the Democrats.
And how in the HELL is this supposed to assure us of Kranish's objective reporting skills? What is this nonsense? Does the GLOBE think EVERYONE is STUPID? Or do they just not care? What in the HELL does NOT taking money from the campaign coffers have to do with BIAS?