Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush and I Were Lieutenants ^ | 8/25/04 | Col. William Campenni

Posted on 08/25/2004 1:01:38 AM PDT by kattracks

George Bush and I were lieutenants and pilots in the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron (FIS), Texas Air National Guard (ANG) from 1970 to 1971. We had the same flight and squadron commanders (Maj. William Harris and Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, both now deceased). While we were not part of the same social circle outside the base, we were in the same fraternity of fighter pilots, and proudly wore the same squadron patch.

It is quite frustrating to hear the daily cacophony from the left and Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, et al., about Lt. Bush escaping his military responsibilities by hiding in the Texas ANG. In the Air Guard during the Vietnam War, you were always subject to call-up, as many Air National Guardsmen are finding out today. If the 111th FIS and Lt. Bush did not go to Vietnam, blame President Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, not lowly Lt. Bush. They deliberately avoided use of the Guard and Reserves for domestic political calculations, knowing that a draftee only stirred up the concerns of one family, while a call-up got a whole community's attention.

The mission of the 147th Fighter Group and its subordinate 111th FIS, Texas ANG, and the airplane it possessed, the F-102, was air defense. It was focused on defending the continental United States from Soviet nuclear bombers. The F-102 could not drop bombs and would have been useless in Vietnam. A pilot program using ANG volunteer pilots in F-102s (called Palace Alert) was scrapped quickly after the airplane proved to be unsuitable to the war effort. Ironically, Lt. Bush did inquire about this program but was advised by an ANG supervisor (Maj. Maurice Udell, retired) that he did not have the desired experience (500 hours) at the time and that the program was winding down and not accepting more volunteers.

If you check the 111th FIS records of 1970-72 and any other ANG squadron, you will find other pilots excused for career obligations and conflicts. The Bush excusal in 1972 was further facilitated by a change in the unit's mission, from an operational fighter squadron to a training squadron with a new airplane, the F-101, which required that more pilots be available for full-time instructor duty rather than part-time traditional reservists with outside employment.

The winding down of the Vietnam War in 1971 provided a flood of exiting active-duty pilots for these instructor jobs, making part-timers like Lt. Bush and me somewhat superfluous. There was a huge glut of pilots in the Air Force in 1972, and with no cockpits available to put them in, many were shoved into nonflying desk jobs. Any pilot could have left the Air Force or the Air Guard with ease after 1972 before his commitment was up because there just wasn't room for all of them anymore.

Sadly, few of today's partisan pundits know anything about the environment of service in the Reserves in the 1970s. The image of a reservist at that time is of one who joined, went off for six months' basic training, then came back and drilled weekly or monthly at home, with two weeks of "summer camp." With the knowledge that Mr. Johnson and Mr. McNamara were not going to call out the Reserves, it did become a place of refuge for many wanting to avoid Vietnam.

There was one big exception to this abusive use of the Guard to avoid the draft, and that was for those who wanted to fly, as pilots or crew members. Because of the training required, signing up for this duty meant up to 2½ years of active duty for training alone, plus a high probability of mobilization. A fighter-pilot candidate selected by the Guard (such as Lt. Bush and me) would be spending the next two years on active duty going through basic training (six weeks), flight training (one year), survival training (two weeks) and combat crew training for his aircraft (six to nine months), followed by local checkout (up to three more months) before he was even deemed combat-ready. Because the draft was just two years, you sure weren't getting out of duty being an Air Guard pilot. If the unit to which you were going back was an F-100, you were mobilized for Vietnam. Avoiding service? Yeah, tell that to those guys.

The Bush critics do not comprehend the dangers of fighter aviation at any time or place, in Vietnam or at home, when they say other such pilots were risking their lives or even dying while Lt. Bush was in Texas. Our Texas ANG unit lost several planes right there in Houston during Lt. Bush's tenure, with fatalities. Just strapping on one of those obsolescing F-102s was risking one's life.

Critics such as Mr. Kerry (who served in Vietnam, you know), Terry McAuliffe and Michael Moore (neither of whom served anywhere) say Lt. Bush abandoned his assignment as a jet fighter pilot without explanation or authorization and was AWOL from the Alabama Air Guard.

Well, as for abandoning his assignment, this is untrue. Lt. Bush was excused for a period to take employment in Florida for a congressman and later in Alabama for a Senate campaign.

Excusals for employment were common then and are now in the Air Guard, as pilots frequently are in career transitions, and most commanders (as I later was) are flexible in letting their charges take care of career affairs until they return or transfer to another unit near their new employment. Sometimes they will transfer temporarily to another unit to keep them on the active list until they can return home. The receiving unit often has little use for a transitory member, especially in a high-skills category like a pilot, because those slots usually are filled and, if not filled, would require extensive conversion training of up to six months, an unlikely option for a temporary hire.

As a commander, I would put such "visitors" in some minor administrative post until they went back home. There even were a few instances when I was unaware that they were on my roster because the paperwork often lagged. Today, I can't even recall their names. If a Lt. Bush came into my unit to "pull drills" for a couple of months, I wouldn't be too involved with him because I would have a lot more important things on my table keeping the unit combat ready.

Another frequent charge is that, as a member of the Texas ANG, Lt. Bush twice ignored or disobeyed lawful orders, first by refusing to report for a required physical in the year when drug testing first became part of the exam, and second by failing to report for duty at the disciplinary unit in Colorado to which he had been ordered. Well, here are the facts:

First, there is no instance of Lt. Bush disobeying lawful orders in reporting for a physical, as none would be given. Pilots are scheduled for their annual flight physicals in their birth month during that month's weekend drill assembly — the only time the clinic is open. In the Reserves, it is not uncommon to miss this deadline by a month or so for a variety of reasons: The clinic is closed that month for special training; the individual is out of town on civilian business; etc.

If so, the pilot is grounded temporarily until he completes the physical. Also, the formal drug testing program was not instituted by the Air Force until the 1980s and is done randomly by lot, not as a special part of a flight physical, when one easily could abstain from drug use because of its date certain. Blood work is done, but to ensure a healthy pilot, not confront a drug user.

Second, there was no such thing as a "disciplinary unit in Colorado" to which Lt. Bush had been ordered. The Air Reserve Personnel Center in Denver is a repository of the paperwork for those no longer assigned to a specific unit, such as retirees and transferees. Mine is there now, so I guess I'm "being disciplined." These "disciplinary units" just don't exist. Any discipline, if required, is handled within the local squadron, group or wing, administratively or judicially. Had there been such an infraction or court-martial action, there would be a record and a reflection in Lt. Bush's performance review and personnel folder. None exists, as was confirmed in The Washington Post in 2000.

Finally, the Kerrys, Moores and McAuliffes are casting a terrible slander on those who served in the Guard, then and now. My Guard career parallels Lt. Bush's, except that I stayed on for 33 years. As a guardsman, I even got to serve in two campaigns. In the Cold War, the air defense of the United States was borne primarily by the Air National Guard, by such people as Lt. Bush and me and a lot of others. Six of those with whom I served in those years never made their 30th birthdays because they died in crashes flying air-defense missions.

While most of America was sleeping and Mr. Kerry was playing antiwar games with Hanoi Jane Fonda, we were answering 3 a.m. scrambles for who knows what inbound threat over the Canadian subarctic, the cold North Atlantic and the shark-filled Gulf of Mexico. We were the pathfinders in showing that the Guard and Reserves could become reliable members of the first team in the total force, so proudly evidenced today in Afghanistan and Iraq.

It didn't happen by accident. It happened because back at the nadir of Guard fortunes in the early '70s, a lot of volunteer guardsman showed they were ready and able to accept the responsibilities of soldier and citizen — then and now. Lt. Bush was a kid whose congressman father encouraged him to serve in the Air National Guard. We served proudly in the Guard. Would that Mr. Kerry encourage his children and the children of his colleague senators and congressmen to serve now in the Guard.

In the fighter-pilot world, we have a phrase we use when things are starting to get out of hand and it's time to stop and reset before disaster strikes. We say, "Knock it off." So, Mr. Kerry and your friends who want to slander the Guard: Knock it off.

COL. WILLIAM CAMPENNI (retired) U.S. Air Force/Air National Guard Herndon, Va.5

TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; campenni; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: kattracks

I wonder if there would be some way to compare the total number of pilots that flew F102's against the total number of people who served in Vietnam. After you did that look at the total number of fatalities. It is my bet that you would find the number by percentage of dead F102 pilots quite high.

I don't remember what Dean Martin's son was flying, but he died in service in the Air Guard. It takes a lot to fly combat aircraft.

41 posted on 08/30/2004 3:10:09 PM PDT by U S Army EOD (John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Just one more reason that vets (and Guard and Reserves in particular) will be lining up in droves at the polling booths voting for GW (or voting against Kerry in protest).

42 posted on 08/30/2004 3:52:55 PM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Bush in a landslide, I bet.

43 posted on 08/30/2004 4:15:15 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Martins kid
Bush did not choose a chushy safe corner to hide in. He was not out there flying little Cessnas.

Indeed, he could have a nice safe ground job in the Air Guard. Intell officer, maintaince officer, communications, motor pool, etc, etc. About the same time Lt. Bush was serving in the Texas Air Guard, another son of Texas Congressman was also serving in the Texas Air Gaurd. That man is now, unfortunately, my Congressman, having "inherited" the seat directly for his father. Sort of a South Texas version of the Daleys I guess. Has anyone asked Congressman Charles Gonzales about his time in the Air Guard? I'm pretty sure he wasn't flying F-102s, which were at Kelly as well as at Elington in those days. Interestingly, while I'm quite certain his official biography mentioned that service at one time, it's now nowhere to be found therein. Hmmm? . IIRC, he was in the Guard, as an officer, while he was going to law school. Maybe his ex wife might know something about that?

44 posted on 08/30/2004 4:55:29 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD

I have heard that when their college deferments ended (And, yes, I am old enough to remember how that worked), Kerry applied for a deferment to study in Paris. When that was denied, he applied to the Navy Reserve (which was unlikely to be called).
W decided to be a fighter pilot, and applied to the best place to get that slot - the Texas Nat'l Guard. He was more likely to be called up than Kerry was.

It turned out that neither of them got what they thought they would.

I think W is better at dealing with the hand he is given. Kerry has a problem with unexpected situations.

45 posted on 08/30/2004 5:08:43 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

Well Kerry is quite flexable in any given situation.

46 posted on 08/30/2004 6:43:46 PM PDT by U S Army EOD (John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Representative Charles A. 'Charlie' Gonzalez was a Technical Sergeant in Texas Air National Guard from 1969 until 1975.
47 posted on 08/30/2004 7:19:56 PM PDT by TankerKC (R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Thanks for the ping!

48 posted on 08/30/2004 9:34:35 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Representative Charles A. 'Charlie' Gonzalez was a Technical Sergeant in Texas Air National Guard from 1969 until 1975.

Thanks, I did try to find some evidence of his Guard service, since he'd removed it from his official biography.

So how about that, almost the same years as Bush, except he wasn't putting his skinny butt on the line flying a high performance fighter. I still wonder what his AFSC was? IIRC it was actually harder to get into the Air Guard as an enlistee than as a pilot. It was also less of a sacrifice, since most enlisted AFSC's only required the greater of 6 months or however long the combination of basic training and tech school took of initial active duty. Then it required the standard 1 weekend a month and two weeks of service. Pilots put in way more drills, and short periods of active duty as well, than non-flying personnel.

49 posted on 08/30/2004 9:59:36 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson