Posted on 08/21/2004 9:06:29 AM PDT by wdkeller
Perhaps your Buchanan obsession is becoming something more serious. Try to calm yourself.
LOL! There you go again...elevating yourself and your idol to a status far more then you really hold. Remember the pocket of puss on the frenchman's arse...grasp that thought and you'll be getting close to the level of esteem and importance you actually hold.
You sound just like the bogus radio callers who claim to be a Republican but aren't going to vote for Bush for one reason or another. Go tell it to someone who cares.
Also other threads showing that the Swift boat assignment/mission was changed to the hazardous patrolling we are familiar with after Kerry volunteered for Swift boat duty.
This would no doubt be helpful for this newbie who left out that Kerry is also the only one of the two candidates who turned on his "band of brothers" when he returned to the states and he's also the only one of the two candidates who travelled to Hanoi and has his picture hanging in a Communist Museum there. And the only one of the two candidates who "gave the enemy for free" what too many of our POWs "took torture to avoid saying".
I'm not kidding. Your hatred for this Buchanan guy seems to be causing you extreme mental stress.
Kerry spent four months fighting the war, then years fighting the vets...now he's suddenly proud of that four months and is fighting the vets again...along with his willing allies.
To an increasing number of Kool-Aid drinking, mind numbed, yeller-dawg Pubbies on this forum, the answer is yes. Don't think for yourself, don't question anyone with an "R" after their name, check your principles at the door
__________________________________________________________
No I think it is more reasonable to do what you did. I think one should pick a couple of issue where Bush did the same thing that Reagan did, like say buget deficits and immigration policy, and then claim you have to sit this one out because Reagan was the last conservative GOP nominee and EVENTHOUGH REAGAN DID THESE VERY THINGS YOU OBJECT TO conclude that Bush just is not conservative enough for you.
I am certainly not telling you, you must vote to Bush. I am merely pointing out to you that your reasoning is flawed.
There are many reasons a person like you might want to vote for someone else or not vote. You could be a high tax statists like say Buchanan and want higher taxes. You could be a immigration statist and demand no immigrants. [Keep in mind you either have to accept immigrants coming to the US or goods potential immigrants make in their own country coming to the US or are yet again being inconsistent.] You could want the government to take a higher percentage of every Americans production [ie income.] You could have lots of views. Few might call them conservative. But words like conservative and liberal are often misused and if you want the government to take more of our production, stop of free exchange of goods, stop people from living where they want, I guess you can all yourself conservative. I would call you a statist one calling for more and more state intervention in our lives.
They certainly might, given an I.Q. low enough.
... and, speaking of inordinately stupid individuals: here's the definition of the word "censor." Plainly, it doesn't mean what you want it to mean.
Keep squeaking.
Pull your head out of the dark and musty, take some deep breaths and resume your vegetative state....calm....calm....calm.
Almost.
No I don't. :)
Almost forgot, vote David G Reichert in November.
It does not require a high IQ to cross out someone elses opinion simply because it does not agree with yours.
Dude? Perhaps you should get some pills.
So.........have we determined if mr keller is a troll, or just a stupid person??
No need. But thanks for the medical advice. I'll hold it in the same esteem as your political advise.
(Note to self...print out eski-moo's words and put them to appropriate use. Remember, print it on soft paper!)
The poor fellow has ice on his brain, CWO......be merciful.
I am...that's why I reminded myself to print his thoughts out on soft paper. I'd prefer two ply but it jams in the printer.
Wayne, if you can't back Bush, that's your thing, but why punish the state and local candidates if they are good people? That makes no sense whatsoever.
If I can't vote for someone at the top of the ticket, I'm not going to punish my local reps who do a good job for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.