Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editors Grapple With How to Cover Swift Boat Controversy
Editor and Publisher Magazine ^ | August 24, 2004 | By Joe Strupp

Posted on 08/24/2004 6:31:01 AM PDT by viewfromafar

NEW YORK As the John Kerry swift boat controversy navigates itself from the shoreline of the 2004 presidential campaign into the mainstream, newspapers face a dilemma of how to report on the attacks against the Democratic nominee without giving them undue credibility or blowing the issue out of proportion.

Alison Mitchell, deputy national editor for The New York Times (Click for QuikCap), points to the changing media landscape and its impact on what newspapers choose to cover. "I'm not sure that in an era of no-cable television we would even have looked into it," she said.

But Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. said newspapers can still drive their own agenda. "I don't think we are lessening at all our judgment of the news," he told E&P. "There is much more media, but we still judge for ourselves which facts we report in The Washington Post."

In the past week, Page One stories have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today and other dailies both scrutinizing the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and its accusations against Kerry, while also reporting on the effect the group's advertising is having on the Democrat's strategy.

Since Kerry chose to alter his policy and approach the group's criticism head-on, editors contend that made the story ripe for front-page coverage. But some of the coverage has lapsed into the "he said, she said" variety.

"Kerry has made his Vietnam service a centerpiece of the Democratic National Convention and the Swift Boat Veterans came out right after that," said Lee Horwich, politics editor at USA Today, which ran a story about the veterans group, and inconsistencies in its accounts, on Aug. 16. "There has been doubt cast on some of their charges and we have reported it. I think scrutiny of the accuracy of the charges has been the thrust of the coverage."

James O'Shea, managing editor of the Chicago Tribune, agreed. But he said the critical approach may have been a bit late, considering that the Swift Boat Veterans ads came out two weeks ago. "I don't think there has been enough scrutiny until now," he said. "Prior to this, we weren't giving it enough attention."

But O'Shea also pointed out that giving the anti-Kerry veterans too much attention, in an attempt to hold them accountable, creates a situation of ignoring other issues. He said this may be an instance of a growing problem for newspapers in the expanding media world -- being forced to follow a story they might not consider worthwhile because other news outlets (in this case, Fox News and talk radio) have made it an issue.

"There are too many places for people to get information," O'Shea said. "I don't think newspapers can be the gatekeepers anymore -- to say this is wrong and we will ignore it. Now we have to say this is wrong, and here is why."

Downie said he believes the Swift Boat Veterans coverage had been fair and properly scrutinizing. "We have printed the facts and some of those facts have undermined Kerry's opponents," he said. "We are not judging the credibility of Kerry or the (Swift Boat) Veterans, we just print the facts."

He defended a lengthy Post story that ran Sunday which appeared to give equal credibility to both Kerry's version of the events in Vietnam (which is supported by his crewmates and largely backed up by a paper trail) and the Swift Boat Veterans, despite the fact that previous stories in the Post and the New York Times had debunked many of the group's accounts.

On Monday, Michael Tomaskey, writing for The American Prospect's Web site, took issue with Downie's decision: "The Washington Post should not even be running such a story ... in the first place. Len Downie and the paper's other editors would undoubtedly argue that the story represents the Post's tenacity for getting to the truth, without fear or favor. But what the story actually proves is that a bunch of liars who have in the past contradicted their own current statements can, if their lies are outrageous enough and if they have enough money, control the media agenda and get even the most respected media outlets in the country to focus on picayune 'truths' while missing the larger story."

The swift boat controversy and its coverage have also provided fodder for ombudsmen during the past few days. Paul Moore at The Sun in Baltimore cited the need for reporting to include all aspects of the veterans group's activities. "News stories about this group are legitimate, but because the group's televised ads have been paid for by supporters of President Bush, the partisan nature of the material is unmistakable," he wrote.

Dennis Ryerson, editor of The Indianapolis Star, also weighed in with a column about the challenges of the story. "The media are caught in the middle," he opined. "We are often criticized for covering the noise rather than the light, the political infighting as opposed to the substance of major issues. I think we need to cover both."

Finally, Sherrie Mazingo of the Star Tribune in Minneapolis wrote that readers were getting overwhelmed by some of the coverage. "The claims and counter-claims ... have become a significant distraction," she said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kerry; leonarddownie; liberalmedia; media; msm; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; swift; swiftboatveterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: commish

Translation: "How in the hell do we come off as responsible and enterprising, when facts come out that we did not report months ago when Kerry was running in the primaries and should have come under responsible press scrutiny? To report shows we did not do our job because of political slant; to not report means we are missing the big party and a chance to sell more print."


41 posted on 08/24/2004 7:05:47 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Hitlery Recently Seen Throwing Banana Peels in Front of Kerry and Edwards' Residences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar

The Marxist mainstream press will do what it always does - lie, cover up and launch ad hominum attacks.

And when it's done it will claim that the stories were fair and balanced.

Then the press will pad its circulation numbers while millions of people cancel their subscriptions.


42 posted on 08/24/2004 7:06:20 AM PDT by sergeantdave (I wasn't there before I was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar
"Alison Mitchell, deputy national editor for The New York Times (Click for QuikCap), points to the changing media landscape and its impact on what newspapers choose to cover. "I'm not sure that in an era of no-cable television we would even have looked into it," she said.

This says it all, but it was not cable news that kept this story alive but the Internet. Indeed, venues like Free Republic and others made silence on this issue impossible. Quite quickly, then, Talk Radio followed by Cable News picked up the cry and now we are at the acme of the event.

IMHO, if someone can get excerpts of "New Soldier" on the Net and on Talk Radio, they will devastate the Kerry Campaign.

43 posted on 08/24/2004 7:09:22 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

ping.... that's a worthy forecast


44 posted on 08/24/2004 7:09:25 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Sent to accuracy@usatoday.com:



Dear Mr. Jones,

In your role as Accuracy Editor, I would like to inform you that USA Today's politics editor was quoted in Editor and Publisher magazine as follows:

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000617053
-----
"Kerry has made his Vietnam service a centerpiece of the Democratic National Convention and the Swift Boat Veterans came out right after that," said Lee Horwich, politics editor at USA Today, which ran a story about the veterans group, and inconsistencies in its accounts, on Aug. 16.
-----

The fact is, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth was founded on May 4, 2004, nearly three months before the Democratic National Convention. They issued a press release - found on their website at http://swift1.he.net/~swiftvet/index.php?topic=Releases&page=2 (which was apparently missed by Mr. Horwich in his role as Politics Editor at USA Today), and held a press conference which was not attended by any representative of USA Today. They also issued an open letter to John Kerry on that day which was also evidently missed or ignored.

And on May 17, they issued another press release, also missed or ignored, calling on Kerry to cease the fraudulent use of the group photo when all but two of the individuals pictured there oppose his candidacy.

In short, the only reason Mr. Horwich thinks that SBVT came out right after the July 26-29 DNC is because he was either willfully or negligently failed to acknowledge the group for three months.

In short, Mr. Jones, this failing on the part of Mr. Horwich may have resulted in inaccurate statements about the group being published in USA Today. I encourage you to check out this possibility in the interests of accuracy and fairness.

-Michael Pelletier.


45 posted on 08/24/2004 7:09:50 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan
Oh the gaul of these primadonnas in the MSM.

Now, now, there's no need to drag France into this....

46 posted on 08/24/2004 7:10:48 AM PDT by xjcsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Belisaurius
And these 'tards think it's all a distraction?
Roger, WTF, out, I guess.

* bump *

47 posted on 08/24/2004 7:11:56 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar

I don't know why this is even a story. All the mainstream media has to do is to continue what they have been doing.... printing the dem talking points straight off their fax machines as news stories.

The problem has been over the last two weeks that the dems were caught flat footed and it took them a couple weeks to figure out what their talking points were going to be, which left the alphabet networks and newspapers floundering, not knowing how to handle it.


48 posted on 08/24/2004 7:11:59 AM PDT by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
would not be surprised if they were paid to say pro-Kerry stuff

I would be surprised if they were being paid.

Someone may have suggested ways in which it would be good for them to rejoin the crew.

An individual could be an "unpaid volunteer," hoping for some other type of gain which is important to him.

49 posted on 08/24/2004 7:14:09 AM PDT by syriacus (Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero --- --- before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Not just excerpts of "The New Soldier", here's the entire book :-)

===

68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub has been posting this on various threads...

The New Soldier by John Kerry and Vietnam Veterans Against the War

http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier%20Inro.pdf
http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier.pdf
http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier%20Epilogue.pdf

FREE Download of The New Soldier by John Kerry
and and Vietnam Veterans Against the War

Print and distibute the book that John Kerry "forgets" to mention!


50 posted on 08/24/2004 7:28:29 AM PDT by Tamzee (Kerry is The Meringue Candidate.... saccharine sweet stories with no actual substance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Aunt Polgara

The MSM's were part of the talking points, Washpost prints an article rebutting a Swifty, then the Dems put out a press release saying the vets have been "thoroughly discredited" or "partisan" or "questionable timing". Then the MSM prints the Dem press release. That's how it is supposed to work. Anybody seen Sandy Berger lately?


51 posted on 08/24/2004 7:33:50 AM PDT by palmer (Solutions, not just slogans -JFKerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar

Try the truth A holes. I know that's an anathema to the media, but it will set them free.....from the evil DUMS


52 posted on 08/24/2004 7:40:49 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Good summary!

So, how do be certain M. Malkin reads this thread?


53 posted on 08/24/2004 7:45:51 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
The banner treatment, running across three-fourths of the front page above the fold, places the onus of proof where it belongs -- on the accusers, not on Kerry,....

The onus of proof is on the accusers.......UNLESS the accused is a Republican.
Now I get it.
/sarcasm

54 posted on 08/24/2004 7:46:21 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Astounding. In May the Swiftvets first had a press conference to make their charges. Those charges were unprecedented in American political history--a vast majority of men who had served with or near a major party's likely presidential candidate saying he was unfit to command on the basis of their own direct personal experience with him.

Nothing like this has ever happened with any of the other major party presidential candidates who ran at least partially on the basis of their service. The four who come closest are Dole, Kennedy, Truman, and George H. W. Bush, all of whom served honorably as junior offices and all of whom used their military experience as an element of their campaigns. NONE of them was subjected to this type of well documented, determined attack on his military service.

Since Kerry, unlike any of those others, made his service the centerpiece of his campaign, instead of a subordinate part, a reasonably fair media would have jumped to investigate the charges against him and to demand his complete records, as they did with President Bush. Instead, they did their level best to suppress this story, the most important political story of the campaign.

Now, the most important story of the campaign, and one that won't go away for many years, is how the MSM committed journalistic malpractice by shamelessly trying to suppress the most relevant, riveting political story of the entire campaign.
55 posted on 08/24/2004 7:48:14 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

My prediction is that one or more of the band-aid brothers will come clean and admit they were paid off by the Kerry camp.


56 posted on 08/24/2004 7:51:09 AM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Shhhh!

Don't tell anybody.

He's hiding in my left sock.

57 posted on 08/24/2004 7:55:31 AM PDT by George Smiley (Tagline removed pursuant to threatening letters from DNC and Kerry/Edwards attorneys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar

You mean there really is a left wing media conspiracy and they have their own magazine?


58 posted on 08/24/2004 8:03:31 AM PDT by LowNslow (Retired CWO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tractorman
This is a good reason to read the book, if you haven't so far. One of the most important points in the book's first half is that Kerry did not want to be in combat and loudly complained that combat was what he hadn't volunteered for. As a result, he did his level best to keep his boat out of most of the really hot spots. The best example is the Rassmann incident where he fled while all the other boats were going to the aid of the disabled boat and only returned when it was clear there was no enemy firing. Thus, each of the "Band of Brothers" who served on his boat probably felt grateful for being kept out of the line of fire and having the other guys placed far more in harm's way than would have been the case if Kerry and his crew had been doing what they should.
59 posted on 08/24/2004 8:09:43 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: viewfromafar

The headline should read - "Editors grapple with how to SPIN Swift Boat controversy"


60 posted on 08/24/2004 8:30:13 AM PDT by Owl558 (Pardon my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson